Adolf Hitler DBQ

1240 Words5 Pages

Between World War I and World War II, there were various changes in leadership and power structures worldwide. Adolf Hitler, the Nazi leader of Germany, Vladimir Lenin communist leader of Russia; Benito Mussolini, the fascist dictator of Italy; Mohandas Gandhi, a political figure in India; and Emperor Meiji, the emperor of Japan during the Edo period, all of these people changed the power structure for their countries. For instance, Adolf Hitler, the Nazi fascist dictator of Germany and ex-chancellor, rose to power and brought effective measures to repair post-WWI Germany. There were many ways that these leaders demonstrated adequate power and authority: fear tactics, censorship, and the use of peace. Some of these methods of exerting control …show more content…

Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Vladimir Lenin had total control of the population in Germany, Italy, and Russia. In documents B, A, and E, fear tactics are shown because Document B refers directly to Adolf Hitler. He says, “we confess that it is our purpose to prepare the German people again for the role of the hammer,” (Document B). This evidence supports the indisputable proof that Adolf Hitler used fear tactics because he knew that the Treaty of Versailles permitted Adolf to build his army. Still, Adolf claims that it is Germany's purpose to rebuild and prepare for war if one was to occur. So he used fear tactics to try to get other countries to be scared of Adolf and his determination to rebuild and bring power back to Germany. The use of fear tactics is prominent as it is also shown in document A. Specifically when Vladimir Lenin is quoted, “the immediate amalgamation of all banks in the country into a single national bank, and the institution of control over it by the Soviets of Workers’ Deputies,” (Document A). The evidence shows that Vladimir Lenin used …show more content…

In the contents of Document D, it is evident that Mohandas Gandhi was a true utilitarian. We can see this in what he wrote in his letter to Lord Irwin; “I would ... approach you and find a way out. I cannot intentionally hurt anything that lives, much less human beings, even though they may do the greatest wrong to me and mine,” (Document D). This supports the method Mohandas Gandhi used because it undoubtedly shows that with his philosophy of life, he practiced virtuous acts. This means that Gandhi would intentionally take belittlement and beatings from the English soldiers so that he didn't have to harm a single person. This can connect to the 21st century because Thailand started in 2020 and continues today. They peacefully protest a mandate to reform the Thai Monarchy and coup-installed government. This furthers the claim that Gandhi used during his “Salt March” that the best way to prove your point and get your way is without starting a war. It is challenging to make a point without a fight, but it is more impactful if

Open Document