Analysis Of The Kelly Cashman Vs. California Court Case
The present report has been prepared by myself Guadalupe Centeno on the basis of my observations carried out on March 27, 2018, at the Larson Justice Center during the Kelly Cashman VS California court case. This court case trial is being executed since the party Kelly Cashman is being charged with a DUI. The prosecutor is the attorney named Sara Beller, the defense attorney’s name is Mr. Miller, and the judge was named Otis Sterling. During this court case, two witnesses named Christine Rosas and Holy Sanchez. Christine Rosas presented her testimony and three pieces of evidence, while Holy Sanchez also presented her testimony and one piece of evidence. During this court case, the jury was also very engaged and had numerous question for both …show more content…
The overview of the case given stated that the party Kelly Kashman had crashed into a curb and when the police arrived at the scene they determined that had urinary incontinence she was driving under the influence of alcohol and other prescribed medications. Furthermore, the defense attorney claimed that Kelly Cashman went into a restaurant she habitually attends and in where she is close with the bartender. On that occasion, she attended the restaurant for a memorial service, while she was there, she asked the bartender for a Coca-Cola and when she received the cup and took a sip from it she looked at the bartender in astonishment since she realized that the drink had rum and Coca-Cola mixed. The defense attorney claims that Kelly Cashman told the bartender to give her a regular Coca-Cola after she realized it had rum, he also claims that the bartender replied by trying to persuade her to finish the drink, the bartender told Kelly Cashman “it’s medication, you will feel better”. Moreover, Kelly Cashman decided to finish the drink since she thought it would be okay since it was just one cup. However, Kelly Cashman was also taking medication for a jaw infection that she was diagnosed with. The defense attorney’s biggest claim throughout the trial was that Kelly Cashman committed “an innocent mistake”. The first witness is named Christine Rosas and she is the dental assistance of Dr. Kelsey, has been prescribing the medications that Kelly Cashman has been taking. In her testimony, she explained the day that Kelly Cashman walked into the dental office and the process that has been occurring since. She also presented 3 pieces of evidence that include the x-rays of the patient, the diagnosis record, and the medication record. The second witness is named Holy Sanchez and she is one of the nurses in charge of treating
Supreme Court Case: Riley Vs. California
1346 Words | 6 PagesRiley v. California in 2014 was a case in which the United States Supreme Court argued whether the police has the right to search and seize digital content without a warrant, from individuals who have been arrested. So, the main question of the case was whether the evidence admitted at trial from Riley’s cell phone violated his Fourth Amendment right. The court ruled, by a unanimous vote that a warrantless cell phone search during an arrest is unconstitutional. On August 22, 2009, the police stopped David Leon Riley for driving with an expired registration tag.
Summary Of Morgan V Sate
782 Words | 4 PagesCitation: Morgan v Sate, 537 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1989) Facts: James A. Morgan, the appellant, who at sixteen was diagnosed as organically brain-damaged and brain-impaired, murdered the elderly woman with whom he was employed to perform manual labor. Morgan is described as a teenage alcoholic, who since the age of four sniffed gasoline on a regular basis.
State Vs Loza Case Study
1303 Words | 6 PagesThe trial court denied litigant's consequent movement to bar his retrial on twofold danger grounds. After the court denied litigant's pre-trial movement to stifle all announcements and confirmation seized in this matter, a trial by jury initiated on October 21, 1991. Preceding presenting the case to The jury additionally discovered appealing party liable of every single residual particular aside from the R.C. 2929.04(A) (3) particular regarding the irritated killings of Senteno and Jerri
Reed Vs California Court Case Analysis
246 Words | 1 PagesName of case: Reed v. King Court: California Court of Appeals Citation: 193 Cal. RPTR. 130 (1983) Parties & their roles: Dorris Reed (Plaintiff/petitioner); Robert King (Respondent/defendant) Facts: Dorris Reed purchased a home from Robert King; Mrs. Reed paid $76,000 for this property. Mrs. Reed found out from her neighbors once she had moved in, that Mr. King failed to disclose that ten years earlier a mother and her four children had been murdered in the home. She also learned the house carried a stigma due to its history, which causes appraisers to evaluate the true worth of the home to be $65,000.
Communication Strategies Of The Virginio Gomez-Santillan Rape Trial
2815 Words | 12 PagesThe victim “Jane Doe” claimed that on July 22, 2021, her next door neighbor, Mr. Santillan sexually assaulted her while she was unconscious. The attorneys, judges, audience, and jurors all possessed unique communication patterns. These ultimately impact the decision of whether Mr. Santillan is guilty and showcases the standards of a trial. As a communication student from the University of California, Santa Barbara I was able to decipher these communication
Supreme Court Cases: The Mapp V. Ohio Case
621 Words | 3 PagesMapp v. Ohio Throughout the last 70 years, there have been many cases that the U.S. Supreme Court has decided upon leading to many advancements in the U.S. Constitution. Many of the cases have created laws that we still use today. In the case I chose, Dollree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials, four little pamphlets, a couple of photos, and a little pencil doodle, after an illegal police search of her home for a suspected bomber. No suspect was found, but she was arrested.
The Case Of People V. Mr2d 504
440 Words | 2 PagesIt was Ricky Franklin Smith fourth offense, in which he was known as a habitual offender. He pleaded guilty to a charge of breaking and entering. During his hearing in the Court of Appeals, Smith suggested that he deserve a resentence due to the fact his charges was base upon his expunged juvenile criminal record. The Court of Appeals referred back to the case in People v. Price, 172 Mich App 396, 399-400; 431 NW2d 524 (1988) that suggested that in pursuant to MCR 5.913 when a juvenile record is expunged it cannot be used in a sentencing. Whereas, People v. Jones 173 Mich App 341, 343;433 NW2d 829 (1988) states that an expunged juvenile record can be included in an investigation report and in a sentencing(People v. Smith, 2017).
The Supreme Court Case Of Buck V. Bell
845 Words | 4 PagesAdam Cohen presents a very interesting topic to not only fellow historian, but to as well the average citizen. In his book he talks about the Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell. Cohen is trying to inform the reader just how cruel and inhumane the United Sates was at one point. The Supreme Court case of Buck v. Bell was an argument of wither or not the United stated should practice sterilization of young women. He does a great job going through details as to why the United States did this.
Riley Vs California Case Study
1243 Words | 5 PagesRiley v. California 573 U.S. ____ (2014) By: Jonathan Feltis December 16, 2015 Dr. Bobby Lomeli, AJ12 In 2014, the United States Supreme Court reviewed the case of Riley v. California and a very similar case United States v. Wurie, and decided on June 25, 2014, whether or not the data of a cell phone (smart phone) can be searched incident to arrest without a warrant. Before Riley v. California was decided, information about searching the data of cell phones was vague. There were differing rulings by state and federal courts whether or not police can search a cell phones digital contents without a warrant.
If Mr. Jones And Cut-Rate Liquor, Was Intoxicated?
1006 Words | 5 PagesAn Opening Your Honor, the opposing counsel, members of the jury, this case is about the unreliability of evidence and an insufficiency to meet the burden of proof that is required to convict Mr. Jones and Cut-Rate Liquor with a violation of Nita Liquor Commission Regulation 3.102. This case is to be decided on four issues: 1) Knowledge. Whether the Defendant, Mr. Jones and Cut-Rate Liquor, knew or ought to have known that the customer, Mr. Watkins, was intoxicated? 2) Sale.
Case Of Fitzgerald V. Lawrence
1157 Words | 5 PagesOn balance, the probative value of evidence of Ms. Fitzgerald’s drug use is extremely high and substantially outweighs any risk of either unfair prejudice or undue delay. IV. MS. FITZGERALD’S PRIOR DURG US IS EXEMPT FROM THE PROHIBITON ON HEARSAY UNDER RULE
Argumentative Essay: The Murder Of Mr. Stephens
548 Words | 3 PagesLadies and gentlemen of the jury, you are here because one person in this courtroom decided to take law into her own hands. The defendant, Mrs. Dominique Stephens, murdered the man that she vowed to love. This sole act by the defendant is violation of all morals and her husband’s right to live. Afterwards, she even felt guilty about this violation of justice and called the cops on herself, and she later signed a written statement stating that she is guilty of the murder of Mr. Donovan Stephens. Then the defendant later recanted this statement and said that she only killed Mr. Stephens in self defense.
Restraining Observation
327 Words | 2 PagesOn 11/15/15 at approximately 1257 hours, I, Offcier Artaz responded to 727 Labor Street in reference to a disturbance. This location is in the City of Delta, County of Delta and the State of Colorado. I arrived on scene , and contacted Deborah Dugas (DOB 08/16/71). Deborah told me that her and her son, Spencer Bachman (DOB 11/20/88), had gotten into a verbal agument. Deborah advised that Spencer has a restraining order, that prohibits him from drinking alcohol.
Child Observation Worksheet
1514 Words | 7 PagesDATE AND TIME: Wednesday, October 19, 2016, approximately at 12:38 p.m. VENUE: Calkins Rd. west of Nichols Rd. / Clayton Township/Genesee County/ State of Michigan INFORMATION:
Court Observation
820 Words | 4 PagesBut I was able to talk to the Judge who helped to bring a lot of understanding to the process we were viewing. The judge stated that the type of casing we were viewing, was a Jury-less court system which meant that
More about Analysis Of The Kelly Cashman Vs. California Court Case
Supreme Court Case: Riley Vs. California
1346 Words | 6 PagesSummary Of Morgan V Sate
782 Words | 4 PagesState Vs Loza Case Study
1303 Words | 6 PagesReed Vs California Court Case Analysis
246 Words | 1 PagesCommunication Strategies Of The Virginio Gomez-Santillan Rape Trial
2815 Words | 12 PagesSupreme Court Cases: The Mapp V. Ohio Case
621 Words | 3 PagesThe Case Of People V. Mr2d 504
440 Words | 2 PagesThe Supreme Court Case Of Buck V. Bell
845 Words | 4 PagesRiley Vs California Case Study
1243 Words | 5 PagesIf Mr. Jones And Cut-Rate Liquor, Was Intoxicated?
1006 Words | 5 PagesCase Of Fitzgerald V. Lawrence
1157 Words | 5 PagesArgumentative Essay: The Murder Of Mr. Stephens
548 Words | 3 PagesRestraining Observation
327 Words | 2 PagesChild Observation Worksheet
1514 Words | 7 PagesCourt Observation
820 Words | 4 Pages