Primary Source Essay Chapter 5 Reading 3
Roman Women Demonstrate against the Oppian Law (195 B.C.E)
The source, Roman Women Demonstrate Against the Oppian Law, written by Livy, a Roman historian, offers a great deal of information into the history of the Roman culture. This document is a reorganized explanation of a debate that occurred in 195 B.C.E between Marcus Porcius Cato and Lucius Valerius over the repeal of the Oppian Law, which was written in Rome sometime between 59 BCE and 17 CE (130-206 years after the debate occurred). At this time in the Roman society, like much of the world, women were valued in the traditional roles of wives and mothers. However, they moved beyond the boundaries of their roles to fight the Oppian law, which
…show more content…
More specifically, this source is intended for the supporters of the Oppian law and male dominance, not so much the supporters of women equality. The genres of this written document are law and history. Through the debate between Marcus Porcius Cato and Lucius Valerius, Livy explains the Oppian law and the different views of women’s’ roles in Roman society at that time in history. Although Livy is somewhat bias towards men, his style choice provides insight to both sides of the debate instead of just his view, which increases the reliability of the source. The style of the source also increases the appreciation for the content because the people that agree with the law and the people that oppose the law can relate to the source. Although Lucius Valerius’s argument does not appeal to the specific audience that Livy is trying to reach, both sides of the debate are described in the source. However, it is possible that Livy left out some information to support Marcus Porcius Cato and his own view of male supremacy. The reliability of the source is negatively affected by the identity of the intended audience because Livy is specifically trying to reach those who agree with his view and support the Oppian …show more content…
Through the debate, we learn about the history of Rome culture, the Roman society, the view of women in the Roman society, and the roles they had. In 195 B.C.E., Rome was facing economic oppression from the war. Because of the monetary hardship, the Oppian law was passed in hopes to decrease conflict between the rich and the poor. At this time in Roman society, gender role distinctions and class distinctions existed, and gender roles greatly affected laws and the government. Women were considered weak and viewed as prizes of men that determined their status and place in society. Because women were under men’s control, they were seen as a treat to society when they stepped out of their boundaries and demonstrated publicly against the Oppian law. Not all of the information about this event is present in this source, but overall, the content of this source is reliable information.
This is different from the Roman structure in that the emperor had complete power, and the senate held power over everyone else because of their financial status. Although the citizens of Rome could elect their officials and consuls, not everyone was considered a citizen unlike the tribespeople of Rhineland. In particular, women had an immensely higher status and role in Germanic society, starting with the fact that they were considered “citizens”. In the eyes of the men, their mothers and wives were the “most sacred witnesses of his bravery”, and were the healers and caregivers of them all6.
Sextus Tarquinius is he that last night returned hostility for hospitality, and brought ruin on me, and on himself no less, if you are men, when he worked his pleasure with me"' (Tivy, "The Rape of Lucretia, p. 302). Lucretia was a victim but decided death would find itself a better opportunity than life because she felt that she had not dishonored only herself but her family. These lines directly demonstrate how much of Roman women's value had become placed on whether a woman kept her honor by remaining chaste and modest, even in cases of sexual
While men have always featured prominently throughout history, women tend to be more of an afterthought, and especially in fiction, women tend to fall into strict archetypes that allow very little deviation. This holds true in Apuleius’ novel The Golden Ass, but many of the female characters also exhibit great agency and power that women in other Roman stories tended not to have. There is a wide range of female archetypes in this book but they are also deep and complex characters that should not be pigeon-holed into one category. One of the first complex female characters that Lucius, the main character, meets in The Golden Ass is the servant girl Photis. While Lucius is staying with his friend Milo, Lucius’ aunt Byrrhena warns him of Milo’s wife, Pamphile, who practices witchcraft, she tells him instead to turn his attention to Photis, saying on page 22, “So even though it has its hazards, Photis must be your target (Apuleius).”
Justinian furthered his mission and began building safe houses for women who were trying to get out of being a prostitute which helped reflect his pure faith as emperor. This essay investigates how Justinian used Theodora to perfect his society and assesses how successful his legislature, safe houses, and punishments were in regards to molding his own utopia. Although, some people say that Theodora was the one who took advantage of her relationship with Justinian, the laws that she got passed only put more control over women and their bodies. Justinian changed these laws that seemed to be made for Theodora and the improvement of women's status but were instead for changing the parts of society that he didn't like as
The roles and social status of women in ancient times are being described by many well-known playwrights and poets. Yet, different works shows different opinions towards “women power”. In this essay, I am going to compare Homer’s Iliad and The Code of Hammurabi along with Sophocles’ Antigone.
The Roman Empire regarded males higher than they valued female children, with a daughter’s chances of being reared being less than her brother’s . If a father decided his new-born daughter was not to be reared, there was no law to prevent him from offering it to the Gods by exposing the child on a mountain, leaving the child to die, in hope that it would be rescued by a wealthy family or raised in service2. The sex ratio found from the tombstones in both Alexandria and Pompeii indicated that there were more adult males in the population1, which indicates that selected infanticide occurred, with more males reared than females. However, this under-commemoration of females could be indicative of the Roman valuation of males over females, since in general, a population should have an equal number of males and females.
” Once the government’s disrespect for these people was shown, they lost a lot of respect for themselves, contributing to people’s anger and makes them distraught. Rome was a little different, though. They would accept almost anyone as a citizen (except for slaves or freed slaves.) Rome would allow children of freed slaves, and even women, and though they could not hold public office or vote, they could own their own property. This proves that they had some level of respect for women at least, very much unlike many other ancient civilizations including the Athenian.
In Ancient Greek Civilization, women were viewed as submissive. A man always controlled the women; that either being the Father or Husband. Women were forced to stay in the house and complete all household duties. Women were not even granted the right to attend assemblies, participate in politics, or even represent themselves in court. Having little to no overall power in your society can have a huge burden on Women but this can also fuel certain Women to strive to change the society they live in.
She uses Roman literature, to find more information about the ruling classes. The chapter goes through the jobs women held and how they varied by social status. The final chapter of the book reviews the effects of Religion on Roman women. It relates the topic to modern day Italian customs today.
Thus, female sexual power was praised when working in the favor of a man, but resulted in a loss of social standing if it worked against a man’s or a family’s agenda, political or otherwise. This paper will examine how female sexual morality worked in this system of constantly changing allegiances and under which circumstances traditional morality was used or ignored. Moreover, the altered moral systems set in place ultimately lead to a glass-ceiling for female power in Ancient Rome even if some women could obtain power through using her sexuality or lack of sexuality. In Ancient Rome, elite women had much more freedom than those in many other cultures in the ancient world.
Different societies view women in different lights. Therefore, a woman’s position is greatly different from one society to the other. The societies in question do not necessarily have to exist at the same time. Even in the same time frame, two societies could exist, where one treat women as equals to men, and another that treats women differently than men, whether better or worse. The societies in question are: Mesopotamia, Greece, China, Rome & Europe, and this essay aims to study different societies’ viewpoints on women, and to compare and contrast them against each other.
To accomplish this analyzation I have structured this paper into an intro paragraph, four body paragraphs, and a conclusion paragraph. The first body paragraph explains how Penelope’s forced marriage with Odysseus supports the patriarchy. The second paragraph analyzes Penelope’s character, and how the story diminishes her character to make men seem more powerful. The third paragraph dives into the relationship with the suitors and Penelope. I analyze how Penelope uses her situation to her advantage, and how that undermines the patriarchy.
In the Greece civilization, ladies were not given a position, they were thought to be not as much as slaves. Rome’s general public was separated into
Over generations, the role of women in society has shifted and changed immensely, improving upon many aspects of rights and values that women have. The changes occurred gave women opportunities to provide ideas, to have the same rights as men, giving women freedom, leading to many contributions of many significant and valuable events. But from current roles of women being equal to those of men, how women stood in ancient society significantly differs and contrast with ours today. Throughout history, the role and significance of women were always outweighed by the dominance and influence of men. The role of women in ancient times varied throughout, depending on the place and area in the world, in which women had different roles and impacts on their own society.
In the Ancient world, much like today, each society exercised, according to their custom, different treatment towards women. Today, unlike in the Ancient world, women enjoy more freedom, rights, and equality. In this essay, the status of women in ancient Egypt will be compared to the status of women in ancient Rome. Academic sources will be relied on to provide the necessary actualities when one investigates ancient lives and cultures. The legal status of women in society, the different roles that each unique nation’s women played, and the possible education permitted and occupations available to these women will be discussed, as well as, their domestic atmospheres will be critically compared in this short essay to demonstrate the different treatment (if there were a difference) of women in both these imposing periods of ancient history.