Gun control came into play because guns were becoming a problem in America when in reality it is the people pulling the trigger that are. The laws of gun control are reasonable, but the reason to have more is ridiculous. For example, fewer suicides, police can handle everything, and America becomes a safe place. Even when these reasons are backed up with examples, they still are idiotic. One that got my irritation was for a reason on the internet to be, “gun control will lead to fewer suicides. Suicide is not based on weather you have a gun in your presence or not. There are many ways for people to end their life. It’s weather you want to live on this earth or not. Another reason is that police should be a the only ones that have guns. Not all cops are saints. Some do get arrested for doing horrendous crimes. How do you know that one cop is going to protect you? How do you know he is not crazy enough to shoot you instead of help you? It would be giving the bad cops too much power. …show more content…
Without guns, we would be kicked around by other countries. How did we free ourselves from Britain? Definitely wasn’t from beating them to death with sticks. We would have no chance against any country in a war without guns. The gun control laws that are present right now are helping, but too many of the gun control laws will get out of control. I only pointed out reasons that were absolutely ridiculous. There are some good ones that big guns shouldn’t be carried around by citizens, as well as kids might be able to access it. What sI can only say is people (even stupid) have the right to bear arms. It was the God given right since 1791. Guns are tools. You might not need them all the time, but you have one just in
Gun Control: an Argument Dating Back to Before 1776 The debate of gun control dates back 100s of years,and many people want to ban guns so that no one can have them. That statement is complete ignorance to what really goes on. The debate has many different viewpoints with some being as radical as banning guns to create a false sense of Utopia. The recent rise of school shootings has set off a spark of gun control debates that make little sense.
Back in the day, the available weaponry was not advanced, but rather inefficient particularly when compared to the advancement in weapons that are found currently. The chances that the 18th Century leaders predicted about the advancement of weaponry, like the mass destructive weapons that would come to be called ‘common’ under law in the 21st Century, when they wrote of the right to bear arms are actually very low. The days of using gunpowder and muskets no longer exist; we now have assault weapons and high capacity magazines. Unfortunately, these kind of weaponry go to the wrong hands are put to illegal-use because of the absence of stricter
Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years. Many citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would reduce the threat of crime. People have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of hunting and recreational activity. With the recent events involving firearms and mass shootings, people are skeptical whether to increase or decrease gun laws. Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns and stricter laws and licensing will not effectively save lives.
According to the CDC, “Guns are responsible for over thirty-three thousand deaths in the United States annually. Gun Control is a set of laws that controls the use of guns by civilians. The Gun Control Act was signed as October 22, 1968 but was updated in 1993. As of February 23, 2018 seventy percent of people favor stricter gun laws and twenty-seven oppose of them. I believe that the Gun Control Laws should be stricter here around the United States because almost everyday something bad is happening by the use of a gun.
Despite the common myth that guns protect you and your family from criminals, it actually worsens your chance of being injured or killed. If you own a gun, you are 4.5 times more likely to be shot than someone who doesn 't carry a weapon. You might feel safe having a gun, but if someone does try and hurt you, the chances are higher of your gun getting turned on you. Additionally, If you have a gun at home it 's more likely to be used to threaten a family member or intimate partner than self defense. In addition to this, “out of 61,466 gun incidents, only 2,039 were self defense”(Gun Violence Archive).Which is a small fraction out of total firearm incidents.
‘In the late 1980s, gun control groups realized that they had failed in their original goal—getting handguns banned—and began campaigning against semi-automatic firearms they called "assault weapons," most of which are rifles’(“A ban on assault weapons would not reduce crime”). From 1994 to 2004, the Federal Assault Weapons (F.D.A) banned semi automatic weapons from having more than 10 rounds. The easiest way to define gun control is by saying it a government regulation sale of any type of handgun, or assault rifle. It’s just a certain style the government sales firearms, if you have a criminal background or criminal history you are not allowed to purchase a firearm due to gun control. I personally think gun control doesn’t cause any harm to today’s society, considering the fact that i’m constantly around guns and I have no violent urge to put anyone in danger.
Gun control is what restricts people from buying and using guns, but these laws are not strengthened at the extent they need to be strengthened. This leads to many people getting these guns and using them to cause mass shootings all over the U.S. For example, according to the Council on Foreign Relationship, a news article that covers major world issues, in 2017, mass shootings at a music festival in Las Vegas and at a church near San Antonio have rekindled the gun control debate (“U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparisons”). The fact that gun control is still not tightened is a huge margin and error, and still causes mass shootings as we just covered. Many people have said that we should not allow guns to be purchased, which would seem like the logical option. However, according to the same source, Council on Foreign Relationship, some states, such as Idaho, Alaska, and Kansas, have passed various laws attempting to nullify
Attention Getter: Between 1993 and 2003 gun ownership increased by 56 percent, and yet gun violence declined by almost 50 percent (Bandler). Criminals know that if people have guns to protect themselves then they might not be successful in a shooting. Gun Regulation is immoral because Guns are not what kill people. It is the people who use the guns to kill people, who kill people. Many of these people who cause these mass shooting and killings have mental health issues.
Gun control is hypocritical because the point of gun control is to limit gun violence basically to save human lives but yet there are many other forms of violence that claim more lives each year than firearms. It neglects the reality of control because everyday criminal acts that have been made illegal are still committed. So even if gun control were in effect it would not prevent the use of those weapons, which would mean there is no real control. Also if gun control was allowed it would be targeting a specific group of people; gun owners, which would be discriminating against them. Most importantly as United States citizens under the second amendment we have the right to bear arms, which is why most importantly gun control should not be allowed.
In the United States, almost 53 people are killed using firearms per day. (BBC News) This number is a startling display of the severity of gun violence in America, due in part to the lenient laws around storage of guns, which allow even children to access them easily. The current laws around gun storage have proven to be ineffective, as minors are often able to access guns belonging to their parents or other family members. The prospect of passing new laws that require safer storage of firearms is one worth considering because guns being less accessible would diminish the amount of gun violence in the country, and in turn improve children and teen’s mental health.
In today’s society, one of the most alienating issues in American politics is gun control. More specifically, the issue is whether or not guns should be banned in the United States. Some people would say that guns should be banned because it would reduce crime as a whole and keep citizens safer. These people, enthusiasts of stricter gun laws, fear being safe in their country where there are so many people who have access to guns. Opponents of this argument, however, also fear losing safety.
Gun control also limits our constitutionally derived right to own firearms. If gun control is enforced, law-abiding citizens will be forced to give up their guns and their right to own guns, while many criminals who own guns may illegally keep theirs. As the saying goes “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.” Guns are an important aspect of our society in many ways. They allow for protection, recreation, and hunting.
Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.
Gun laws give too much power to the government and way less from the people, which will lead to government corruption. And, stated by ClearPictureOnline.com,”Guns don 't kill people, people do. We need to concentrate on the values and morals of our citizens and at the role the media plays in glorifying violence and the lack of respect for law.” (Shootout: Do We Need More Gun Control Regulations?) What people don 't understand is that they are taking away their own freedoms with Gun Control.
Firearms are a deterrent to criminals who would attack anyone anytime and anywhere...because of the unknown fact that their victim might be armed with a firearm and use it to save their life and protect their property and loved ones. Firearms are also a check & balance to the potential of government abuses of power. You may feel that to be an unrealistic statement, but ask the Jews who survived the Holocaust if firearms were not first taken away before they were misled into believing that they were being relocated (instead