In his book, Ernest May sets out to show a new perspective of what influenced the creation of the Monroe Doctrine. While reviewing the writings of John Quincy Adams, May was struck with the question of why the Monroe Doctrine was crafted, thus prompting his research into the policy (viii). With France attempting to restore the monarchy in Spain and the establishment of the Holy Alliance, the United States needed to solidify its foreign policy. May begins his book by describing the events surrounding Great Britain’s offer to the United States to have a unified response to expansion into the Americas. He then outlies the major players of the formation of the policy, including President James Monroe, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, Secretary …show more content…
After setting the stage, Ernest May outlines the foreign politics that were related to the Monroe Doctrine. Chief among them was the possibility of French intervention into the revolution in Spain. May then switches gears and discusses the domestic politics that may have influenced the Monroe Doctrine, led by the looming 1824 election. He outlines the positions that each of the four candidates for the 1824 election, as well as Senator Andrew Jackson, felt compelled to take in order to appease their respective constituencies. These considerations, both foreign and domestic, would weigh heavily on the minds of President Monroe and his cabinet as they crafted this foreign policy over a series of meetings. Eventually, Great Britain’s offer would be rejected and the President would put forth a policy that warned against any expansion in the United …show more content…
At the same time, he clearly shows how much weight the domestic politics, and in particular the election, had on the decisions of the Monroe Administration. May gives a detailed picture of the domestic and international events and actors, which effectively sets the stage for his argument. Other than a few uses of words such as “cisatlantic”, May’s writing is very simple to read and understand (218). Because the subject matter is a global affairs issue, it would behoove the reader to have a basic understanding of the global events of the time. May does an excellent job of returning to primary sources for understanding the context of the events. For example, he often quotes the speeches of the candidates during the election of 1824, for an insight into the stances on foreign policy
The Monroe Doctrine was an expression of nationalism as it declared the United States’s intention to stay out of European affairs and it forced Europe to not interfere in the Americas. Firstly, the United States declared it would stay out of European affairs, wars, and conflicts, signaling an inward focus. However, the United States also threatened Europe when it declared it would go to war in case any European nation attempted further colonization or interference in the Western hemisphere. Metaphorically speaking, the US built a wall between the Americas and Europe, impeding any military or political interference. Even though the US did not have the power to enforce this at the time, it was carving its path to dominate nations in Latin America
At first the Latin American nations saw this as favorable, because they saw that the U.S. could not do anything alone if moving along without the backing of Britain. The military and political power allowed the Monroe Doctrine to be brought about. This doctrine had combined with much of the ideas of Manifest Destiny. Theodore Roosevelt’s Corollary was a great extension of this doctrine, it upturned the original meaning and justified independent intervention of the U.S. in Latin America.
His most famous piece of legislature, the Monroe Doctrine, came at a time when Eurasia was in a state of turmoil. In 1821, the Russian Tzar, Alexander I, declared that any territory above the 51st parallel would belong solely to Russia. This was an enormous threat for the sovereignty of the young United States since Russia colonized and governed Alaska since 1784 and had begun expanding southward toward the Oregon territory. Moreover, the Tzar banned any foreign ships from coming closer than 115 miles off the coast of the “Russian America”. and claimed a monopoly on fur hunting, fishing, and all trading in that region.
Monroe achieved in preserving and furthering the liberty Americans strived for, as well as expanding the size of the U.S. By signing the Florida Purchase Treaty, Monroe managed to gain Spanish Florida as well as setting a larger border by signing the Treaty of 1818. In addition to broadening America’s border’s, James’s legendary Monroe Doctrine boosted America’s freedom and stature to a great extent. The Monroe Doctrine made a great change to America’s foreign policy - it declared an end to European nations colonizing or interfering with states in North or South
Monroe develops the atmosphere of a ‘defensive’ emotion through his use of tone. The rhetoric justifies the action of America logically because he presents his arguments on real events occurred. He is not asking the audience, but he is telling of what he is trying to do. “In the War between those new governments and Spain we have declared our neutrality at the time of their recognition, and to this we have adhered and shall continue to
When the speech states “We do not wish to fight her either with arms or with hostile arrangements of trade”, this shows how Wilson tries to turn away from war with his Fourteen Points and by using this type of rhetoric, the congress not only agrees with Wilson because his statements are logical, but also because it appeals to their
Thus in second chapter Haynes describes the matter of on-going pro-bank and contra-bank debates and collision of the interests of supporting groups that were involved in B.U.S. case. In seventh chapter, the author gives detailed account on annexation of Oregon and Texas. He explains the basis of the disagreement between England and America about Oregon territory. Haynes thoroughly analyzes the status of Texas at that time, and the claims that Mexico and the United States had over it. Further he discusses possible consequences for every country involved into conflict, if England decided to
At the time, the Monroe Doctrine had little impact on European Powers, but it is significant to the U.S foreign policy because it provided justification for the following presidents to intervene in Latin America during the 20th century. Manifest Destiny was the belief that God had given Americans the right to spread west across the continent; as a result, there was more territory gain. The Mexican- American War started in 1846 and was fought for two years over land; it started as as the result of the annexation of Texas, a boundary dispute and the U.S’s desire to obtain Mexico’s northern territories. In 1848, America wins big by gaining California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming.
The title of the essay in an appropriate description of Jefferson’s diplomatic strategy. Knowing American military capabilities of fighting a war against France and Spain, its domestic problem of presidential power and the mortal sin of alliance with Britain, this essay progresses the Louisiana situation up to the the purchase of Louisiana; a feat often regarded as on of the greatest triumphs of America diplomacy.
American history is full of events that have changed the curse of its history, some more recent than others, an often overviewed war or conflict is the Mexican war, probably because it was only 13 years before of one of the most bloodshed periods and important periods of this country 's history, the Civil War; the Mexican War might have nit had as big as an impact as that of the Civil War, but nonetheless it was a period that is certainly important, we can also think that no war is ever unimportant (Shaara,10). Since the Louisiana purchase, there was a fervor for expansion among the American people, in 1845 the then independent nation of Texas was annexed by the United states (Shaara, 12). But there were several doubts about what was the real
The Monroe Doctrine was a speech given in 1823 by James Monroe, the 5th president of the United States, to the U.S. Congress concerning European presence in the Western Hemisphere. Monroe was becoming continuously concerned about European influence in the region. While the primary audience for this message was Congress, the intended audience was all European powers, including Russia, and Latin America. The events in Latin America before and after the Spanish-American War will be used as an example of the imperial reach by the U.S. The United States, ironically, became an imperial power through its mission outlined in the Monroe Doctrine to end European colonialism and imperialism.
His three major ones were the Monroe Doctrine and his acquisition of Florida from Spain. With the Monroe Doctrine, James Monroe established that no European power would be allowed to interfere in the western hemisphere and any attempts to do so would be seen as a threat. This Doctrine established the U.S. foreign policy for many years and defined American interests in the world. With Britain backing Monroe with his policy, no European nation dared to enter that area. Monroe also established neutrality with Latin America.
The Role of Matthew Thornton “Friends and brethren, you must all be sensible that the affairs of America have, at length, come to a very affecting and alarming crisis.” Some of the first words of the Revolution spoken by Matthew Thornton. Newly appointed President of the Provincial Congress , Matthew Thornton was a known leader, driven by religious freedom and justice. Migrating from Ireland to escape persecution, Thornton was in America was to be free, and when the British conflicted with this he was not going to merely observe.
The Monroe Doctrine was the Idea of the fifth president Of the United states James Monroe. It was passed on December 2, 1823, in the 7th annual message to congress. The policy was designed to show the separation of the New World from Europe. The Monroe doctrine stated that the Western Hemisphere could no longer be colonized by European countries and they were independent. It also stated that the United States will not interfere in any business of the Europeans or its European colonies.
One major tenant of the “system of peace” described by Stella Ghervas was the suppression of internal dissent and the maintenance of law and order from revolution in collaboration with all major European states. This idea is best expressed in the Troppau Protocol, which stated that “the powers bind themselves, by peaceful means, or if need be, by arms, to bring back the guilty state into the bosom of the Great Alliance.” However, despite attempts by the so-called “Congress system” to maintain the peace, in reality, these attempts always relied on the tactic approval of the British and must have fell within the scope of the preservation of the British-led balance of power. A prime example of this in action is the British reaction to the Latin American wars of independence. When the powers of the Holy Alliance sought to bring back the renegade Spanish colonies back under European control, the British refused to do so, with British foreign minister George Canning remarking that “Spanish America is free … and if we do not mismanage our affairs she is English”.