“Like and equal are not the same thing at all.” ― Madeleine L’Engle- A Wrinkle In Time. More specifically, A Wrinkle In Time is a book about a girl (Meg), and how her father disappeared. In the book, the government told them he was on a top secret mission, while in the movie, he disappeared after Charles Wallace was born. Meg, Calvin, and Charles work through Camazotz and Uriel to find Meg’s father. This happens in both the story and the movie. Mrs Which, Mrs. Who, and Mrs. Whatsit also helped them on their mission along the way. The story was more powerful than the movie because of its dialogue, setting, and plot.
Following that, The story was better than the movie because of its dialogue. For example, “But Mrs Whatsit came to her and
…show more content…
For instance, “Below them the town was laid out in harsh angular patterns. The houses in the outskirts were all exactly alike, small square boxes painted gray. Each had a small, rectangular plot of lawn in front, with a straight line of dull-looking flowers edging the path to the door. Meg had a feeling that if she could count the flowers there would be exactly the same number for each house. In front of all the houses children were playing. Some were skipping rope, some were bouncing balls. Meg felt vaguely that something was wrong with their play.” (pg.54) Furthermore, In the movie, they had the setting on Camazotz as well. There were houses as well and children bouncing balls. For clarification, the movie had them bouncing balls but they did not explain that IT had hypnotized the kids. The setting on Camazotz shows that the story is better. The setting is powerful because it is showing that the kids are worried and that they need to find their father. They are worried that IT has possessed or hypnotized these kids that are playing and skipping balls in rhythm The children are worried that IT may have done something to their father from IT. The reader finds it powerful because it creates suspense and the children are desperate to find their father. The movie also did not provide any sensory details to explain the planet. The book went more in depth and explained the planet. In the movie, they were kids …show more content…
For reference, “He moved rapidly down the corridor and again held up his hand to make the wall transparent. They looked into another small room or cell. In the center of it was a large, round, transparent column, and inside this column was a man.” (pg.71) Additionally, in the movie, Meg walked up invisible steps to see her father inside a transparent column. In the movie, her father could see and did not have to use Meg’s glasses. This is still the climax in the movie. Specifically, This climax adds meaning to the story. This setting adds meaning to the story because it creates suspension on who the man might be. The three children have been on the planet searching for their father for a long time, and it is possible the man might be their father. The man was trapped inside of the transparent column, which could be their father because he stopped writing letters to the family. Therefore; it adds meaning by suspense.The corridor where they can see all of the people inside of the cells creates a feeling that each man might be Meg’s father, adding a huge meaning to the story. In the movie, since her father can see, it does not create as much suspense as the book did. The father did not know who Meg was until she got in the column but her father knew as soon as she was walking down the corridor. This does not create as much excitement and joy as the book did when Meg and her father reunited. In the book, it is
I think these differences make the book and the movie way both interesting. I think the differences are good because it sums it all up and with hearing both the book and the movie it fills in the blank questions in your
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
The author shows red in this scene to relate it back to Brown discovering his mother and having to relive that monumental moment in his juvenile years. It brings forth emotions from the audiences of sympathy and an outpouring of tenderness for the character. Without McCullers superior methods of relaying her message through her wording, this piece would be less
It had more narration so the reader could understand what is happening. Secondly, the movie. The movie was different than the book. It had some parts that were in the book, but it lacked some details.
For example, in the book, only one person drowns Pony, but in the movie, three people drowned him. This is different because in the book Pony is being drowned at the water fountain by only one person. On the other hand in the movie Pony is getting drowned by three people instead of one like it is in the story. Another comparison between the book and the movie would be when Ponyboy goes to court and doesn’t testify in the book, but in the movie he does. These are different because in the book when Pony has to go to court for the murder of Bob he doesn’t testify in the movie when he goes to court he does testify.
They walked for weeks and faced many challenges, including hunger and danger. They eventually made it back to their families, but not without much difficulty. The film shows the value of family, the strength of determination, and the devastation caused by policies that seek to erase cultures and identities. Molly is the oldest of the three kidnapped
There are details left out of the movie that were in the book, the movie doesn 't demonstrate the ongoing theme of hunger as well as the book does, and the the movie does a better job with
The book Of Mice and Men written by John Steinbeck and directed by Gary Sinise has very similar themes to the movie. In both George, and Lennie are working towards the American Dream. George tells Lennie stories about a farm with cow, pigs, and chickens. In the movie he said almost the exact same thing: "We're gonna have a cow, and some pigs, and we're gonna have, maybe, maybe, a chicken. " This is their "dream" that they hope their work will eventually pay off in.
In the end I found the film to be easier to understand vs the book as it was an easier and more straight forward plot line whereas in the book it seemed to jump around leading to constant flipping between stories and pages to get a better
It makes the scene interesting because when the two other men walk into view, they drop their pails and run away at the sight of the huge mole bombarding the pipeworks. Another difference between the novel and film is when Lina and Doon are throwing the rock with a letter down the hole to Ember, the novel says it hits Mrs. Murdo on the head, however, in the film it lands in front of Doon’s father who picks it up and unwraps it. This should not change because if Mrs. Murdo and Mr. Harrow had not found the package, they would never have known about the way out of
I enjoyed the movie better than the book. It included just the right amount of action scenes, description words, and details from the story. The story was amazing but I like seeing things more than reading them. I usually like the movies better than the book.
This film amazingly showed Lynch’s creative ideas and twisted imagination. Because Lynch’s daughter came all of a sudden who also had a stern clubbed feet, this resulted to Lynch’s fatherhood fear that greatly showed on the film. In the film, it showed the place where Henry (the main cast) lived to which it represented the place where director Lynch also lived. However, since the movie was released, it did not receive any good reviews from the movie critics. Many movie critics found the film too sickening to be considered it as a good movie.
The plot structure was different in the book and film. The plot in the written text centers around letters to God. In these letters she explains her feelings and her thoughts, it is almost like a diary. She went through her childhood up to her marriage, and then after she left her husband she explained what that was like. This helped to show her happiness since you heard about her feelings.
The theme of love between the two also spoke volumes and had a great message that you can take from the story. Even through times of horror and despair you always keep your loved ones your first, and you also be the light in a world full of darkness. I love how the boy and the father are trying to be the "good guys" when they have no reason to be. It shows the goodness of mankind and the willpower to stand up and not be like the rest of the
Our film, Psyche, is about a teenage girl, Deirdre, who is being physically and emotionally abused by a family friend, a man named Channing. Channing has been sexually assaulting Deirdre as well as causing her to have bruises on her body. Deirdre’s family does not help her in her situation, thus she feels that she has no way of escaping her trauma. This is made worse when she discovers that she is pregnant with Channing’s baby, and this drives her to believe suicide is her only option to be free of her pain. The editing theories that I am going to be using in my editing of the short film Psyche are as follows: From Ken Dancyger’s The Technique Of Film Video Editing: History, Theory and Practice: