The time period of 1828 to 1836 was an eight year time span in which Andrew Jackson, a Democrat, serve two terms as president of the United States in which he sought to be a champion of the common man. To fully understand this time period, one must look at the the context. Before this period, the Democratic-Republicans most recently controlled the presidency under John Quincy Adam, who won the 1824 election against Jackson due to the Corrupt Bargain. This led to anger and resentment towards Adams and drastically destroyed his political party's image. In addition, beginning in the West as new states were being added their constitutions allowed for all white males to participate in voting. As a result of this, the East also began to follow suit, …show more content…
This can be seen in the 1832 Supreme Court majority opinion on the Worcester v. Georgia case favored the Indian’s side displaying them as their own country and were not subject to the rule of the United States. Jackson would go on to ignore Supreme Court's ruling in Worcester v. Georgia and continue to remove Indians, pushing them towards the West. This was a direct violation of the Constitution, but through it Jackson opened lands for the common man aiding them (Document E). In context, Andrew Jackson approved the creation of the Indian Removal Act in 1830, which enabled for money to be spent on expediting federal negotiations with Indians to remove them. Additionally, the Black Hawk War which lasted from 1831 to 1832 displayed to American’s the hostility go the Indians and the need for their removal. This caused Andrew Jackson to violate the constitution as he sought to remove the Indians in order to protect and aid the common man. A growing amount of the population, especially the elites, were critical of Jackson’s actions with one political cartoonist displaying Andrew Jackson as a king who violated the Constitution depicted with him standing over it. Through this, the cartoonists sought to display the anti-Jacksonian belief that Jackson abused the executive power for his own good and overused his right to veto. When in reality Jackson violated the constitution in order to aid the common man, especially seen in the removal of the Indians which he did even after the Supreme Court made it unconstitutional (Document F). In context, Jackson had violated the Constitution multiple times to aid the common man especially seen in how he ignored Supreme Court orders by removing Indians. Additionally, Jackson continually vetoed a majority of congressional measures as seen in the Maysville Road measure which he vetoed. Through violating the
When the U.S started to rapidly expand westward, there were major conflicts between white settlers and the Native Americans who occupied those regions. The need to push Native Americans out of their ancestral lands led to President Andrew Jackson’s speech concerning the Indian Removal Act on December 6, 1830. The Indian Removal Act was put in place by the United States government to move the Native Americans west of the Mississippi River into what was described to be “Indian Territory” (Bentley, 2011, p. 679). In his speech, President Andrew Jackson stated that the Indian Removal Act would “ Place a dense and civilized population in large tracts of country now occupied by a few savage hunters.” It was very evident that the Native Americans were in fact portrayed as savages and unequal to the American people.
President Jackson supported the Indian removal with most of the rest of the nation, which he represented, giving him the opportunity to represent the “average” American citizen in the 1800s. Jackson called for the removal of Indians because he, along with the majority of the nation, wanted the United States population to be all white. “One more step toward making the United States a white man’s country.” He wanted more land for the population of the United States to take over, which happened to be the
Andrew Jackson once said, “There are no necessary evils in government. Its evils exist only in its abuses.” In perspective, Jackson’s work can also be applied to his own quote in which he tries to talk about the rich men who use their power for personal gain or social status. The Indians who were endlessly persecuted hated his unmerciful hand that was responsible for the killing of thousands. Andrew Jackson forced the Native Americans to an early death by pushing them to the Indian territory of present day Oklahoma.
According to Document B, it said “Shall the people rule….The people shall rule” The document tells that he should let the people rule and everyone has the rights. In this document, it shows Andrew Jackson gives the right to
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 is unjust because it violates the Cherokees’ right to their lands and nation, can only bring them harm, and the grounds upon which the law was formed and justified are invalid. Andrew Jackson argues that the Indian
This misuse of power is the reason why cartoons like "King Andrew The First," were created. By showing him as a likeness to a playing card king, this cartoon exemplifies Jacksons occasional disregard for the constitution and his tyrannical abuse of power. It is arguable that Jackson did have some good points. Jackson's response to the nullification proclamation was a just and constitutionally sound one.
During the years of 1832, 1836, and 1840 the United States had two democrats in office and one Whig. In this paper I’m going to discuss the presidential election of 1828, 1836, and 1840 and the issues that were encountered during those elections. Andrew Jackson the 7th president of the United States was a democrat that had won against previous National Republican John Quincy Adams. Jackson was well known for his military success. He was also known for building the foundation for the Democratic Party.
Some people might say that President Jackson only did good things during his time as the leader of this great nation. This is incorrect because he turned his back on the southerners and treated the native americans badly. In the picture in the DBQ packet. In this picture it shows that he is standing on top of the Constitution. This shows that he thinks that he is a king because he thinks he is above the law of the country.
Andrew Jackson’s policy of Indian Removal was not justified because the Indians had rights to own the lands and the U.S. did not follow their democratic ways towards the natives. One example from the text is, “the state of Georgia, in her attempt to extend her laws over us…in direction opposition to the treaties” (The Cherokees Appeal to Congress). Based on this information, I realized the U.S. government was disobeying the “supreme law of the land” or treaties, as of John Marshall (Chief Justice of Supreme Court) had stated and was no different on how Britain had unfairly treated the Americans before. Also, the text supports this idea by stating “This is the land of our nativity, and the land of our...birth. We cannot consent to abandon
In the article “Abuse of Power: Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act of 1830,” the author, Alfred A. Cave, writes about President Jackson’s abuse of power. He is arguing that Jackson abused his power when he was enforcing the Indian Removal Act. He argues that Jackson broke guarantees he made to the Indians. He uses a political methodology and uses secondary sources.
The People’s President The 7th President of the United States, Andrew Jackson opened many doors to having a pristine nation. As the peoples president, he had many premeditated concepts that he was meticulous to complete. When the name Andrew Jackson comes up most people think of all the citizen that were killed while he was in office. But, just think about what the United States be like without all of the failures and achievements that Jackson endured in his lifetime.
According to document F it states “It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes.” This quote from Andrew Jackson is talking about how Jackson doesn’t want the rich and powerful to rule the government when he says “regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes.” This means that the rich and power are changing the government while the poor are not getting treated the same way. He wants to implement this change because he wants everyone to be able to have a voice in the government. The last reason is he is trying to stop the government from misusing the power so at least the people can make change and make the government better with the changes by the people.
This policy would demonstrate Jackson’s notion that the common white man should be allowed to participate more in democracy. This policy would go against the ideas of our Founding Fathers who had supported a very compound electoral system that would disable the common man from securing excessive amounts of power. By expanding the voting rights for white men he
Andrew Jackson was seen as a common man the voice of the people by some. By others he was King Andrew, trampling the constitution and instigating tyranny. Jackson’s presidency impacted democracy, through his use of the veto power, and his claim of Clay creating a “corrupt bargain”, which is not a turning point for a rise in democracy despite him giving white male suffrage. During Jackson’s use of executive power weakened voice of the people.
Jackson and his followers called the election of 1824 the “stolen election” due to the fact that Jackson had the popular vote. Andrew Jackson’s campaign then began calling the candidate the common people’s man who would look out for the voice of democracy (Case). A smart tactic due to the fact that the election of 1824 looked, to the public’s eye, a change of power behind closed doors which jeopardized American democracy. A tactic that proved useful as Jackson beat both Adams and Clay respectively in 1828 and 1832. During Jackson’s time in office he proved both himself as both a negotiator and a bold man.