Activity to be Audited
5.4.3 Request Form Information:
a) Does the request form contain:
I. Forename and surname
II. Gender
III. Date of birth
IV. Address
V. Hospital number
b) Name or other unique identifier of clinician or other person legally authorized to request examinations & Destination of report:
c) Type of primary sample and the anatomic site of origin, where appropriate;
d) Examinations requested;
e) Clinical information relevant to the patient, which should include gender and date of birth, as a minimum, for interpretation purposes;
f) Date and time of primary sample collection;
g) Date and time of receipt of sample by the laboratory.
If this is a test where information for patients is required e.g. for sample collection, is this
…show more content…
If the method has been recently changed have the relevant change management procedures been followed?
If the method has been recently changed, resulting in a change in results or interpretation have the users been notified?
5.6 Ensuring Quality of examination results:
Are quality control procedures included in the documented procedure available for the examination?
Has this document been acknowledged by all necessary staff?
Are there acceptance criteria for the IQC of this analysis?
Are there instructions of what to do in event of IQC failure?
In the event of an IQC failure were any patient samples run? If so have they been re-examined one IQC passed?
Is EQA satisfactory for this examination?
Is there a documented procedure relating to the EQA participation?
Is EQA processed in the same manner as patient samples?
Was the last EQA report reviewed by relevant staff?
5.8 & 5.9 Reporting & release of Results:
Have all members of this laboratory acknowledged the current revision of the department’s own resrel document?
Does this document include a process for notifying the requester when an examination is delayed & could compromise patient
They should be hold accountable for any breach in protocols. • Present format for electronic documentation does not allow for comprehensive clinical documentation during follow-up visit. Efforts should be made to upgrade the electronic medical record system to the standard of that expected for a medical center and research institute. This is to allow for proper documentation according to the industrial standard, and easy retrieval of patient’s information for clinical research. There is a need to employ a clinical documentation improvement specialist (CDIS) in this
a. The initial evaluation examination is part of standard care. Which includes assessing range of motion, endurance, anatomical planes, the Health Survey, and Patient History Database form. 4. What happens with screen failures?
What were the results? Were they statistically significant (i.e., p0.20) What was the clinical importance of the results? Report the effect size if included in the study.
To evaluate the change, results were monitored on a monthly basis which was not sufficient to reach the goal of 100% compliance. The initial change was effective in increasing the compliance rate from 68% to 95.6%. An additional PDSA is needed to meet the goal of 100% compliance. This can be achieved with additional reporting on a weekly basis, with a focus on individual staff or primary care teams.
I had to backtrack and let the participant know what happened. I made the error and gave them the contact for filing a complaint. No complaint was made but do realize how traumatic that could be if the bloodwork came back in a upsetting matter and the participant was not forgiving. Standard 7: As an
I took the Kaplan Integrated test for NUB 440(Medical Surgical) and these were the remediation topics that emerged from the questions I answered incorrectly: multiple sclerosis, lidocaine, peritoneal dialysis, Parkinson’s disease, hip fracture, pneumothorax, prednisone, type 2 diabetes, detached retina, buck’s traction, closed head injury, transesophageal echocardiogram, benign prostatic hypertrophy, cystic fibrosis, glomerulonephritis, cardiac dysrhythmias, thyroidectomy, pressure ulcer, intracranial tumor, cataracts, hepatitis A, stroke, epilepsy, somogyi effect, pancreatitis, meningitis. During my review and analysis, I discovered that I changed 6 incorrect answers to correct answer which was to my advantage. In addition, I changed 1 correct
Overall, incomplete documentation and delinquent medical records cause inaccurate reimbursement and results in inaccurate gross revenue to the hospital. It can have a negative impact on the hospital budgeting and financial planning process for the hospital. It is for this purpose that every healthcare institution should be purposeful on reviewing the accuracy and completeness in clinical documentation, no matter the cost. Even though, for most physicians, most of their time is focused on the actual care of the patient and there is little to no time to devote to extensive documentation, it is imperative to understand patient care includes both the one-to-one attention and the documentation of said treatment.
(2010). Johnson (2015) and Evans et al. (2012) discuss the overall process of implementation of a bedside report along with outcomes. Johnson (2015) however, additionally highlights Lewin’s change model in the study. Friesen, White, and Byers (2008) reveal issues with different methods of report and their implications and Racco (2014) discusses the bedside safety check process.
Ernest Codman’s attempt to implement an “end result system” responsible for monitoring patient health for one year post treatment as a way to ensure care and improve future treatment protocols radically transformed medical care standards. His contributions could be noted through the following records: -Hospital correspondence: highlights Codman’s attempts to change hospital standards through visitations and discussions as well as the lack of record keeping at the time. -Patient Data and Research: displays Codman’s effort to standardize record keeping -Patient
The author should be a lot more specific when they talk about that the new test
Lastly, the person’s state of mind could vastly affect the outcome of the results. With that being said, the results should be used as a rough gauge rather than definitive
Then utilizing the results the clinic can drill down to the patients receiving beta-blockers, diabetes (eye & kidney exam) to determine if the correct interventions were being provided by the health care physician and identify gaps in treatment and then ensure the physician receives reminders on preventable measures to close quality care gaps and improve the quality of care provided to patients (Eddy, Pawlson, Schaff, Peskin, Shcheprov, Dziuba & Eng, 2008). I completed a chart audit of over 200 med advantage patient records this week utilizing CPT codes,ICD-9, progress notes, and lab results for HEDIS measures for HgbA1c (9 every 3 months), Diabetic Eye Exams (yearly), Colonoscopy Exam (every 10 years-unless indicated otherwise), Mammograms (yearly after age 50), BP (controlled < 100), and medication adherence (beta blockers, ACE/ARB, cholesterol, diabetic, etc) and my findings would be reported to BCBS, Humana, Clear River, Health Springs and NCQA. The yearly eye diabetic eye exam can detect retinopathy and help ensure early treatment to prevent blindness, control of BP can reduce MI infraction while yearly colonoscopy and mammograms can detect early signs of cancer and HbbA1c can help detect and identify gaps in diabetes
How would they get that information? They would pull your medical data and seem for all those points. If the information is just not appropriate, you could be presented a medicine that would trigger extra damage than fantastic! Subsequent time you see your physician or are in the hospital, consult to see a duplicate of your data and be certain the information is
However, external ICD-10 testing can help gather valuable feedback. But, there may be issues regarding its arrangements with healthcare
For this Audit the author took the following steps in developing questions for the Audit tool as guided by The National Institute for Clinical Excellence