The election is over and Donald Trump is now poised to be the 45th President of the United States. In “How Donald Trump Brought Populism to Washington” (2016), Matthew Continetti’s article seeks to analyze the strategies deployed by the Trump campaign that spoke directly to citizens feeling disenfranchised by political authority. The key to a successful presidential campaign came down to message. “Make American Great Again was clear, direct, and appealing to voters who believed the country in which they grew up, and for a time prospered, was transforming into something they did not understand, did not condone, and had no agency within” (Continetti, 2016). Having no public service experience, Trump capitalized on nostalgia of the United States …show more content…
He only introduces liberal based views to describe how incorrectly the Clinton campaign and the media projected the Trump campaign’s effect on the American people. “So convinced were Democrats and liberals that changing demographics guaranteed them victory in presidential elections that they ignored or undermined or provoked the very white working-class voters that made Trump president” (Continetti, 2016). As described in the “Liberalism and Conservatism” presentation, the Clinton campaign championed the liberal views of bigger and better central government, diplomacy, changeable moral principles, toleration and diversity. Instead, Continetti contends that it was a tiring of Obama’s liberal administration and a push for more conservative based views that ignited discussions and swayed voters towards Trump. “Clearly the platform of social liberalism, globalization and appeals to race and ethnicity and sex is not as popular as we had been led to believe” (Continetti, 2016). Throughout the article, Continetti highlights many of the basic conservative principles as described in the presentation. “Trump had many of the qualities of a successful presidential candidate: charisma, a strong message, future-oriented policies, a call for peace through strength and a core base of support” (Continetti, 2016). While controversy and scandal did mare the Trump campaign’s conservative look, Continetti analyzes that it was Trump’s larger than life persona that also helped to diminish his opponent’s liberal
Bill O’Reily in his article “Trumps Silent Plurality” argues that President elect Donald Trump, despite wide opposition by the “Left Wing” media and experts has managed to win the presidential election as well as “rewriting the manual the manual for how to run a presidential campaign. O’Reily supports this claim by introducing the perspective of a trump supporter, giving reasons for why and how Trump was opposed, and finally he explains the importance of the elections results and how they will affect the future. One of the most salient strategies O’Reily employs in order to convey his argument is addressing the situation from a new perspective. From the onset of the article the reader is introduced to the mindset of a fairly informed American voter, who finds presidential candidate Donald Trump very
In the commentary, “A Minority President: Why the Polls Failed And What The Majority Can Do”, George Lakoff (2016) offers a refreshing analysis of the rudimentary divisiveness between America’s progressives and conservatives to explain the American zeitgeist. He presents a framework to explain Donald Trump’s unexpected win at the United States Presidential Elections 2016. By explaining Trump’s tactics, Lakoff attempts to transform his readers into critical listeners, well-versed in political rhetoric to readily oppose acts of Trump which contradict “American values”. This mirrors the fear ancient philosophers had of possible repercussions arising from an unassuming audience facing a masterful speaker (Beasley, 2012). In this essay, I seek to challenge Lakoff’s argument that Trump’s success at the elections is largely contributed to the oratorical tactics pointed out by Lakoff.
The 2016 Presidential election has seen all political norms cast aside. Bernie Sanders, a far left self-proclaimed democratic socialist, and Donald Trump, a real-estate mogul and reality T.V. Star, have changed how elections will be conducted for the foreseeable future. Both candidates appeal to voters who are distraught with the Washington insiders’ inability to accomplish their goals. Trump, by the self-funding of his campaign, and Sanders, by his consistent denouncing of super PAC's, have fought to change corrupt election financing. "Feeling the Bern" has become the new trend among millennials who are enthusiastic about Sanders economic policies.
In 2016, the presidential election was brutal: the two candidates, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton spoke negatively about each other every chance they got and it still remains undetermined whether or not one or both candidates bribed and cheated their way to the top of their party. Additionally, the battle to decide the Democratic party’s nominee was tight, as Bernie Sanders was extremely popular with the young, liberal voters. In a way, 2016’s election bears many similarities to the Election of 1800. They both began with three potential winners: a popular upstart who was attempting to make his presidential debut, an occasionally-unconstitutional lawyer who had had already had an influential voice in the executive branch, and a racist, loud-mouthed,
The American present witnesses the steady aggrandizement of” powers, while “the story of the American past, on the other hand, continues to be told in narratives that…highlight[s] a story of relative powerlessness.” This conflicting representation of American past versus present supports Novak’s claim that one cannot associate what began as a weak state to how it is formed today, indicating a falsehood to Tea Party members
They did so by employing the ideas of democracy, freedom and liberty. Both the democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton and the republican candidate, Donald Trump spoke on national security and both of their speeches include evidence of these ideas. Trump spoke of how the future of the democracy must include an increase in military and a more preventative approach regarding cyber attacks. The fear tactic of a possible attack urges voters to think about their freedom, and what it would mean if it was lost. Similar to the The Declaration of Independence and The Crisis, Trump addressed the “common man” as identified by Maddy Todaro in her socratic discussion.
On April 19, 1995, Timothy McVeigh detonated a bomb, killing 168 American citizens, in Oklahoma. It was the cruelest terrorist act ever conducted on American soil, and it stunned the nation. President Bill Clinton presents a speech following the terrorist attack to reassure his audience-- the frightened and affected American citizens-- they are not alone when it comes to the pain they feel and American will always be there to lean on through the use of the rhetorical devices: asyndeton, parallelism, and anaphora. In President Bill Clinton’s introduction of his speech, he conveys himself to be relatable emotionally to the alarmed Americans through the rhetorical device asyndeton to build a sense of trust.
he Rise and Fall of the Populist Party in Texas Shorty after the turn of the century, the once rural and agricultural America that had existed before the Civil War and shortly after, was dying. In it’s place a more urban, industrial society was born, dominated by bankers, and industrialists. While this proved beneficial for much of the country, Texas, being rural and agricultural, was especially hard hit. As problems mounted, and elected officials proved either unable or unwilling to address them, a third political party emerged.
The Populist development was a rebellion by ranchers in the South and Midwest against the Democratic and Republican Parties for overlooking their hobbies and troubles. For over 10 years, ranchers have experienced harvest disappointments, falling costs, poor promoting, and absence of credit offices. Numerous ranchers were in the red because of a dry spell that influenced the Midwest in the 1880s. In the meantime, costs for Southern cotton dropped. These calamities, joined with disdain against railways, cash loan specialists, grain-lift proprietors, and others with whom agriculturists worked together, drove ranchers to arrange a few different organizations.
Throughout history it was obvious that the key to a good presidential campaign was a good slogan. Each election year something new and unseen came up about the candidates that made them increasingly entertaining, and occasionally impactful. From mud slinging to parades, from taunting to ignoring, each political candidate had an interesting year that is left down in history for all to wonder about what they were thinking. Tippecanoe and Tyler Too (William Henry Harrison 1840) This crazy slogan is actually incredibly influential.
In The Political Culture of the United States, Donald Devine (1972, 183) echoes William Mitchell’s argument that “the basic ideas of the American political ‘mind’ received their most explicit statement in the Declaration of Independence.”
Fallacies in political speeches: Donald Trump announces he is running for president. Donald Trump’s one very distinct “ability” is making a vast amount of people react to what he says. Be it good or bad, this makes him gain more attention not only in the United States, but all over the world. At the end of the day, what really matters is if his statements have, in fact, any effect on people’s votes. So for those who are not yet sure about his sincerity, it only takes a not to deep analysis of his speeches to spot serious fallacies.
The theory I did was alienation which was introduced by Marxist. The way I describe alienation is living in society where your skin, eye color, hair texture, or accent is not fully accepted. The article I did was The 'Trump Effect ' Alienating Conservative Latinos which was posted August 31, 2015. The article is about Donald Trump, latinos, immigration, and republican candidates. It seems like Trump has a significant problem with the latino community in the United States.
A Trump Victory There's another concern for a Trump presidency besides the likelihood of war, the appointment of ultra-conservative judges, the deepening of racial divides, mass deportation, the cooling of climate change initiatives and the loosening of regulations that restrain corporations from plundering and poisoning us. That concern is that a Trump victory defeats the ideal of the virtuous leader, the idea that success and greatness is built on the traditional values we've all been told to aspire to, the values that allow us to walk closer to divinity, the values that make us better persons and the world a better place. A Trump victory—and you can argue that he's already been victorious—spits in the face of those values. Here are the ones he routinely ignores: humility
In my paper, I will analyse Donald Trump’s political activities before and after the election to get an objective viewpoint of America’s President. We’ll start off with the history of Trump, both personal and political, to see whether there was some sort of significant development over the years indicating a tendency towards ‘good or evil’. Next, we will take a look at what Donald Trump promised to do – the wall, lowering taxes and repealing Obamacare to name a few – and evaluate if he managed to keep his election pledges. This success rate is a major factor in definitively assessing Trump’s influence on America.