Was Andrew Jackson, one of America's most beloved presidents, a democratic leader? Andrew Jackson the first president to get the will of the people involved with the American government, making him a democratic leader. As a democratic leader, he listened to the wishes and wants of the people when making important government decisions. Him doing so, made the vast majority of the American people support him. During his first run for election in 1824, he lost to John Quincy Adams because of a so called “corrupt bargain.” After John Quincy Adams was done with his presidency, Jackson won back to back presidencies in 1828 and 1832. Even after the death of Andrew Jackson, people still wrote him in for president, which shows the lasting impression he left on the nation. In the writing, “The American Pageant,” it stated that the election of Andrew Jackson was a revolution achieved by ballots instead of bullets. Also, it stated that Jackson’s victory sped up the transfer of power from the country house to the farm house, from the east to the west, from the snobs to the mobs. Lastly, this writing states that if Jefferson was a hero of the gentleman farmer, Jackson was a hero of the dirt farmer. This shows that Jackson’s presidency was a revolution in the common people's minds because they …show more content…
Also, it states that Jackson gave the idea of a law that would limit the term on which government officials could serve to 4 years. Lastly, it stated that no man has any more right to a government job than others. This document supports that Jackson was democratic because he suggested a law that would give the common people a chance at working for the government. Before Jackson, only high class people could work at government jobs. Now, the common people would have a shot at a job that they would never have been able to work at
“The Birth of Modern Politics” is about the 1828 presidential election, which pitted Andrew Jackson vs. against John Quincy Adams. Parson’s book also discusses the events in Andrew Jackson’s and John Quincy Adams’ lives leading up to it as well. The book opens by giving background information about Andrew Jackson and his achievements. Specifically, his success in conquering the Native Americans at the battle of New Orleans and his humble origins made Jackson America’s first “man of the people” candidate for the 1824 election. However, during the 1824 election, Jackson had lost to Adams to which his followers claimed he was denied and should have won.
Andrew Jackson was not democratic. Jackson was stubborn and was not open to other decisions but his own. For example, Jackson made the decision to help out a former supporter and appoint Samuel Swartwout as a collector in office, even though he had a past history of “criminal tendencies”. Because of Andrew’s poor decision, Samuel stole over $1,000,000; this was a very monumental theft. The robbery could have been avoided if Jackson listened to the people around him saying “no”.
Andrew Jackson’s presidency was a turning point of sorts for the United States. For the first time ever there was a president “of the common man”, as he was referred to. Prior to him getting into office, the United States a fledgling nation, had yet to see anyone other than high-ranking, old money aristocrats in office. It can be hard to feel fully represented and provided for when your government is unfamiliar with your problems and needs. These was not an issue that was unfamiliar, in fact the problem of illegitimate representation was what the colonists had sought to escape when under Britain’s rule.
This cartoon emphasizes Jackson’s populist appeal and his commitment to democracy; in a way, he is depicted as a defender of the constitution and the people's right to governance and self-governance. He believed that the president should have the power to prevent Congress from passing laws that he deemed unconstitutional or harmful to the interests of the American people. While Jackson's use of the veto power was controversial at the time, this cartoon reflects the view that his actions were motivated by a deep commitment to democratic principles and a desire to empower ordinary
Andrew Jackson, the first president from a western state, impacted American society due to his strong values, ideas, and personality. In regards to Democracy, Andrew Jackson had a huge role in transforming it. For one, Andrew Jackson had the goal of protecting the poor from the “tyranny of wealth and power”, and wanted to give other white men equal status no matter of their wealth or background (434). This had a major effect in politics since it gave more opportunities for the less wealthy to become involved. Jackson’s campaign involved turning the government into the “rule of the people”, although by people, he meant the addition of white men from lower classes (435).
In the year 1828, Andrew Jackson, America’s seventeenth president, was inaugurated into office. President Jackson brought about a significant number of changes that would later beset the nation in grave peril. Throughout his presidency, and after, his followers were known as Jacksonian-Democrats. They believed in a greater democracy for the common man. Jacksonian democrats were able to partially protect political democracy and the equality of economic opportunity, however they were not guardians of the constitution and its individual liberties.
The presidency of Andrew Jackson, from 1829 to 1837, has been widely regarded as a pivotal period in our American history, marked by both popular admiration and fierce opposition. During the election of 1828, Jackson’s legacy as the “Champion of the Common Man'' to protect the rights of the common people against the elitists resonated with the increasing democracy of many Americans. Jackson’s actions as president, however, sparked controversy from his opponents who only saw a tyrant monarch set to harm the constitutional order. While acknowledging the positive aspects Jackson made to his legacy, the negative consequences on the common man posed a challenge to the development of an equitable society. The Jacksonian Era, denoted by its mixed
The era of Andrew Jackson which was nicknames the era of the “common man” certainly lived up to its name. As the seventh President of the United States, Jackson had a major effect on the life of the common man, in such a way that the life of the common man would never be the same again. Jackson’s aim, after the manner in which he was defeated in the Presidential Election of 1824, despite receiving more popular votes than John Quincy Adams who took on the office, was to reduce the power and the authority of the elite. When he came into power after the 1828 election Jackson began to carry out his proposals. Jackson expanded the voting right to all men, in accordance with the Declaration of Independence of 1776 which declared that “all men are created equal” instead of just the elite.
Andrew Jackson was the seventh President of the United States holding two consecutive terms from 1829 to 1837. He was a proud to representative for the American working class. This paid off for Andrew Jackson as he was one of the first presidents elected into office by earning a majority of the popular vote. Andrew Jackson’s inauguration brought thousands of Americans from around the country to witness the swearing-in of their new President, Andrew Jackson and First Lady Rachel Donelson. Andrew Jackson had a strong belief of democracy which he carried through his presidency.
Andrew Jackson was a president in the United States and very important in the American History. For some he was a popular guy but others disliked him strongly. Andrew Jackson was democratic. Some may say that he isn’t; this topic is still argued about to this day. Back then people had the idea that democracy was understood as someone who listened to the people and did what they asked in the terms of the government.
How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson? Jackson was born in the year 1767 to a poor family. When he was only 13 years old he was captured from the British during the revolutionary war. As he got older he found himself in the military and he was called a national hero when he fought in the battle of 1812. He served for two terms as president and Jacksonian or is followers say that he was democratic where the people are heard.
He also thought that the National Bank stood in the way of opportunity for capitalists in the west and other regions. This clearly shows that Jackson had the interest of all people, the cornerstone of democracy. The article “Jackson’s Inauguration”, is another document that shows how democratic Andrew Jackson really was. This article shows how Andrew Jackson opened up the White House in celebration of his upcoming presidency. Some people saw this as a bad thing.
Also he wanted the offices that are solely to benefit the people so that no man has more rights than another. Finally, Jackson was not democratic because he wanted the Indians to move out of his land. So he decided to have the U.S. Soldiers move them west into the Indian territory.
Jacksonian Democracy Andrew Jackson was the cause for thousands of American Indian’s deaths. A good democracy has equal rights, an educated leader and voters, peace/stability, and a strong leader. It also has voting rights, the power in the hands of the people and checks and balances. Someone who promotes democracy will take both sides into consideration before making a decision. Someone who thinks about what his/her actions would do to the group as a whole and not just a fraction of the group.
Born into a non-aristocratic poor family, somewhere in the Carolina’s on March 14, 1767, was a man named Andrew Jackson. Jackson, also called “Old Hickory” was a very bold proactive man in American history. From being a military hero and founding the democratic party to enacting the trail of tears and dismantling the of the Bank of the United States, the man and his legacy are a prominent topic for scholarly debate. Some believe he was a great president and some believe he was the worse president. But if you look at it from a moral perceptive or in the eyes of a foreigner, Jackson’s legacy was far more villainous than heroic.