The adaption of the 1967 film “The Taming of the Shrew.” by Franco Zeffirelli, was a good adaption to the original play “The Taming of the Shrew.” by William Shakespeare, because the dialogue, and the scenes are followed well. Although going from a book to a film, you will always have some differences. In this case the alterations between the film, and the original play were minuscule. When you are reading a book, and then watching a movie, you can sometimes find yourself confused as to what is going on. In watching the film “ The Taming of the Shrew.” I did not find myself getting lost very often. William Shakespeare is a writer, whom writes plays and also some poems. There is not a whole lot of accurate background to Shakespeare. His actual birth date is unknown. Shakespeare is the famous author of many different plays and poems. He began his writing in the 1500’s, and moved on to theatrical work as well. According to Barnet, “ eighteen of his plays were published during his lifetime.” ( Barnet). Although according to Orgel “The film includes some minor departures from the text of the book,” (Orgel), it is still a fairly good adaption. When making a film that director most …show more content…
They were all cheerful, and fun to watch and read about. I liked that Zefferilli kept this going in his film. They play is very enjoyable in both the film and the book. The film “The Taming of the Shrew,” by Franco Zeffirelli left of the induction that was in the “The Taming of the Shrew,” by William Shakespeare. Some people are confused as to why Shakespear included the induction into his play. As the induction did not have anything to do with the story of Petruchio ( played by Richard Barton), and Kate ( played by Liz Taylor). According to Steven Orgel, “ Franco Zeffirelli solved the problem to ignore the induction altogether, and focus instead on the story of Petruchio and Kate.”
I might complain sometimes that I don’t like it when a movie changes a book but most of the times it’s ok because it can make the story more fun, interesting and less boring. Or if you don’t understand the book or play then the movie might help in understanding what the story is telling the viewer
The basis of Shakespeare’s play is still mainly transferable into the late 1990’s when the movie was released, along with almost 20 years after that into today’s culture. Although the basis of the play is still relatable, there are obviously a lot of points in Shakespeare’s original play that are not relatable because of how society has changed and what is now seen as acceptable compared to what was acceptable in Shakespeare’s time when the play Taming of the Shrew was
This shows how Ross will hold his loyalty to whomever is of power. To conclude, there are many similarities and differences in any film adaptation of a beloved novel or play. However, it is up to the audience to decide which version they enjoyed
From Sexism to Social Reformation Many actions and ideologies of the characters in The Taming of the Shrew create an overarching conflict between comedy and sexism for most readers. Specifically, the relationships between the men and women introduce controversial topics such as obedience and love which must be questioned thoroughly. The conditions of Petruchio and Katherine’s marriage was more “traditional” in the sense that it was primarily patriarchal, and that Kate was expected to be subservient and obedient. While this is sexist, on the surface, this was not the intended meaning behind the works.
Taming of the Shrew is a dramatic comedy in which several suitors try to captivate and marry a beautiful woman named Bianca. However, the suitors stumble upon an issue; Bianca’s older sister, Kate, is not married. Bianca is only eligible for marriage if Kate is married, so the suitors set out to find Kate a man. During Taming of the Shrew, the suitors of both Kate and Bianca are dishonest and deceive the sisters using disguises and mind games which results in a breakdown of all the characters.
Throughout history, women have always been considered inferior to men. Women are typically supposed to stay home and care for the children, quieter than men, do not need an education, and are supposed to listen and do what they are told. The men are the ones in charge. They are “always at the top”, expected to work to provide for their family, and tell their wives what to do. When reading “Taming of the Shrew” by Shakespeare and watching “10 Things I hate About You” directed by Gil Junger, the stereotypes and gender role of Katherine (Kat) and the sisterly relationship between Katherine (Kat) and Bianca come across.
In Shakespeare’s play, Taming of the Shrew, and in the movie, Ten Things I Hate About You, many similarities and differences can be pointed out. The play has many characteristics that are still happening to this day and will most likely happen in the future. While looking at the characters in the play and in the movie, you will see that society's view of certain people have not changed much. Why is this play, written 423 years ago, still relevant today and will be long into the future? There are some similarities between the movie and the play.
The movie does contain traditional views on dating but it also promotes independence among young women, going in the opposite direction of the original play “ I guess in this society, being male and an asshole makes you worthy of our time.” 10 Things I hate about you. Ultimately both stories The Taming of the Shrew and 10 Things I hate about you are similar, especially in major plot elements. Their differences are in minor details, mainly due to the time period, but still impact the story significantly.
Many of the themes and values stayed the same but in order to represent and appeal to the modern teen some of these had to be altered. Without these alterations the movie would have seemed unrealistic and the intended audience would not have related to the film. To stay true to the basic plot of The Taming of the Shrew, characters were kept similar having parallel personality traits. For example, Kate and Kat were similar both being independent and intelligent individuals with their own morals and not caring what anyone else thought of them.
Gil Jungers appropriation of Shakespeare's ‘Taming of the Shrew’ into the modern teen film ‘10 things i hate about you’ is a successful appropriation because it appeals to a contemporary audience. Appropriation is when composers use other texts to construct new texts by appropriating parts of other texts. In appropriating the play Junger has kept some aspects of the recongines and connections which makes this an engaging film. The storyline in the drama ‘The Taming Of The Shrew’ has been appropriated into the film ‘10 Things I Hate About You’.
Social concerns undergo metamorphosis in their portrayal, according to the composers various contextual influences. ‘The Taming of the Shrew’ was a play written by Shakespeare in the Elizabethan era where men were considered to be superior to women. This patriarchal society heavily influenced Shakespeare’s play, as it reflected the traditional values of the Elizabethan era. In contrast, the 20th century had drastically changed, with the first and second waves of feminism, which helped to remove inequalities and gender expectations. However Junger, the director of ‘10 Thing I Hate About You’ has kept the basis of the film based on Shakespeare’s play.
Shakespeare’s famous play Taming of the Shrew took place during the Italian Renaissance in the city of Padua. During this period of time, Italy was not one unified power as we see today. It was divided into many districts of Italy called city-states. The most influential being Florence, Venice, Milan, and Rome. These states function much like small nations, they had capital cities, their own currency, and wars between them were very common.
The most popular comedic device used in The Taming of the Shrew is witty language. Everyone bickers back and forth at each other for the entire play. The language is comical, bordering on outrageous sometimes. It keeps audiences intrigued that are reading for the romance and hoops in audiences that wouldn’t normally stick around for a strictly romantic play.
William Shakespeare William Shakespeare was an actor, poet, and playwright, but he did so much more than that. He changed psychology, the english language, theater, writing, and created thousands of words we still use today. William Shakespeare wrote and acted in his plays during the Renaissance, which was a time from the 1300s until the 1600s when ideas of society changed. During the Renaissance, a new concept started to form that changed society which was humanism.
Since he lived in Elizabethan England life was very hard for him because he wasn’t born into a family of wealth or nobility and he didn’t have a great education. Shakespeare wrote thirty-eight plays, one hundred and fifty-four sonnets and two narrative poems. He produced his best-known works between 1589 and 1613, and from then onward they are considered classics. Ben Jonson is regarded as the second most important English playwright after William Shakespeare. He was born in Westminster in late 1572 and died on August 6, 1637.