Passed on September 25, 1789 and ratified on December 15, 1791 by Congress, the eighth amendment has been present in the United States for quite some time. Over time, the amendment has morphed and interpreted differently. In the Constitution it states, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted”. In the 1990s, individuals referenced the eighth amendment when discussing capital punishment or the death penalty. Death sentences were most frequent during the 1900s, resulting in some individuals declaring that it went against the amendment (Source A). Since then, opinions on the death penalty have fluctuated, some claim that is barbarous while others deem it to be necessary. The …show more content…
Hammurabi was the king of Babylon during 1792-1750 BCE and he created Hammurabi’s Code. In this code, there were many rules, which all followed under the phrase, “an eye for an eye,”. This means that what one does to another, it must be done back to them. One rule in Hammurabi’s code was, “If a man knock out the teeth of his equal, his teeth shall be knocked out.” Meaning, since one individual hurt another, that person shall be hurt too. This rule proved to be highly immoral, because it basically led one achieving and performing their revenge on another. Sentencing an individual to death for a crime they had committed, whether it be murder, rape, or another heinous crime, is using Hammurabi’s code. Individuals on death row were put there because members of the court believed that they had committed a crime worthy of death. By sentencing them to death, the court is committing a murder as well, even if it is of a guilty individual. Murdering or sentencing one to death row is not just, even if the individual is guilty of treason. By saying the individual on trial shall not live because they murdered another, this reflects back on the decision makers. It deems those making the decisions hypocrites. The court members are choosing whether one lives or dies, and if they choose the death option they are performing the exact crime the individual could be on trial for. Murder. The court’s final …show more content…
There will be some individuals who stand behind it, some who do not, and some who prefer other options like solitary confinement. Sentencing one to death out of fear of what they might be or what they could become is not a reason to end someone’s life. Those who are on death row have to spend days, months, or even years waiting; waiting to hear if might be released or if their execution date has been set. If an individual has committed such a barbaric crime, the court should not stoop to their level and commit murder. Outsiders, who have never stepped a foot in prison, do not know what it is like. They do not know the conditions, the horrible treatment, or the everlasting days. It’s impossible to know what it is like behind the bars of a prison cell; individuals can only go on what they believe. It says in the Bible that thou shall not kill. Capital punishment is murder, and overall does more bad than
The Eighth amendment causes a big controversial in everyday cases. The 8th amendment is about, no cruel and unusual punishment. This means you can't get severely punished or be punished for no reason. “These bill of rights were written by James Madison.’ ” These bills were ratified in December 15, 1791.
The 8th Amendment You and your friends are trick or treating on Halloween. One friend has the idea to go decorate your neighbor's house with toilet paper. Halfway through you're decorating a police car pulls up on the street. The police officer sentences you and your friends to life in prison.
The Eighth Amendment or Amendment VIII of the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights, and declares that “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” , thus proscribes disproportionate bails , inequitable and degrading to human dignity sanctions for any types of criminal offenses, as well as monetary penalties that are exceptionally high. Amendment VIII is significant because according to the legal system of the United States of America, an individual accused of a crime is “presumed innocent until proven guilty” and therefore, allowing disproportionate bail amounts to be set, would carry the risk of holding innocent people in custody, sometimes
I think that Amendment Eight is important because you have the right to bail, which is very useful in some cases and because if you do something that isn 't even that bad you will just probably get a warning and before this amendment you would probably get put in jail. It states on https://www.google.com/gws_rd=ssl#q=amendment+8+definition, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” This supports my answer because it says that that we now have the right to bail and we are free from cruel and unusual
One day you were sitting on your rocking chair, eating rice and then BOOM the police are banging on your door saying you are going to be sentenced to death for littering a sea sponge. In court you say that that is being against the 8th amendment, but the judge still says you are going to die. So what now? OK. This particular example actually never happened but you are still right, being sentenced to death for a small crime like littering is still against the 8th amendment.
In the article, “The Death Penalty: An Opinion Essay,” written by Hamilton Spectator, states that is the first issue that he mentions is that the justice system is never 100% right all the time. While other situations can be changed by a judge a death penalty is unchangeable. Various times of similar crimes are conferred and diverse sentences are given out. As well as depending on the criminals race the consequences valid on the judge 's opinion.
The 8th Amendment is stated as simply as this: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fins imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” We do know some things about the history of the phrase “cruel and unusual punishments”. In 169, a full century before the ratification of the United States Constitution, England adopted the Bill of Rights that prohibited “cruell and unusuall punishments”. In 1776, George Mason included a prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments in the Declaration of Rights he drafted for he Commonwealth of Virginia. In 1791, the same prohibition became the central component of the 8th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
“‘Death sentences represent less than one-tenth of 1% of prison sentences in the United States…,’” (Von Drehle, 9). Furthermore, death row is just a small fraction of the criminal justice system and can not be based on that alone. For instance, what many don't take into account is the justice systems allows for many states, such as the populous state of New York, to ban the death penalty. (state laws, p1)
The Eighth Amendment is all about punishment. In the Amendment it states, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”, as well as allowing the Death Penalty. I believe this Amendment is right. Because of the fact that cruel and unusual punishment wouldn’t be fun, I believe the Death Penalty should be legal, and excessive fines would be crushing to our economy. Cruel and unusual punishment would not be fun.
All in all, the Eighth Amendment has undergone quite a revolution in the last century. Its significance in the dealings of criminal law are paralleled by law as it quite literally defines criminal law itself. Most, if not all, cases that deal with the civil rights of criminals, such as the vastly influential Miranda v. Arizona case, which introduced the obligation to police officers to read suspects their natural rights, would have never came about if it wasn 't for the case which changed the meaning of cruel and unusual. As time goes on, society as a whole will evolve, hopefully in a more peaceful manner, and as such the Eighth Amendment will evolve alongside society, keeping up with how the public opinion feels about certain things along the way. In the near future, things like the death penalty might become horrific tales of the past to be left just a bad memory, and in the far future, maybe even things like manual labour will be outlawed with the rise of automation making such labour unnecessary.
Even if you're sentenced to death, you're probably not going to get executed. That's why it's not a deterrent,”(Horn). People don't even see the death penalty as a punishment so people aren't afraid of commiting crimes. With how dangerous prisons are with overcrowding they are just costing more money for providing the medical attention the inmates need. ” There have been any number of reports about overcrowded and dangerous prisons, and while the Commission presented its conclusions and recommendations to the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, it's not clear what - if anything - will come of that,”(Horn).
They will have to live with the mental fact that they took away another person's life, when it is not necessary. Death row is inhumane because it causes mental torment. In the U.S., death row inmates usually spend over ten years waiting for their execution and that time has increasingly gotten longer in recent years (“Time” 1). This emotional distress, commonly referred to as death row syndrome, causes many inmates to lose their mind or even commit suicide. Since these death row inmates know that their time is coming to an end, they slowly lose the ability to function properly.
In this paper we will look at several cases in which the 8th Amendment has been used in my opinion unethically to justify everything from gender reassignment surgery to claiming that one was mentally insane in order to get out of facing the death penalty. Excessive Bail The 8th Amendment was written to protect against excessive bail, excessive fines, and the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment on someone accused of a crime (n.a., 2015). Bail varies from state to state; In the case below we see how a person accused of domestic assault is given what he believe is unfair bail and the court opinion of his claim.
Excessive Use of Force Excessive force is when the force exceeds the required amount of force to de-escalate a situation or to safeguard law enforcement or others from any hurt, harm, or danger from an individual. The United States criminal justice system has handled several cases involving the use of excessive force by law enforcement officers, especially during apprehension. The increasing number of such cases creates the necessity to train enforcement officials on how to handle suspects without violating the constitutional rights of the suspects. The United States constitutional rights protect against such force in the Fourth Amendment.
First, I will write about the violation of the human rights. Death penalty is a violation on the most basic human right. It violates that every human being has the right to freedom and life, article 3 in the united nation declaration of the human rights. Humanity