Juveniles should not be tried and condemned as adults because they do not have the capacity to perceive what is good and bad. There has been a lot of controversy towards the subject of juveniles in the Court Justice System because many feel that juveniles are to young to be entangled with the law. People need to consider the possibilities of what the Juvenile Justice system can do to help and rehabilitate these delinquents instead of sending them off to an adult court to be tried as an adult, even though they are minors. When Juveniles are tried as adults, people do not know what type of person is being sent to jail and what type of person they are going to release into society later on. In the end Juveniles should not be charged as adults. …show more content…
In the article “Kids Should Never Be Tried As Adults” the author says, “Think of [9 year-old] Cameron Kocher, who couldn’t even stay awake for his pretrial motions. Imagine Jordan Brown, now of all of 12 years old, advising his lawyer on approaches to cross-examining witnesses, or discussing pros and cons of pleading guilty,”(Robert Schwartz). This evidence that a child should not be talking about pros and cons and cross-examination at such a young age because they do not understand such things. These children were still in the age of innocence where they should be playing with toys instead of being at risk of spending over 10 years of jail time for something they did without understanding the consequences. In the same article the author states, “ In the early part of the decade, researchers for the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice found that…[Teenager’s] capacities change significantly over the course of adolescence. The researchers found what many of us were trying to say earlier about Cameron Kocher: that at age of 9, he simply couldn’t process information and plan a crime like an adult.” (Robert Schwartz). This evidence shows that a child is innocent and does not have the capacity to plan a crime like an adult would do. A child does not even understand what is right and wrong because they do not have …show more content…
In PBS’ “Stickup Kid”, a man named Alonza Thomas was threatened with a gun by a man and was ordered to rob a store when he was trying to go back home. Alonza tried and failed to rob the store and was charged as an adult and given 13 years of jail time. This evidence shows how unfairly he was charged for a crime he was forced to do. Alonza had no choice but to commit the crime because the man put him into a position between life and death and Alonza had no choice but to save his own life. In Adam Foss’ TED talk the speaker says, “In the fall of 2009, a young man was arrested...He was 18 years old..He had his sights set on college but his part time minimum-wage job wasn’t providing the financial support he needed to enroll in school...In a series of bad decisions he stole 30 laptops from a store and sold them on the Internet.”(Adam Foss). This evidence explains the fact that juveniles are not dangerous because this juvenile did not want to hurt anyone in particular. He needed the extra money to help himself afford college but made a bad choice doing so. A lot of people may say that juveniles deserve to pay for their crimes no matter what their intentions were because they decided to break the law but is it is not logical to charge a juvenile that was threatened with a gun or that wanted to pay for an education with an excessive amount of jail time by
In the April of 2007, Brendan Dassey of Manitowoc County, Wisconsin was tried for the assistance and/or direct involvement in the rape and murder of Teresa Halbach, a 25 year-old photographer. However, he was only sixteen years of age, whereas he was tried as an adult, as eighteen or older. Is it moral to put a minor’s liberty on the line as if they were a full-grown, mature adult? This essay will elaborate why Dassey was not at the level of maturity to face the consequences of an adult criminal. First and foremost, Dassey was, as mentioned above, a sixteen year-old, meaning that he is still a child, a minor by U.S. law.
In a rehabilitation space for tailored treatments per child to help them make decisions that would not throw their lives away. This shows an attorney who experienced a similar juvenile case strongly believes that kids can be taught to be a better person due to their age. The attorney does not want the young offender to throw their lives away over one choice they made. Working with them to find the cause of choosing to do the crime and deal with it to prevent any further crime than being sentenced as an adult . Child offenders are kids who act according to what is happening to them and can be taught to deal with it in the right manner.
What if your loved one was savagely killed by a teenager with no remorse? Juveniles should be convicted as adults for ferocious crimes because even though they are “kids” they kill innocent people and should get punished for the crime they committed. Teenagers commit gruesome crimes like murder and knowing what they are makes the situation far worse. In the article “Kids are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes” the author Jennifer Jenkins talks about the teenagers that committed gory murders against innocent people that didn’t deserve to die like a road animal. For example, a 13 year old shot to death an english teacher.
Garinger, Gail. ¨Juveniles Don 't Deserve Life Sentences.¨ New York Times 15 Mar. 2012, New York ed.: A35. Print Jenkins, Jennifer Bishop.
Cox states that, “[Miller] keeps attending the hearings, each one forcing him to relive his life’s worst day, because of the risk that Spencer could be set free” (Cox 2019). This example demonstrates the trauma and PTSD that have affected the victims' lives forever, especially if the offender has not been guaranteed a life sentence. On the other hand, some may argue that child offenders are not fully capable of understanding the severity of their actions, because their brains are not fully developed. Therefore, it would be fundamentally tragic for a child to be incarcerated in an adult jail cell. While it may be true that an underdeveloped brain is a factor in child offenses, there have been studies that reveal children showing no remorse for their actions, therefore they would likely continue killing people if they are set free.
The criminal justice system was created in order to punish people who choose to break the law. Some people believe they are above the law and decided to do whatever they like regardless of the consequences. Children and adults are both responsible for the actions they commit. The criminal justice should tried children as adults for committing felonies because a crime is a crime regardless of the age of the individual. This can be fulfilled by punishing juvelives with the correct sentence, by seeing that they know their actions lead to consequence and they have the proper process for a teen to be tried as adult.
When teen felons choose to act without thinking, they are putting other people’s lives at risk. They need to be charged as adults because the victims of the crimes will not be given the justice they deserve when they have to worry about that criminal harming them again. Although some people think that sending a juvenile through adult court gives them no hope, they should have given this a little thought before committing the crime. Teens need to think about the consequences and how their actions affect others before they act. When choosing between putting a violent adolescent in prison and taking the chance of letting them commit that crime again, it is most suitable to let the teen be tried as an adult and to place them in prison.
Juveniles should be tried as adults with life without parole but only in certain cases: depending on their motive or modus operandi, their crime, and criminal background. Motivation Scandalous kids who commit crimes for unreasonable motives should most definitely have life without the possibility of parole. In some cases, they’re just doing what they think is best. Jacob Ind, a 15 year old from Colorado, was beaten and sexually molested by his step father. His mother abused him as well.
Juvenile Justice Essay In the United States, there have been many cases where a juvenile would be found guilty and be tried as an adult. There are other cases where those juveniles are tried as adult forever. I am against charging juveniles as adults when they commit violent crimes, the juveniles lose many educational opportunities and the adult system is far too dangerous for the young juveniles. Juveniles are also young kids but only the fact that they do not get the same amount of education or experience that other teens gain.
Therefore, when a person argues that a juvenile was not aware of their crime is a discrediting claim. In 1990 in the city of Chicago, a couple expecting their first child were murdered in cold blood in the hands of a juvenile teen. The teen shot both the husband and the wife who pleaded for their lives and the life of their unborn child. Author of “Juvenile Justice Information Exchange”, Jennifer Jenkins states, “He reported to a friend, who testified at his trial, about his ‘thrill kill’ that he just wanted to ‘see what it would feel like to shoot someone’”. This killer was aware of his crime and was aware of who his victims were due to planning the murders months before.
In our society, crimes are being committed not only by adults but by juveniles as well. By law as soon as a person turns 18 they are considered to be an adult. So what if an adult and a juvenile were to commit the same crime yet were sentenced differently simply based on the fact that one is a child and one is an adult? Juveniles are committing violent crimes just as adults and should be given the equal treatment and sentencing as adults receive. Juveniles aren’t completely ignorant as everyone seems to think.
The ones in the juvenile system often reoffend and end up back in the same place. If the juveniles aren’t tried in adult court for serious crimes their punishment won’t be as long and they will commit the crime again and again. The crimes that the children commit would probably go down if they are tried in the adult court. Some of the children that were transferred to criminal court were more likely to be convicted and receive periods of incarceration. If juveniles aren’t tried in adult court they get off of the crime they committed easier.
Although many people view kids as a symbol of innocence and purity, many of their actions signify otherwise. The age of 18, which by law states people as adults, is more like a guideline when it comes to everyday activities. When a heinous crime is committed by one of these underaged citizens, the same punishment should definitely be applied, taking into consideration the seriousness of the crime and the victim. Thompson states that kids should not be tried as adults because their brain is not developed as an adult’s brain is. That study does not specifically explain why juveniles act the way they do.
But this actually disproves juvenile advocates reliance on the “underdeveloped brain” argument. If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world(Jenkins 91). This is something that doesn’t happens, you won’t be seeing teens around the world murdering people. Brain development is just something people don’t understand how it really works and use this argument to try to lower criminals culpability.
Can you imagine waking up behind closed walls and bars? Waking up to see your inmate who is a 45-year-old bank robber and you are a 14-year-old minor who made a big mistake. This is why minors who have committed crimes should not be treated the same as adults. Some reasons are because the consequences given to minors in adult court would impact a minor’s life in a negative way. If a minor is tried through a juvenile court, they have a greater chance of rehabilitation.