In the movie Nightjohn directed by Charles Burnett their were many differences than the book Nightjohn by Gary Paulsen. The differences are minimal and sometimes would not even be noticed. Most movies would be very boring if they would be the same as the book. In the book all the characters are different than they are in the movie. One character is Mrs.Waller the wife of Clel Waller. Mrs. Waller is a lot more kind in the movie than in the book. Also in the movie Mrs. Waller is shown more. In the next paragraphs I will talk about the similarities and differences from the book Nightjohn and the movie Nightjohn. The main difference from the book and the movie are the characters like Mr. Clel Waller. Mr. Waller is more of a jerk in the movie …show more content…
Waller’s little son. In the book there are many other differences like Sarny getting sold at the end of the movie. In the book Nightjohn was bought for 1000 dollars and in the movie Nightjohn was bought for 50 dollars. Their are many similarities in the book like Delie known as mammy. In the book and movie mammy takes care of Sarny. Also in the book and movie Sarny learns letters from Nightjohn. I liked both the movie Nightjohn and the book Nightjohn. I liked the movie more because the movie more action. By action I mean there was more going on like Mr. Waller going into the church with his rifle. Also the little things that caught my attention like when Sarny screamed after Nightjohn lost his finger and when Mr. Waller made Mrs. Waller slap Sarny. In the book their was less things going on, their was less descriptions, and it was not as specific. I liked the movie more than the book because in the movie you can see how the characters looked. In the movie you can see the kind of person each character is like if they were nice or mean. Also in the movie you could see the pain in a slave’s face after they were whipped or if the got their finger cut
Another difference is that the book is much more gruesome than the movie. In the movie when Pawley sneaks out, Waller whips his back a few times. That is a very painful punishment but compared to the book it isn't that bad. In the book when Pawley didn't make it back in time Waller let the dogs have him.
The most significant change from the book to the film was that in the movie they add a visual on Dally's robbery while in the book it really doesn’t explain this or give us a good visual on what happen, and this is significant because it can explain and give us a good visual on what had happen making us understand Dallys emotion after Johnny's death and it shows why he was chased by the cops and shot down. In the book, author S.E. Hinton doesn’t give us much of a description on the robbery possibly, taking away the emotion from Dally after the death of johnny. This makes it a little harder to understand the circumstances of Dally after or during the robbery. Francis Ford Coppola adds the robbery into the movie adding emotion and the mental pain that Dally was going
However, there are very distinct differences between the book and movie; such as characters, the setting, and typical events throughout. The illustration between the characters was an immediate distinct variation. An elderly fragile man named Faber had secretly read books behind the government and had also many other responsibilities. He had also helped
Agatha Christie 's And Then There Were None, is a well known novel that was made into a famous movie, Ten Little Indians. There are many differences between the book and the movie. Some of the differences are, the change of the title, setting, character names, and the way the characters died.
In the book he was portrayed a tough character with a “formal” type of relationship with Faye when in the movie he was more like a neutral individual with a non formal kind of relationship with Faye. I think that most of the characters from the book were similar to the characters from the movie. In the movie they tried to simplify the story of “ The Day of the Locust” by summing the main scenes and creating a mix in the order of how the story was described; changing the life and the personality of certain
If you plan to watch the movie, the book may help you understand more about the plot. As far as the character traits go, the characters seem much more alive in the movie. In the book, lennie seems more as a person that didn't really get an education, and just wasn't smart. In the movie, the actor that plays Lennie portrays him as a more mentally ill character. However, there are similarities from the book to the movie; Lennie looking up to George like brother, Curly being a tightly wound “tough guy”, and his wife seeming more like a “tart” as they say in both the movie and the book.
Review: In the movie there are many differences some that affect the perception of the topic that is underlined in the book. Such as when Jem, Scout and Dill snuck onto the Radleys lawn and porch, but got scared and tried escaping and Jem's pants got stuck in the book Mr Radley shot his gun to scare them off initially which made them run and Jem when back when it was dark out to retrieve his pants but, in the movie when Jem’s pants got stuck he got home with scout and ran back
To begin the characters between the movie and the book have similarities and differences. A similarity between the characters is that all the characters are the same in both the book and the movie
The movie shows some character development in the characters, but some were hit or miss. For example, Mrs. Bennett in the movie shows how much she's passionate getting her daughters marry. In movie and the book, Mrs. Bennett loves to brag about how pretty her daughters are. In one part of the movie where Mr. Bingley purposed to Jane, Mrs. Bennett and her daughters except for Elizabeth was trying to listen into Mr. Bingley and Jane’s conversation. It shows that Mrs. Bennett wants to know everything about everyone, but in the book it didn't shows a lot of characteristics towards Lydia, Kitty, and Mary.
The Devil’s Arithmetic Book vs. Movie Essay The book and movie versions of The Devil’s Arithmetic by Jane Yolen both had many pros and cons. However, the more preferable version goes to the book. The book had far more interesting and suspenseful moments. With the book having better characters, scenes, and themes, there is no point in arguing which adaptation of The Devil’s
The Narrative Of The Life Of Fredrick Douglass and Trouble Don’t Last Fredrick Douglass and Trouble don’t last are book genres that most people would not even try to approach, mostly because of how it is about slavery. As we all know most slavery books are not written by slaves but the book Fredrick Douglass was written by Fredrick Douglass himself, he himself was a slave. The Book Trouble Don’t Last was not exactly written by a slave nor by a black person either.
There are details left out of the movie that were in the book, the movie doesn 't demonstrate the ongoing theme of hunger as well as the book does, and the the movie does a better job with
But you really don't know what they look like. So I will be comparing them. I like the movie better because, as I said in my intro, you can actually see the characters. The book you have to make up what the characters look like. Which can be fun, but sometimes they don't give good enough details on how they look.
There are many differences made in the movie and the book to simplify the plot to save time. Majority of the simplifications being made do not affect the story, but have a different way of portraying each chapter. The movie and the book portray the messages in different ways with the same meaning. What happened in the beginning of the movie was that Huck was getting into a fight with a kid and he soon discovered Pap’s footprint, while in the beginning of the book Huck being civilized by Widow Douglas.
I enjoyed the movie better than the book. It included just the right amount of action scenes, description words, and details from the story. The story was amazing but I like seeing things more than reading them. I usually like the movies better than the book.