The human concept of reality primarily focuses on what a person sees around them and what they believe they understand. The three concepts that attach themselves to this belief system is thinking, knowing, and finally being. As I journeyed through these concepts I began to see that it is not a simple idea to truly understand reality and my place within it, rather it flows more from the interconnectedness of these three concepts. Once I grasped the individual concepts and began the path towards the full realization of potentiality that these represented I started understanding A. Square in Flatland when he proclaimed “I looked below, and saw with my physical eye all that domestic individuality which I hitherto merely inferred with the understanding. …show more content…
This is much different that the calculative growth where knowledge grows in so far as what is already known. Where calculative growth fails contemplative thought allows a person to go beyond the known and see the potentiality and thus expanding their understanding of the reality they live and their place within the new universe they inhabit. We see Heidegger stating this very concept when he states “When we think through what this is, that a tree in bloom presents itself to us so that we can come and stand face-to-face with it, thing that matters first and foremost, and finally, is not to drop the tree in bloom, but for once let it stand where is stands.” We see that the hardest thing for us to understand when thinking is to simply let the object of thought exist without special considerations. So we do not approach contemplative thinking with a lens of preconceived notion that we force the though into, rather we allow the object to be as it is and we learn the reality of the object. When this reality is achieved we then see our reality expands through understanding and our place in the universe shifts with this …show more content…
Once we learn to think what comes next. When we say control our thinking we begin the process incorrectly and seldom see the true potential of thought do to our own refusal to learn. We prefer then nice and tidy way that our knowledge has been learned and seldom wish to pursue the reality that we may be wrong. We see Aristotle confirming that contemplative thinking is the way to the highest happiness when he states “Now if we take away from a living being action, and still more production, what is left but contemplation? Therefore the activity of God, which surpasses all others in blessedness, most be contemplative; and of human activities, therefore, that which is most akin to this must be most of the nature of happiness.” We see that contemplative thinking is allows mankind to reach towards God and thus allows us to approach a happiness that shows greater potential that that of a happiness of flesh. This creates a desire to continue this way of thinking as we seek what causes pleasure. The truth of this is that we should seek this form of thinking as it allows us to see beyond the common understandings of what reality really is and allows is to see what reality is unfettered and unmolested by preconceived
Nicholson 1 Isaac Nicholson Mrs. Woodard Honors Calculus 14 October 2015 Flatland Synopsis The book Flatland presents a thrilling tale of a two-dimensional shape that has the rare and unique opportunity to visit the lands of other dimensions. The entire book is told from the perspective of a square, and is narrated in the first person limited point of view. It was written by a clergyman in 1884 during the Victorian Era in England. The book as a whole is separated into two sections.
In Flatland by Edwin A. Abbott, chronicles the journey of A. Square through many dimensions. On his journey, he visits and dreams of many different dimensions. While he lives in a two dimensional world, he imagines dimensions ranging from zero all the way to four. The wide range of dimensions he visits presents an interesting dilemma for a book cover designer. How does one portray multiple dimensions, while focusing on a central one, all on the same cover?
We can find what it means to be hidden from the truth, the different forms of knowledge, and telling others about the truth. However, this is not just a topic that we think about on a day to day basis. This is a topic that we face in the long term: What is the real truth? What is the reality of our universe? Why can we think?
Humans themselves are natural, yet the actions they take in an effort to understand the universe are not. They construct definitions, saying that if it is one thing then it is not another. Contrast and opposing forces are essential elements of the comprehension of reality. A knife is taken to the world, chopping and slicing the whole into parts. This process is completed in order to assist with the navigation of its complexities, in order to provide a sense of convenience.
Plato breaks the justification of knowledge down into two types of realms that show what can be known by reason and what can be known by the five senses. These realms, then divided into two other unequal parts based on their clarity and truthfulness, make up what is known as The Divided Line. By understanding The Divided Line we can fully grasp the differences between the perceptual, also known as becoming, realm and the conceptual, also known as being, realm. The perceptual realm is the opinions and beliefs of people or it can be known as the visible realm.
Every individual spends their entire life trying to understand what reality is; however, because reality consist of two forms- perceived reality and actual reality, it is essential that you understand both in order to truly comprehend reality. Perceived reality is one’s perception of reality based on personal experiences and surroundings. Actual reality is actual and definite or the factual aspect of reality. Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave,” Dick Gregory’s “Shame” and Frederick Douglass’ “Learning to Read and Write” illustrate examples of reality being composed of two different perceptions and how the ability to comprehend both is necessary in order to conceptualize
Using this technique, he posits one will eventually find the truth and be on the right path. This summarization can be likened to Conze’s assertion that Buddhist thinkers loved paradox and contradictions. With this, he associates Buddhist thought with
According to Wallace, after a long and tedious day, we become stressed and let our emotions get the best of us. We are wired to think we are the center of the universe. Because of this way of thinking, we blame others for our frustration and stress. In other words, our brain unconsciously switches to our “natural default setting” (Wallace, 199). In order to be able to overcome this way of thinking, it is important to be able to have the “choice of what to think about” (Wallace 199).
These questions and experiments led to many ideas that are now considered to be the standards by which we measure our knowledge of reality. Each reading has similarities with one another. In Plato’s “The Allegory of the Cave”, Descartes “Meditation I of the things of which we may doubt” and in the movie “The Matrix” the authors are asking the question, “Is this
The nature of reality is strange and fleeting by its very nature. We remember isolated events from our past, and often antagonize about a future that is far off. Rarely do we live in the present and enjoy each moment of our existence. This is odd because as far as we know we are finite creatures living in this reality. However, these assumptions are based from observations by our sense perceptions, and I often wonder if these are incorrect assumptions.
It embodies the insight that there is a serious muddle at the centre of the whole of Descartes theory of knowledge. He says that we do not hold a clear idea of the mind to make out much. ‘He thinks that although we have knowledge through the idea of body, we know the mind “only through consciousness, and because of this, our knowledge of it is imperfect” (3–2.7, OCM 1:451; LO 237). Knowledge through ideas is superior because it involves direct access to the “blueprints” for creation in the divine understanding, whereas in consciousness we are employing our own weak cognitive resources that
In his more specific discourse on the nature of happiness, Aristotle comes to the conclusion that happiness lies in the contemplative life because “contemplation is the highest form of activity” (Aristotle 268). Aristotle views the activities of the mind to be the most sophisticated element of human life, and thus he believes the greatest good must come from the greatest aspect of life. In this view of happiness, Aristotle assumes that “happiness is an activity in accordance with virtue,” and that in order to live the contemplative life, one must also live a morally virtuous life (Aristotle 270). This connection between morality and contemplation coincides with Aristotle’s view of the superiority of contemplation over all other human activities.
Mindfulness & Power of our thoughts A strong impact is made on our health and overall well-being by what we think and feel, how we talk to ourselves, and what view we take about what is happening to us, and around us. Mindfulness, in its simplest form, means to be able to pay attention to the present moment, without judgment and criticism. To the things that actually “are”.
In Chapter 5 of “Here I Am,” Schultze discusses the importance of contemplation, a concept that seems so old fashioned; plus, who has time to contemplate anymore? “Some people contemplate by reflecting on a short section of Scripture-- even on a key word, such as salvation, grace or peace. Others recall how good has blessed them in their lifetimes, perhaps focusing each day on one period, event, or relationship. Still others discover that slowly, meaningfully repeating particular prayers encourages contemplation (Schultze 59).” I am going to put contemplation into practice and see where that
This is reflected in The Matrix, when Neo exits the Construct and begins to puke after learning about his new reality, because he does not want to accept that everything he has known is wrong. In Descartes’ thought experiment reality was what ever the evil demon decided to feed to Descartes non-physical body. For the Humans still stuck in the Matrix their reality is the Matrix, for them the Matrix is as real as it gets. There is no way for them to know any other realities. This concept is also reflected in Plato’s allegory of the cave, where prisoners are chained in such a way that they can not move nor turn their head and all they see are shadows cast