Is Adnan Syed an innocent man serving life in prison for a murder he didn’t commit? A lot of people believe so based on the serial podcast told by Sarah Koenig. Adnan was a 17 year old high school student whose parents immigrated from Pakistan when he was too young to remember. He had been dating Hae Min Lee, the victim, and recently broke up with her before her death. The state didn’t have enough evidence to convict him until they got Jay, Adnan’s acquaintance, to testify. Even with Jay’s testimony, I don't believe that Adnan Syed should have been convicted of murder on such little evidence. The state’s motive for Adnan is based on Muslim stereotypes and no real evidence. They say that when Hae broke up with Adnan she besmirched his honor, forcing him to have to kill her to regain it. Adnan has shown many times that he doesn’t follow strict Muslim rules by dating multiple girls, partying, and even smoking marijuana. In the court, the jury was told a story about a Muslim who committed a crime in America and avoided punishment by fleeing to Pakistan through his …show more content…
Throughout the podcast the cell records put Adnan and Jay together, Adnan at the murder scene, and at the site where Hae’s body was buried. Another thing that looks bad for Adnan is the Nisha call. Koenig states that, “Not only does it put Adnan together with his phone in the middle of the afternoon, it puts Adnan together with Jay in the middle of the afternoon,” (Serial Podcast, episode 12). It was always thought that the Nisha call was answered but Koenig discovers that “ AT&T won’t charge for unanswered calls unless the call isn’t terminated within a reasonable time,” (Serial Podcast, Episode 12). This is important because it shows that this call could have been a butt dial and a key piece of the state’s evidence might be wrong. At the end of the podcast, it comes to light that cell records aren't all that
In these two pieces of evidence the court sees the accuracy of calls and the calls being made,with each course of action. According to Waranowitz, “They’re cell phone records with two calls that … went through that particular cell site location, would the functioning of the AT&T network be consistent with the testimony? Waranowitz answered yes ” and according to Wilds,
That is why on the night of the murder, Jay had told Jen exactly what had happened that afternoon. Jay consistently stated throughout his interviews that on that exact night, he had told Jen what Adnan had done. When Jen was brought for questioning, she testified that she had called Jay that afternoon, however, Adnan picked up and quickly told her that Jay will call her back once he was done. This shows that Adnan and Jay, were together that afternoon. Later that day, after 8:00 P.M. or when Adnan had finished burying Hae’s body, she had arranged to pick up Jay in the parking lot of Westview Mall.
He was falsely convicted of the murder of his girlfriend Hae Min Lee. Hae was strangled to death, and found in a park. The only evidence against adnan is a testimony by a man named jay. There is no other actually evidence tying adnan to the case. The case is full of allegations and theories.
There was not enough evidence to prove if Adnan was innocent or guilty. There were multiple people that said that Jay had Adnan’s phone but Adnan called Jay at least twice which means that Adnan would have had to use a payphone or borrow a phone. And supposedly Adnan was sitting in the best buy parking lot when he called Jay. Also in the time it took
Over the past few months there has been another visit into the 2000 murder trial of Adnan Syed, who was convicted of murdering his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee, and is currently serving a life sentence at a Maryland state prison. The case was covered in a twelve part podcast by the name of “Serial”. The podcast which is hosted and produced by Sarah Koenig goes through the evidence behind the conviction of Syed to attempt to come to a verdict of her own. After listening to the Serial Podcast in its entirety and after carefully examining the evidence for the case against Adnan Syed it is in my professional opinion that Jay Wilds was in fact guilty for the murder of Hae Lee. Jay Wilds was the key witness in the case against Adnan and was involved
Here I will tell you how absurd and inane this “speculation” is and why Adnan Syed was condemned wrongfully and injusticely. Personally I think there is a lot of evidence proving Adnan's innocence which leads me to my next claim. Adnan Syed does in fact deserve a new trial. What led me to this
Adnan was put behind bars and has been in jail ever since. So the question; was Adnan’s trial a fair one? No, Adnan Syed is everything but guilty. It would be impossible for him to be able to strangle Hae in 21 minutes after the final release bell of school. Plus, Adnan doesn’t remember much of that certain day, the day of her death wasn’t important enough to him to remember it clearly.
Your girlfriend disappeared and nobody knows where she went. You were just informed she was found dead in a park, but you are being blamed for her death. She was really important to you, and you would never hurt her. Adnan Syed, a 17 year old Muslim of Baltimore, had this happen to him in January of 1999. Adnan Syed was wrongly convicted of Hae Min Lee’s murder because of an inaccurate timeline, an inadequate lawyer, and no DNA evidence against him.
Almost like, Jay himself strangled Hae Min Lee. I think Adnan Syed is innocent because of the following reasons; many people said he was never mad or upset about the breakup, doesn’t have any specific memory of the day Hae went missing and killed because it was a ordinary day for him nothing significant happened for him to remember it. Although he may have smoked weed that day it wouldn’t have affected his memory. Adnan was a good kid, who got along with everyone, played sports, won homecoming king and also had a spotless record.
Although many people may not believe it, Adnan Syed is innocent considering the fact that much of what was said in court is practically hearsay and there is very small amounts of evidence that prove that he took the life of Hae Min Lee. When the case was presented in court, there were many errors that the State chose to omit when Adnan was being tried. For instance, much of the evidence was unfathomed and therefore showed that there was next to no physical evidence that linked him to the crime… “No DNA, no fibers, no hairs, no matching soil from
In Baltimore 1999 on January 13, a girl named Hae Min Lee, a senior at Woodlawn High School, disappeared. Her body was found on February 9 near a park in Baltimore. Her ex- boyfriend Adnan Syed, a 17 year old senior was convicted of killing her and till this day he sits in a cell waiting for his innocence to be proven. Adnan’s star witness Jay, his former classmate who testified that he helped Adnan dispose of Hae’s body. The question everyone's asking is, is Adnan Syed really not guilty
Carson Butler Dayhoff English 3 2-7-17 Serial Paper As indicated by reports and measurements from the National Youth Violence Prevention Resource Center, around one in nine homicides were conferred by a young less than 18 years old in 1999; Hae Min Lee was one of the incalculable casualties of this kind of murder on January 13, 1999. Adnan Syed was indicted this murder by the condition of Maryland in February of 2000. The principle onlooker in his trial was Jay, who the state bases their case off of in light of his credible narrating including the murder.
The defendant is pronounced guilty. Those were the words that Adnan’s Syed’s heard as he was being convicted of first-degree murder of his ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee on Jun. 6 . 2000. The case aroused after the murder of Ms.Lee on Jan. 13 1999. Jay Wilds, a former friend of Mr.Syed had agreed to be interviewed by the authorities for immunity, leading to the state of Maryland building a case against Mr.Syed and leading to his eventual sentencing. After 15 years, journalist Sarah Koenig starts the podcast Serial investigating the murder of Ms.Lee under the notion that there could be a possible mistrial and has now resulted in a retrial.
This was quite the battle for Adnan Syed, a young oriental male who was accused of murdering his long-time girlfriend in January of 1999. Hae-Min Lee, Adnan’s girlfriend, went missing in January and her body was found buried in a local park 3 weeks later. Adnan Syed is innocent of killing Hae-Min Lee because of three reasons: Cristina Gutierrez, Adnan’s lawyer, failed to put him in a position to win the trial, Jay is not an effective witness, and the window of time does not match up. Adnan is not at fault
The Nisha call is important because not only was it a call from someone that only Adnan had known from that day, but it’s also contradicts what Adnan was doing and where he was. Adnan says that he did not have his phone on him until after track practice around 5 PM meaning he would not have been able to make that call or answer it at exactly 3:32 PM, but the call did happen. Also, cell phone tower and records do not lie which means that the call that pinged near Leakin Park was not a false alarm. Lastly, Jay’s Testimony. His testimony puts him and Adnan together making Jay’s story more valid.