Analysis of Rhetoric in William Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar” The Oxford Dictionary defines rhetoric as “the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, especially the use of figures of speech and other compositional techniques.” Rhetorical techniques are littered throughout William Shakespeare’s 1600 play “Julius Caesar,” which dramatizes Caesar’s life in a manner suitable for a general audience. Most notably, rhetorical devices are powerfully used by characters Brutus and Mark Antony to express conflicting perspectives regarding Caesar’s murder at his funeral. Brutus’ speech in justification of Caesar’s murder utilizes logos and pathos to appeal to the public’s logical and emotional senses. To use logos is to appeal to one’s reason …show more content…
Brutus uses logos to appeal to the audience’s reason by explaining that Caesar’s murder was necessary, lest his ambition would grow and reduce the common folk to slaves. He conveys that sacrifice was necessary to preserve freedom in Rome, thus it was reasonable to sacrifice Caesar for the greater good. Brutus continues to exercise logos in the statement “There is tears for his (Caesar’s) love; joy for his fortune; honour for his valour; and death for his ambition” (JC 3.2). Brutus assigns consequences to Caesar’s various beneficial and detrimental attributes. Thus, Brutus suggests that because there are positive results of Caesar’s admirable qualities, it is reasonable that there is a negative consequence of his …show more content…
Antony uses anaphora, the repetition of words or phrases, to emphasize the contrast between Brutus’ attacks on Caesar’s character and Caesar’s charitable acts. For instance, Antony claims, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (JC 3.2.75-105). Antony continually makes similar comparisons to challenge Brutus’ portrayal of Caesar’s likeness as ambitious and self-serving. Such comparisons are followed with references to Brutus’ honor, demonstrated in the statement, “I thrice presented him (Caesar) a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition? Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, And, sure, he is an honorable man” (JC 3.2.75-105). By first refuting Brutus’ claim and consequently noting his honor, Antony challenges Brutus’ honesty and portrays him as untrustworthy to the audience. Antony builds support for his claims and ensures understanding amongst the audience through the continuous repetition of this effective format, whilst establishing a further connection with the people using pathos. Namely, Antony weeps, “You all did love him once, not without cause. What cause withholds you then to mourn for him? O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts, And men have lost their reason. Bear with me. My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,
In Brutus’s speech that he gave for the reason for Julius Caesar’s death, he gives examples of logos to persuade the crowd. Brutus says that the reason for Caesar’s death was because of his ambition to become the emperor. But in Antony’s speech, he claims to have presented the crown to him 3 times, and Caesar refused all 3 times. Brutus claims his reason for aiding in the murder of Caesar was, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” but Anthony also stated “For Brutus as you know was Caesar’s angel.”
Persuading an audience is difficult, but rhetorical devices can change arguments to appeal to the assortment of people listening. After killing Julius Caesar, Brutus presents a speech to the plebeians of Rome explaining why the assassination was necessary. As Brutus attempts to gain support from his fellow countrymen he utilizes ethos by proclaiming, ”believe me / for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour” (III.ii.1547-1548). The citizens hold Brutus in high regard and so he makes them all remember the positive way they think of him and uses that feeling so they all believe him. Antony has more tack as he foresees the fickle nature of the plebeians and uses pathos more often.
Obviously, this does nothing but discredit Brutus, as his intention was for Marc Antony to explain that they had a good reason for killing Caesar - in effect, that he was going to become an evil man or a tyrant. Although he is saying that the good that Caesar did will be buried with his body, and that the Plebeians will only remember the evil, he is implying that Caesar did do good - and that Brutus is only showing them the bad of Caesar, and not the
So it is all on the line for Antony and Brutus. Brutus did a great job of using logos and lots of ethos in his speech, but most of his reasons to justify Caesar’s slaying were predictions of Caesar’s future behavior. Antony uses a lot of statements that are primarily pathos to persuade the crowd that the great Julius should still be alive. This is most of the reason why Antony’s address is the better of the two. Here are some of the fallacies that Brutus uses.
He did this in one of his many speeches during Caesar’s funeral when Antony showed the public Caesar's body. “Look in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through. … See what a rent envious Casca made. ”(3.1.169-170) Antony used the fact that Caesar’s assassination was brutal and cruel to prove to the public that the killers had not killed Caesar for the good of Rome but out of envy of the love that Caesar was receiving and the power he was being given. This act is most likely the most powerful use of logos in the entire book for it convinced the public to completely turn against the conspirators and side with
Within Antony’s speech to the Romans he uses anaphoric text to spike a whirl of rage towards Brutus. Repeatedly Antony states “Brutus is an honorable man” emphatically for the duration of his speech to contradict Brutus’s nobility ( March Antony, Lines 83,88,95 ). Before Antony begins his speech he is approached by the Romans with comments to not speak bad on Brutus’s name, which is why he utilized the anaphora to repeat that Brutus is an honorable man therefore allowing him to gain the Romans trust to speak. Antony does not say these lines truthfully but sarcastically to make the people of Rome feel furious against Brutus for taking Caesar to his mortal death.
He used consistent contentions to legitimize Caesar's death, emphasizing that Caesar's passing was fundamental to protecting the Roman Republic. For illustration, he says, "It is not that I adore Caesar less, but I adore Rome more" (III.ii.21-22). Brutus, moreover, requested the open to be ethically and morally cognizant, showing himself as a respectable and respectable individual who acted out of obligation. He announced, "Accept in me for my honor, and my honor, that you just may accept" (III.ii.14-15).
Brutus states repeatedly that Caesar’s death was an act of heroism, and it was necessary to save Rome from politically falling. However, the one that proves to be far more significant and powerful was the speech by Mark Antony. He uses logos, hyperboles, and rhetorical questions to
This appeals to the people and makes them all feel like one. This statement is an example of pathos. Pathos is the emotion of the speech. Antony uses pathos a lot in his speech to connect with
In Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,
In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.
After reading excerpts from Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, write an essay that compares Brutus’ speech with Marc Antony’s speech and argues the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos) used in each. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts. William Shakespeare writes a play about Julius Caesar’s assassination and the speeches his friends gave at his funeral. In the play, Brutus assassinated Caesar because he thought he was protecting Rome. He was saying that if Caesar got all the power he would most likely become vicious and make everyone his slaves.
Continuing, it is also shown that while using the will and throughout his speech, Antony highlights the positive aspects of Caesar’s accomplishments, while Brutus puts Caesar in a negative perspective which does not help his justification that he killed Caesar for Rome, and not because he had a personal rivalry against
Sydney Stone Mrs. Paul English 10A 16 October 2017 Rhetorical Analysis Essay William Shakespeare, a very famous writer, tells the story of Julius Caesar. In his play, Marc Antony delivers a powerful speech that uses many different rhetorical devices, appeals, and different styles of writing. Some of these include repetition, rhetorical questions, pathos, logos, ethos, and diction. These help enhance Marc Antony’s speech by persuading the audience towards considering that Caesar was a good man.
When Brutus spoke about his motives to kill Caesar he said, “As he was valiant I / honor him. But, as he was ambitious, I slew him.” (3.2.27-28). Brutus honored Caesar but saw that his ambition has the potential of being very dangerous. He thought that a danger like Caesar could not be left to grow more powerful when there is a solution to the issue now.