Celebrities in Politics Celebrities undoubtably play a large role in American society. They are the faces of commercials, have large followings, and have become household names. Especially with the rise of social media such as Twitter, celebrities have become closer to the everyday person. Celebrities can tweet out their opinion on politics or show support for social movements, and have this be seen by millions of people in seconds. With the recent Colin Kaepernick controversy, more of the general public are starting to hound famous people with messages criticizing their participation in politics. Should celebrities keep out of politics? Well, stars have already been participating in politics for decades, and have even held political positions. …show more content…
Former president Ronald Reagan was a Hollywood actor before he was president from 1981 to 1989. Reagan had a fairly high presidential approval rating by the end of his presidency, at 63 percent (Newport, Jones, & Saad, 2004). His presidency was fairly successful, showing that despite being an actor and living a more privileged life then the general public, he was still capable of making decent decisions in politics. Also, some celebrities actually gained fame due to their ties in politics. While celebrity influence is more critically attacked now, stars such as Green Day have been making obvious political statements since the early 2000s. Green Day’s song, American Idiot, was released in 2004 and openly criticized the American government and society under George W. Bush. Their inflammatory lyrics, “now everyone do the propaganda, and sing along to the age of paranoia” mockingly refers to the post 9/11 xenophobic mindset of American society and the manipulation of society via media and government (Armstrong, 2004). This song was widely acclaimed, and was so successful that its album, American Idiot, was adapted to a musical (Nassiff, 2014). This greatly bolstered Green Day’s fame. Celebrities and politics are intertwined, and therefore famous stars should not be criticized for participating in political …show more content…
Studies have shown that a celebrities do in fact effect how people perceive politics. Anthony J. Nownes’s experiment on how political activity effects someone’s perception shows that “celebrities’ political activities can influence how people think about the political parties” (Nownes, 2014). Their massive followings allow stars to sway public opinion by just speaking out. This could be used to inform the public and attract attention to political or social issues. A clear example of this is found in Oprah Winfrey, actress and talk show host. She has a massive influence on the American public, as seen when she announced that should would be buying stock in Weight Watchers. Nathan Bomey stated that the stock price of Weight Watchers increased by 105 percent in a matter of days (2015). Oprah’s influence had also extended to politics, when she endorsed Barack Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary. Garthwaite and Moore estimated that “Oprah’s endorsement was worth about 1 million votes for Obama”. These extra votes could have won the vote for Obama, given that he had only had 278,966 more votes than his competitor, Hilary Clinton (2012). Celebrities can draw a larger voter turnout, which allows for more representation of people in voting. This shows that famous stars have some sway in American public opinion, and that they could use it to work for the development
In the court case Citizen United vs. United States of America the Supreme Court ruled that PACs and corporations could spend as much they wanted to as long as it was done independently of the party (doc. A). This ruling has allowed interest groups and PACs to spend as much money as they want on political campaigning commercials. Interest groups and PACs influence media heavily because of their ability to spend however much they choose too. Media is not the only way that people are persuaded to vote, political parties also use their stances on important issue to help gain
In this article Diana Mutz wrote about the election campaign and how it affects the people. In her career when she has covered the campaign as a part of media it was not really a great feeling for her. She believes there is a great difference between how public views the part media plays in election then what a candidate thinks. She thinks media is not very influential to change public views over a candidate. She argued that majority of the people already knew and determined on who they going to vote way before the general election campaign started.
AA35 Dr. Reese English 102 30 October 2017 Ronald Reagan Era From Hollywood to the White House, President Ronald Reagan has always been a public favorite, especially among presidential history. Many people view him as an iconic political figure, who made intelligent decisions as part of his leadership. President Reagan has been credited with numerous feats and failures, such as, reducing the poverty rate by cutting taxes and increasing defense spending, negotiating a nuclear arms reduction agreement with the Soviets to bring a quicker end to the Cold War, and by delivering weapons to terrorists.
Ronald Reagan had an advantage when dealing with the media thanks to acting. Most Americans during the time of the Reagan presidency received news via television. Edel (1992) noted Reagan was “especially effective” on television, and he rarely let “inquiring reporters or other distractions” phase him. He knew “every trick in the cameraman’s book” and was able to use it to his advantage in his presidency (p.263). Reagan was always camera ready making him look personable, cheerful, and in control on the television.
Ronald Reagan was a mediocre film actor. He will never have made what in the entertainment world the A list which is a high level of acting like Clark Gable or Cary Grant, Humphrey Bogart. Regan was relegated through the 30,40, 50, to roles in B-movies including Bedtime for Bozo (1951). When Reagan became a well know politician and his undistinguished career in Hollywood most politician saw him as no treated but they were dead wrong.
Even well known people that used to work in politics
Vargas 5 Ronald Reagan: America’s Leading Man Ronald Reagan, only movie actor to become president, was recognized for his conservative republicanism, fervent anticommunism, policies contributing to demise of the Soviet Union, appealing personal style, skilled as an orator which earned him the title “Great Communicator.” (Britannica) However, Reagan didn’t get this recognition easily, he worked really hard to get to there. Reagan got his start in politics in a televised 1964 address.
Many of these celebrities have created a toxic environment that builds peer pressure in society. As seen with advertisements and body shaming that celebrities do whether it 's meant or not people are being influenced by this. Individuals have a growing amount of peer pressure to follow celebrities such as Kim Kardashian and follow their trends due to the poisoning of pure pressure. People may not fit in if they don’t follow to the status quo which has the potential to lead to a ruined society. Individuals are wasting time on entertainment while they can be doing more productive things.
Even when celebrities follow the practice of a particular pattern of constantly re-inventing themselves through controversy it promotes public interest and sparks curiosity it often makes front-page news in the media. This is, in a sense, publicity for the celebrity. As it promotes their name and their brand which helps them become more and more recognized. Sociologist Goffman would
My last paragraph are people’s opinions and professionals quotes about it. Celebrities get paid way too much money. They should at least use their money for a good cause. They should give some of their money to people who are risking their lives and fighting for our country for us. Some use their money for completely wrong things.
Would you want you whole life stalked by people and paparazzi snapping pictures of you eating, sleeping, having personal time with friends or family, and somehow always finding out where you are and getting no private time to yourself? Most people prefer to don’t want to be stalked everyday, especially when your sleeping or eating with someone. Gossip tends to ruin or somewhat help people’s lives because it spreads certain things you didn’t want some people to know that have now found out due to gossip, which inevitably is worse then not being able to stand up to the person face to face and tell them yourself. This life of a celebrity can be extremely harmful, not only to the individual themselves, but the people around that individual. Another thing that tends to be ruined or lost by celebrity culture is
However, these celebrities often are extremely vocal with their opinion and they abuse that power, in occasions in a positive way. Due to the enormous following celebrities have on social media, when they share their opinion online a majority of the public tend to comply with that opinion. Notably, back in 2007 Oprah’s endorsement of Barack Obama’s presidency played a tremendous role in the 2008 election results with over one million votes in favor of Barack Obama; certainly, celebrities can influence the public opinion. Moreover, celebrities and social media go hand in hand by cause of them posting their opinions on the different social media platforms that exist. Celebrities are not aware of the power they, and social media have on the public opinion; in other words, celebrities on social media are one of the main influencers on what view of a certain topic the public oblige
The hidden reality of celebrities makes people go crazy and it is a way for them to become more people and earn more money. They are using harmful ways to gain fame and money. Celebrities aren’t the right people to be role models because –they misuse their social media, spend their money the wrong way,
Thus associating a public figure with a brand, employs rhetorical teachings to implicate the ethos appeal thereby associating a sense of credibility and trustworthiness with the brand. Thus celebrities can be used for the following: • New users: Celebrities in advertising helps in first time users of the products.
Celebrities with positive influence are not given the opportunity to spread their positive message to the world because the spotlight is mostly given to those who have no dreams and goals in life.