The article “A National Experiment in Refugee Resettlement” by Geraldo Cadava, published on February 17, 2022, is a persuasive and informative article that presents the importance of refugee resettlement in the United States. This article is from The New Yorker magazine, which publishes daily, and this company provides numerous interesting articles that contain a wide variety of articles like science, education, humor, news, and politics. However, the article could be limited to a certain group since the articles are advanced and technical, which intends to target the well-educated like students, professionals, and artists. The author presents the ideas of the newly developed national resettlement program declared by the state government: …show more content…
He noted that refugee resettlement became crucial after World War II when hundreds of thousands of civilians fled their countries in Europe. Also, thousands of Cuban children were sent to the US after the Cuban Revolution. America was part of resettling these refugees during these times. America has launched numerous refugee programs since World War II like the Displaced Persons Act in 1948, the Indochina Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1975, and the Refugee Act of 1980. These historical significances give the reader confidence in America that America did not overlook the issue and did not just watch people losing their lives due to the displacement of their homes. The author used historical context to provide the severity and legitimacy of this resettlement program and also to accentuate the readers about this …show more content…
First, the author is a professor of history and Latino studies at Northwestern University, which establishes his reliability to present his argument. Also in the article, he introduced many reliable sources about this program. For example, the author presents Secretary of State Anthony Blinken who said, “I’m confident that if you join the Welcome Corps, you won’t just change the lives of the refugees you help, you’ll change your own lives as well.” According to the author, this is a clever way to get Americans' interest and attention about the benefits of supporting the refugees. He also states that the government has faced many political pressures from resettling refugees. President Biden decided to raise the number of refugees entering the US from eighteen thousand, which is a low ceiling imposed by President Trump in 2020. However, this is difficult due to the intransigent Republican caucus. This implied that the government cannot handle the refugee resettlement alone. The citizens are a principal part to achieve the goals of resettling refugees. The author uses his and others’ credibility to support his argument about the importance of refugees and build the readers' trust and
In the small town of Clarkston, there were some people who supported the refugees and there were some who disliked them. Some of the town people were even afraid to talk to the refugees, assuming they were dangerous and bad people. Due to all of these reasons it made very difficult for the people of Clarkston to find a way to get along. The other thing that made difficult to get along was the language barriers. Even the agencies, which were supposed to help the refugees
In the article it runs through the stories of what some Syrian refugees went through before coming to the U.S and how some refugees adapted to American culture, like Akhras
As asylum seekers come to the United States, they are interviewed by asylum officers. The asylum seekers explain stories about the fear they faced in hopes to be declared as a refugee under the 1951
The majority of this article is emotion appeals. The author draws the conclusion that the way the Republican leaders in the United States are responding to this refugee situation is a way of repeating history. The number inferences made between the current situation and the Holocaust pull at the audience’s emotions. The Holocaust is such an powerful part of history with extreme hate and tragedy that at the mere mention of the word “Holocaust” emotions are being affected. The author furthers this tug at emotions by mentioning the story of St. Louis, reminding the us that United States has turned away people in need before and forced them into a death by ignoring their need for help.
In her article “Small town welcomes 1,500 refugees a year” (The Guardian, 24 May 2017) Katy Long describes Clarkstown, Georgia. This small, multicultural town is known for their high percentage of refugee inhabitants. However, this article does not mainly showcase how they manage to rehome such a large amount of immigrants, but instead how they integrate them into the town’s identity.
However, this would not be the first time that Americans have tried to turn their backs on refugees because of their faith. During World War II, Hitler was exterminating the Jewish population of Europe, which led to a steady flow of Jews trying to enter the United States. However, majority of Americans were against accepting Jews and many politicians spoke out against it as
When I was fourteen-years-old, I first saw the photograph of the Afghan Girl on the cover of National Geographic. She was a refugee of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan captured in a single frame of Steve McCurry’s camera. The oceanic coloration of her eyes and the ghost-like expression on her face captivated my attention, just as it had captivated the attention of the Western world in 1985. Her photograph brought me into a world of refugees, from Rwanda, during the genocide, to Sudan, during the genocide, to Iraq, during the 2003 invasion. So, it was her ghostly face and sea green eyes I remembered when the refugee crisis in Europe arose.
“Some scholars have declared that a country’s refugee policy defines it very character” (Madokoro 162). “In recent years Canada has led Western nations in offering safe haven to those who required it” (Troper 1). In today’s world, “Canada has one of the largest refugee
By reading Kevin Lim’s essay on immigration and the pursuit of happiness, it seems that the immigration policies implemented at the time were heavily affected by the unusual relationship between the British and the Americans after the American revolution. Moreover, it appears that despite Alex Hamilton’s background as an immigrant as well as an immigration advocate, Hamilton’s personal setbacks caused him to criticize immigration in the US. Although Hamilton’s intent at the time was to protect the Americans from outside forces, the reason as to why immigration is important applies to both then and now; immigrants benefit the economy and facilitate new relationships between countries. A prime example of this topic is the Syrian crisis. Currently, the US’s contribution to the Syrian refugee crisis is quite measly and stagnant, lagging behind in its admittance of refugees compared to other countries.
Immigration has been a controversial issue for many years, both nationally and globally. Since the conception of the country, people have been migrating, crossing both uncharted and charted boundaries for various reasons. Many individuals migrate willingly in search for greater employment opportunity and educational success. There are many others who migrate in order to escape war-torn countries and seek refuge in any country willing to grant them asylum from the continued violence.
Hozehna Shar Jessi Morton English 112-41 05/02/2018 Yearly, thousands of refugee are admitted into the United States for resettlement. All refugee families are resettled to be saved from their current situations which involve severe forms of persecution, war, and violence in their country. Many refugees who are resettled in the United States are lucky to be able to find better job opportunities, education, freedom of religion, speech, and the press, which are part of their civil rights. With this freedom and protection, refugees find a much better life for their families.
Such evidence includes “Economic Refugee” which are known as “people fleeing their homeland as a result of economic insecurity” (23). By providing this linguistic framing, it allows the authors to develop their reasons for keeping the use of frames in debate. The reasons provided are built upon the definition the frame evokes, rather than being negative, the definitions of the new frames are positive. Ferguson and Lakoff provide the reason for such linguistic framing in that “refugees are worthy of compassion” (23), and such use will allow a more civilized debate. By providing a more humanitarian approach to debate, as the authors suggest, it will allow for more solutions that do not attack the individual.
According to the IRC, there are now more than 82 million refugees and people who have been displaced around the world. The novel Inside Out and Back Again, by Thanha Lai is about a girl named Ha who becomes a refugee because of the Vietnam war. Ha and her family are forced to flee their homes and have to experience many challenges because of this, turning their lives inside out though their lives are slowly turned back again. The article “I Live Inside a Refugee Camp” by Kristin Lewis is about a girl who becomes a refugee and has to live in a refugee camp. During her journey, she becomes aware of the challenges refugees face and how their lives are turned inside out.
The international community is witnessing unprecedented levels of displaced people due to war and political instability. Current estimates from the UN Refugee Agency (2018) argue that ¬¬these numbers could be as high as 65.6 million displaced people. As members of the international community, each nation gets to determine their own response to this crisis. Beliefs and actions taken on this matter have been vastly different and are being demonstrated and crafted by a nation’s national news discourse. Some of the most vastly different actions and opinions on assisting refugees come from the nations of Germany and Hungary.
When it comes to the question about “what is the solution”, opinions start flowing, but to the best of my knowledge, I see that the solution will never be one-sided, in other words, I see no perfect solution from the common options. Blocking the refugees would fail – but to open doors without limit is the most reckless decision. The only solution is treating the root causes in migrants’ countries. “When solving problems, dig at the roots instead of just hacking at the leaves.” ―