In William Shakespeare’s, The Tragedy of Julius Shakespeare, characters Marc Antony and Marcus Brutus deliver funeral speeches to the Roman public. They share their perspectives on the recent death of soon to be crowned king, Julius Caesar. Along with several other conspirators, Brutus brutally murders Caesar, ceasing his rise to power. Brutus delivers a dramatic, yet persuasive speech to explain his intentions for participating in the conspiracy. Antony was a loyal friend of Caesar, fixed on avenging Caesar’s death. He makes a fiery and provoking speech to rally support from Rome and instigate a rebellion against the conspirators. Antony’s speech is more effective in conveying his thoughts through his effective uses of pathos and ethos to …show more content…
He draws sympathy from the audience as he describes the Caesar he knew: Humble and attentive. He declares that, “When the poor cried, Caesar cried too” (Shakespeare 3.1. 89). Later in his speech he says that, “ You all saw that on the Lupercal feast day I offered him a king’s crown three times, and he refused it three times” (Shakespeare 3.1. 93-94). Antony explains that Caesar was not ambitious; in fact he was benevolent to the poor and content with his current place in the government. The story reiterates how humble Caesar was instead of the ambitious leader Brutus depicted. Additionally, Antony appeals to the emotions of the audience, eventually, overwhelmed by his own grief. He says that, “You all loved him once, and not without reason. Then what reason holds you back from mourning him now? Men have become brutish beasts and lost their reason” (Shakespeare 3.1 100-103)! Antony brings up a series of questions to the audience, wondering why the audience’s loyalty quickly shifted from Caesar to Brutus. Antony expresses his concerns with the audience’s fickle loyalty, which is now to the conspirators. He guilts the audience through his questioning and his emotional breakdown to sow the seeds for a rebellion. He creates a sense of obligation to Caesar, especially during a time of political corruption. Antony knew he could provoke his audience - hence he preyed on their ignorance and …show more content…
Brutus emphasizes that, “ …it’s not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. Would you rather that Caesar were living and we would all go to our graves as slaves, or that Caesar were dead and we all lived as free men” (Shakespeare 3.1 20-23)? In his eyes, the death is justifiable to the extent that his intentions were to protect the public from Caesar’s potential, but expected, oppressive rule. Ultimately, the ends may have justified the means, but Brutus failed to communicate this to his uneducated audience. Afterwards, Brutus calls on the crowd to see if anyone disagrees with him, discouraging his audience from speaking out. Brutus may have had valid reasons to support the conspiracy, yet he does not effectively simplify them for his audience. He creates a hostile atmosphere and demonstrates a lack of accountability. This makes it fairly simple for Antony to undermine his claims and indirectly call upon the audience to avenge Caesar. Rather than focusing on one main point like Brutus, Antony takes several approaches to strengthen his argument. Antony begins with establishing the purpose of his speech, meant to be a funeral oration than to praise him. He describes his friendship with Caesar and his public actions that disprove Brutus’ speech. Finally, he shares that Caesar wrote a will, refusing to read it until the crowd seems to completely support him.
He continuously says how much Caesar loved the people of Rome, hoping to entice the crowd. Antony yells, “It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you,” (Shakespeare 3.2.138). This reinstates the idea that Caesar loved all the citizens of Rome. Antony knows that if the crowd knows this, it will continue to fuel their rage against the conspirators. The next use of pathos in the speech is Antony’s large story, that is completely fabricated, just to continue his plan of turning the crowd in his favor.
He tries to ally himself with the people labeling them as friends and fellow Romans. Starting out on a sincere note that will earn him respect from the crowd. Following this, Antony urges the crowd to join him in mourning Caesar, and eventually, he is overcome with distress. After regaining his composure he goes on to tell them that Caesar had been silenced, and he expresses dissatisfaction that the crowd wasn’t mourning with him. He puts the idea of rebellion in the minds of his listeners, but he urges them not to act on it.
At his funeral, Antony gives a speech in which addresses the mob siding with Brutus that is celebrating his death. In his speech, Antony uses a variety of appeals in order to convince the mob that Brutus should be held accountable for the death of Caesar. Antony’s
The motivation behind Antony’s actions was completely selfish as he wanted to defend and avenge Caesar, gain power by giving himself credibility as Caesar’s right hand man, and unleash utter chaos in Rome by invoking civil war. Antony’s speech was able to completely reverse the effects that Brutus’ speech had simply because people care more about what agitates their emotions, rather than what logically makes more sense to
Antony's skillful use of emotional appeal, rhetorical questions, and loaded language creates a powerful argument that sways the people of Rome to join him in avenging Caesar and his supporters for the heinous crimes committed against them by Brutus and his conspirators. Antony's skillful use of language is central to his success, as it allows him to manipulate public opinion and engender fervent support for his cause. This essay will examine how Antony uses these rhetorical devices to great effect, leading to the tragic end of Caesar's life and the further destabilization of Rome's political climate. In Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, Antony's use of emotional appeal plays a key role in swaying the opinions of the Roman citizens against the
He wanted to take care of the people. By saying all this he tries to point out why Brutus was wrong with saying the reason he killed Caesar was because he was ambitious. As Antony speaks, he continues to repeat the line that "Brutus was an honorable man." He does this so that the crowd will catch onto his sarcasm. Brutus only allowed Antony to come speak if he would only say good things about Brutus, so Antony decides to use repetition and sarcasm as well as a way to engage the
Antony wants to remind the Romans that he is credible for speaking of Caesar “that love my friend, and that they know full well, that gave me public leave to speak of him” (III.ii.215-216) Antony uses ethos after telling the Romans everything to convince them in being against that conspirators’ that he can speak of Caesar because he was a close friend of Caesar. Antony convinces the Romans to retribute the conspirators’ for what they have done “In every wound of Caesar that should move the stones of Rome to rise and mutiny” (III.ii.225-226) Antony wants revenge and is convincing the Romans to riot by using pathos. Antony wants the Romans to feel sorry about Caesar’s death “here was a Caesar! When comes such another?”
In Antony’s transformative speech to the crowd, Antony argues for Caesar’s innocence with the application of ethos, logos, and pathos. Doing so forces his audience into sympathizing with Caesar and regarding Caesar’s death with a perspective that the conspirators had not exhibited. First, Antony establishes his honor and trustworthiness with ethos.
By refusing to read the will several times and admitting that what it contains will cause the people to have such a great love for Caesar that knowing he is now dead will be unbearable, Antony ignites curiosity in the people and furthermore, a subconscious feeling of respect and graciousness toward Caesar. Basically, Antony uses Caesar’s will to convince the people that Caesar was a selfless, kind-hearted man and those who killed him should be ashamed and punished for killing an innocent man. Through Antony’s use of paralipsis, he is able to plant a seed of admiration for Caesar and one of hate for the conspirators in the hearts of the plebeians. In his speech to the citizens, Antony also asks many rhetorical questions to cause his audience to pause and reflect on how they really feel, or how Antony wants them to feel, about certain people and events that have recently become important. In one instance.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is quite a rollercoaster of emotions. Caesar and Brutus were two very important people in Rome, they were also best friends. Caesar never expected the betrayal from the people he called friends, especially not from his most fond friend of all, Brutus. Although Brutus did regret the killing of Caesar, at the moment he did not. Brutus thought that Caesar’s death was what would be best for the people of Rome.
Antony wanted people to be patient with him. He also says, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff” (3.2. 100-101). Antony says this to show that Caesar was a good man who cared about the people. It was also to show that Brutus was wrong when he stated that Caesar was ambitious. Antony makes the citizens feel that the conspirators murder was
In this scene Caesar has been murdered by the conspirators including Brutus. Brutus is one of Caesar's good friends who is driven by honor; who thought Caesar’s ambition was going to be the end of Rome. Antony is a very loyal friend of Caesar’s who does not agree with the conspirators. Brutus and Antony are both smart well thought out characters. They desire to persuade the commoners to their side of the situation.
He created a sense of anger towards the people who stabbed Caesar, especially Brutus, as he was the one conspirator that Caesar never thought would betray him. Antony presented this as Brutus and the rest are traitors, and that is the way the commoners viewed it. This, amongst other reasons through their emotions, provoked them into taking revenge against the
Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar
After the assassination of Julius Caesar in, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two men come before the people of Rome with much to say. Those two men are Brutus and Mark Antony. Even though a these men 's speeches have come after the same terribly tragedy they both have very different things to say. Rome was being torn between two sides of a dispute, to forgive the murder of Julius or destroy him. Brutus was a man who honestly believed that by killing Julius Caesar he was doing right by the people of Rome.