After laws were passed that separated African Americans and Whites, the lives of those who were harmfully affected saw no progress in their mission for equality. After the Thirteenth Amendment abolished in America, racial discrimination became regulated by the Jim Crow laws, which mandated strict segregation of the races. Several lies were affected because of segregation it was a major problem for people in the United States of America whether it was the South or the North. Two leaders had different perspectives to handle racism but they both wanted to end racism and they were W.E.B. Dubois & Booker T. Washington. Booker T. Washington was born in the South April 5, 1856 and was educator, author, orator, and advisor to presidents of the United States. He was also the most influential black leader of his time between 1856 and 1915. Booker T. …show more content…
Dubois was born in February 23, 1868 and was an American sociologist, historian, civil rights activist, Pan-Africanist, author, writer and editor. Racism was the main target of Du Bois's pleas, and he strongly protested against murdering, Jim Crow laws, and discrimination in education and employment. Du Bois advocated political action, civil and he helped found the NAACP. In addition, he argued that social change could be accomplished by developing the small group of college-educated blacks. Du Bois demanded civil rights now took aggressive actions in order for the African Americans to be equal. Du Bois and his supporters opposed the Atlanta compromise, an agreement made by Booker T. Washington which provided that Southern blacks would work and submit to white political rule, while Southern whites guaranteed that blacks would receive basic educational and economic opportunities. Instead, Du Bois vowed full civil rights and increased political representation, which he believed would be brought about by the mastery of African-American intellectual elite. He also believed that capitalism was the primary cause of
Booker T. Washington & W.E.B. Dubois were both famous activist. They did take different directions in how they approached how to gain their freedom. W.E.B. wanted to fight to gain everyone's freedom while Booker T. chose to with the government and overlook the separate but racial stuff. There early life was different. So was their role in the civil rights movement.
Washington and W.E.B Du Bois and Booker T Washington clearly had a great amount of differences when it came to equality for African Americans. Du bois proposed a strategy of ceaseless agitation and insistent demand for equality;
Regardless, they were able to aid in ending discrimination and received equal standing in education, labor, acquiring of land, etc.. If it had only been Du Bois fighting for equality, then he would have achieved the fight for equality sooner. On the contrary, Du Bois only provided one view to how African Americans were being treated; Washington had a friendlier approach. This may be due to his fear of being lynched or placing African Americans in a harsher situation than they already were. Washington seemed more methodical—he was thinking about African Americans having the full rights of the 14th and 15th amendments. At the same, he was also concerned about the consequences of his speech, and if it angered the whites more than it relieved the situation they were all facing.
Thomas Moss had a tremendous impact on blacks. Moss had achieved economic success by opening up people’s grocery, and that made him a threat to whites. Colored people were tried of seeing others getting beaten, murdered, and lynched. “Tell my people to go west there is no justice for them here” He said in many rivers to cross episode 4.
Washington, Du Bois, and Reform During the Gilded Age of the United States, the nation was adapting to the many changes of industrialization, immigration, and reform. The age saw attempts to reconstruct from the Civil War and allow African Americans to adapt and join society. Unfortunately, many southern states were able to create loopholes and regulations such as Jim Crow Laws and literacy tests to marginalize the influence of African American citizens. As a result, African American leaders such as Booker T. Washington and Web Du Bois rose up and tried to fight the oppressive feelings and laws of the age.
Du Bois, while fighting for civil rights, believed that Washington's ways would continue to cause black oppression. Du Bois believed the only way to have equality was through higher education at a college level. He was not willing to give up anything; instead, he wanted to fight for his rights of his people. Both men wanted their nation to have better treatment from the white society. During their quest for equal rights, Washington focused more on economical rights while Du Bois focused on political rights.
and W.E.B Du Bois wanted to achieve the same goal but just in drastically different ways. Booker T.’s strategies were very peaceful towards the community and everyone in it. Then he wanted everything to be peaceful because he wanted African Americans to gain self-economic improvement so they could move forward. He believed that discrimination and racism were very acceptable temporarily. He also encouraged blacks to “dignify and glorify common labor” as well as having separate rights from whites.
His approach was confrontational and called for ceaseless aggravation, protests and legal actions to end the Jim Crow laws. He wanted African Americans to demand full political, civil and social rights. DuBois agreed with Washington that self-improvement was a good idea, but in no way, did DuBois believe that it was more important than African Americans achieving immediate full citizenship rights. DuBois attacked Washington’s acceptance of racial segregation in his Atlanta Compromise and argued that Washington was too accommodating to the interest of white America. He also spoke against Garvey’s approach, claiming that “Marcus Garvey is, without doubt, the most dangerous enemy of the negro race in America and in the world.
He disagreed with what Booker T. Washington was going for. He argued that all blacks should have the opportunity for some education that fits their talents. He
On the other hand, the argument of W.E.B Du Bois was quite the opposite. In the text, “The Souls of Black Folk” published in 1903, Du Bois disagreed with Washington on the claim that the African American people should not strive for absolute greatness, and he was a strong advocate for the African American people to aim as high as possible. W.E.B Du Bois had the strongest argument. This is because Washington was asking the African American people to trade their civil rights, such as voting in elections and participating in governments, for economic chances at advancement. Further, Du Bois makes the counterargument that when you look back at history, you will find that people who followed action plans such as Washingtons, were ‘not worth civilizing’.
Dr. W.E.B Du Bois uses this essay to sway the audience of the insufficiency of the statements that Mr. Booker T. Washington has made about African Americans being submissive of rights and the creation of wealth. Mr. Washington believes that the black race should give up and give into what the society norms were at that time sequentially just to have a certain right. Dr. Du Bois refused to believe that the black race should give up one right to get another right. Especially, when the white South had all rights without expecting to give up anything to have those rights.
Achieving African American Equality Booker T. Washington and W.E.B Du Bois were two of the most influential advocates for African American equality during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (Blatty, 1). Although both men ultimately had the same goal, their methods for achieving African American equality were remarkably different. To begin, the men had conflicting ideas about what constituted as African American equality. Booker T. Washington argued that the accumulation of wealth and the ability to prove that Blacks were productive members of society would be the mark of true equality for African Americans (Painter, 155).
However Booker T. Washington believed in having a more skillful education, consisting of learning how to trade, mastering agriculture skills and more things one would need to get a job. However, W.E.B DuBois also put many efforts to achieve equal rights towards African Americans which Booker T Washington put on hold. Booker T Washington’s plan was to make it so that “Blacks would [have to] accept segregation and discrimination but their eventual acquisition of wealth and culture would gradually win for them the respect and acceptance of whites”. This vision that Booker T Washington had “practically accepts the alleged inferiority of the Negro race”. W.E.B commented on this process saying it was an attempt, “to educate black boys and girls simply as servants and underlings.”
In the mid-to-late 1800s the African American community faced opposition and segregation. They were segregated from the whites and treated as second-class citizens. This segregation was caused in part by Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws separated races in schools, hospitals, parks, public buildings, and transportation systems. Both Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois had ideas on how to improve African American lives, Washington believed in starting at the bottom and working up whereas Du Bois had an opposing viewpoint he saw starting from the bottom as submissive and believed African Americans should hold important jobs in order to demand equal treatment.
W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington were two great leaders of the black community in the late 19th and 20th century. They both had the same intent with their thought but they came from two different backgrounds so it was hard for them to have agreement. Booker T. Washington spent his early childhood in slavery. W. E. B. DuBois grew up both free and in the North. Ergo, he did not experience the harsh conditions of slavery or of southern prejudice he grew up with white Americans and even attended predominately white schools.