Andrew Jackson was a contradictory president who had many constitutional and unconstitutional arguments when it came to using his executive power, such as when he vetoed the Maysville Road Bill and the Second National Bank, which was either based on his own personal bias, or how beneficial it would be to the United States. Therefore justifying whether he was vetoing a bill based on actually analyzing the institutions and effects of their removal or result of arbitrary decisions with little analysis is based on ones perspective. The vetoing of the Second National Bank and the Maysville Road Bill is great example of how he used his vetoing powers and in what regard.
The vetoing of the Maysville Road Bill is controversial. There are controversies
…show more content…
These faults included overextended credit and improperly regulating money among the states. Furthermore, the hesitation of the First National Bank accompanied the Second National Bank. This hesitation was from the states, and their concern with how the National Bank would interfere with the states way of regulating money. The states argued using the 10th amendment that they have the right to regulate their own banks, since it is not stated in the Constitution that the United States had the power to regulate the banks within a state. Therefore Jackson questioned the validity of the bank and whether the bank was constitutional. Jackson as well contemplated whether the bank benefited the “common people.” He argued that the wealthy and elite economically benefited more from the national bank than compared to the rest of the public or “common people.” After Jackson saw all perspectives of the national bank he chose to deny the bill to recharter the second national bank. So Andrew Jackson used his highest executive power to overrule the supreme court and the Congress on their decision to pass the bill of rechartering the bank. This veto is a demonstration of how he analyzed the effects and the removal of the bank, and how he made a decision based on the welfare of the Unites States rather than vetoing based on his own personal
As the result, Andrew Jackson vetoed the Recharter Bill. He believed the bank held too much power, both politically and economically. Jackson also felt it was unconstitutional. He said that the bank was an exclusive
Andrew Jackson vetoed the bill re-chartering the Second Bank in July 1832 by arguing that in the form presented to him it was incompatible with “justice,” “sound policy” and the Constitution. The bank’s charter was unfair, Jackson argued in his veto message, because it gave the bank considerable, almost monopolistic, market power, specifically in the markets that moved financial resources around the country and into and out of other nations. That market power increased the bank’s profits and thus its stock price, “which operated as a gratuity of many millions [of dollars] to the stockholders,” who, Jackson claimed, were mostly “foreigners” and “our own opulent citizens.” He then suggested that it would be fairer to most Americans to create a wholly government-owned bank instead, or at least to auction the Second Bank of the US’s monopoly privileges to the highest bidder.
In fact, the reason he took apart the bank was to defend the common people and their profits. For one thing, the bank would give loans to the rich with intention to help their company flourish, but refused to loan the farmers more land to grow crops in which is their source of income. Therefore, the common people would be deprived of food and would constantly struggle to feed their family while the affluent who already have heaps of money are given more to purchase luxuries. Clearly this disparity was unjust, due to this Andrew Jackson ordered the secretary of treasury to transfer all federal deposits from the bank and put the money into the state banks during 1833. Another essential point is that Andrew Jackson exemplified strong leadership qualities as he frequently listened and understood the people's concerns.
Andrew Jackson has used his powers that were given to him in his presidency. Jackson shutdown the second national bank with a veto. Andrew Jackson was elected president in 1824 and again in 1832. People said that Jackson would act like a King and not a presidente. Andrew Jackson was not a champion of democracy because he misused his ability to veto he also, abused the spoil system finally while he was the president's slavery went up.
The national bank was a system conceived to supposedly centralize a prominent economic system. Although this system seemed only beneficial to wealthy citizens and not the regular citizens. In the President Jackson's Veto Message Regarding the Bank of the United States (1832) document it states that “every man is equally entitled to protection by law; but when the laws undertake to... to make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of society-the farmers, mechanics, and laborers-who have neither the time nor the means of securing like favors to themselves, have a right to complain of the injustice of their Government.” This demonstrates how the rich manipulate the government for their own purposes, but this shouldn’t be the case. Instead of a society that manipulates the government, there should be a society that everyone is equal under the law.
In Jackson's Bank Veto Message, he states that his principal reason for his veto was that he wanted to prevent the existence of monopolies. This is a fine reasoning that also goes along with is political views. The objection to this is that he was warned on how it would be detrimental to the United States economy but still went through with it. It cannot be overlooked that he had to fire two different secretaries until he finally appointed a close friend to agree with him. This is an obvious abuse of power, seeing as he fired two people simply for telling him that his idea would not work.
Accessed October 12, 2015. http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm? smtID=3&psid=3923. “President Jackson 's Veto Message Regarding the Bank of the United States; July 10, 1832.” Yale Law School Lillian Goldman Law Library The Avalon Project.
Andrew Jackson Andrew Jackson, the 7th president of the United States, murdered a man cold blooded, he was then elected to be in the highest position in office. Andrew Jackson was a man that thought his way or the highway. Jackson even though was a man of the people that doesn’t make up for what he did. On May 30, 1806 Jackson got in a duel with Charles Dickinson because he accused Jackson of cheating in a horse race then insulted his wife.
How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson? Jackson was born in the year 1767 to a poor family. When he was only 13 years old he was captured from the British during the revolutionary war. As he got older he found himself in the military and he was called a national hero when he fought in the battle of 1812. He served for two terms as president and Jacksonian or is followers say that he was democratic where the people are heard.
Jackson 's push to abolish national banks other wise known as "the bank wars" was one of his more well known pushes for small government. In 1832, Jackson had vetoed a bill calling for an early renewal of the Second Bank’s charter, but renewal was still possible when the charter expired
In the document “Jackson Battles the Bank”, it shows Jackson fighting off a monster, or the national bank, with a veto stick. Jackson was fighting to destroy the national bank. He wanted to do this because it favored the rich and not the common people. He was fighting for people to have equal rights. Instead of having no bank at all, he came up with the idea to create state banks which wouldn’t be as powerful as the National Bank.
This is just one of the many examples of Jackson’s vetoes. While Jackson vetoed 12 bills in his time of presidency, other presidents at the time vetoed either none or no more than about 7. At the time, 12 vetoes was quite a lot compared to the other presidents. He had vetoes so many laws because he wanted to be the only person running the government. This is another example of his abuse of power.
He mistrusted paper money greatly, as well as believed in power to the common people. Andrew Jackson feared the Bank’s power. He was afraid of the Bank becoming stronger and lending that power to the elite without holding accountability towards them, something he believed great powers should have; accountability. Jackson specifically stated that he believed the Bank made “the rich richer and the potent more powerful.” Jackson liked the so-called farmer’s economy since it motivated people to be hardworking and independent.
One of the biggest thing that Jackson had done as a president was in 1832. Jackson vetoed a bill that would renew the second bank charter early. Jackson stated “I will kill it!”. He said this because he didn’t like the bank at all and he believed that it made the rich richer and the poor poorer. He said in his veto message “It is easy to conceive that great evils to our country and its institutions might flow from such a concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people.”
In addition, Jackson felt that the executive branch had more power than the judicial branch with this bill. On the other hand, the Bank War of 1832 resides as Jackson and Daniel Webster had conflicting opinions over the Bank’s charter in Doc 3. The intended audience for this document is Jackson, as he was the person that vetoed the bill. The purpose of this document is to inform Jackson of the consequences of