The Death of Anna Grace From the outside anna Garcia's house looks like any other house, but after looking closer we find a crime scene.The deceased body of Anna Garcia was found face-down in the hallway of her home. Pills, a tipped over chair, news paper, and a cup were found Many questions were raised what happened,who did it, and when. But the most important is how, how did Anna die. Was she murdered, and if so why. Forensic evidence will tell us why Upon entering the room where anna had died beside the body the blood The blood is the is the second thing to stand out.the blood recovered scene of the crime belonged to Anna or Erica Piedmont (suspect). After further investigations we found that the blood had belonged …show more content…
but unlike blood the fingerprint is unique to a single person. The fingerprints that were recovered show the they belonged to anna. After analyzing the patterns of the fingerprint found and comparing them to and all of the suspects. They belonged to Anna. hair was recovered on the scene. Hair, like fingerprints can tell us if there was another person involved,the sex,raics, and sometimes the age. On the corner of the table was hair, it was determined to belong to Anna. Also found at the crime scene were pills next to anna. After analyzing the pill we found that they were acetylsalicylic acid AKA aspirin. lastly there was a muddy shoe print found. After it was analyzed it was determined to belong to Anna's shoes. My theory is that Anna is a diabetic and had just come home from a stressful day, she got the paper,throw it on the table went to get some aspirin and something to drink, and had an embolism and caused a blood clot, hit her head tried to get the phone to call 911 but had been too weak and died. That is what i believe is a possibility to the death of Anna Garcia. We will be investigating the death of anna graecea. She was foun’q’r’’’’chair her,blood ,fingerprints , shoes
We know that the fingerprints belonged to Alex Garcia. After examining the fingerprints found on the overturned table, we matched the ridges to the fingerprints of Anna Garcia and all the suspects, which resulted in Alex Garcia’s fingerprint matching to the crime scene fingerprints. We also identified the substance of the pills found on the floor next to the ground. After testing several possible substances, aspirin matched the crime scene substance, therefore the pills Anna took were Aspirin (also the toxicology report revealed she has trace amounts of aspirin in her body). We determined whose footprints were found at the crime scene by comparing it to the soles of the shoes of Anna Garcia and all the suspects.
In 2003, the Innocence Project filed a motion for DNA testing on skin cells collected at autopsy from underneath the victim’s fingernails. Because she has defense wounds on her hands the biological evidence form the attacker could be under her fingernails. She had defense wounds on her hands, meaning that biological evidence from the attacker could be under her fingernails. The DNA test results showed that male DNA under Tina’s fingernails did not come from Chad or Jeremy Heins. Additional testing in 2005 showed that the profile from the hairs was consistent with the DNA from the fingernails, all belonging to a single, unknown male.
June 14, 1962 Anna Slesers was found in her bathroom with a cord around her neck tied in a bow. This was the first of 13 murders believed to have been committed by Albert DeSalvo, the Strangler. Slesers was
Forensic testing suggests the corpses of Nicholas, Alexandra and three of their children were among the bodies. British scientists compared their DNA with samples of Anderson’s hair, and found no match. However, Anderson did seem to have extremely similar DNA results to blood samples taken from the grand-nephew of Franziska Schanzkowska”(Mystery Files; Anastasia/Anna Anderson). The moment pneumonia took over the body, Anderson’s DNA was tested and even with the advancements in DNA testing technology, was found to have no relation with the Tsar and Tsarina.
In September of 1961, a woman from District of Columbia had an intruder break into her apartment. While the invader of the home was there, they had taken her wallet, and also raped the woman. During the investigation of the crime, the police had found some latent fingerprints in the apartment. The police then established and processed the prints. The prints were then connected back to 16 year old Morris A. Kent.
An autopsy has been scheduled for Tuesday, and more details will be released after the examination, police said. Officers investigated the scene, blocking off a large portion of the street, until around 8:45 p.m. Jose Aponte, 40, who lives in the house in front of where the body was found, was coming home from work when he heard there was a body found in front of his house. He said he initially thought it was
There was no blood. And so there was no way to conduct a conclusive DNA test. But there was that strand of hair. At a key stage in the 1992 rape and burglary trial.
The prosecution presented evidence by analyzing bloodstains found in the Sheppard house. The authorities had a key to Shepherd's cottage during the trial, so his attorneys could not get enough evidence until the problem was over. A criminologist found. Based on blood splatter, the killer was left-handed, and Sheppard was right-handed. There was also a large blood spot on the bedroom closet door.
Madison Corey FSC-224-202 17 April 2023 Case Study #3 - The Atlanta Child Killer, Wayne Williams Fiber and hair evidence are often compared and examined during testing. It can link individuals, locations, and items. When trying to connect a suspect to a victim or a crime scene, trace evidence such as hairs and fibers may be very useful. The presence of hairs can link a suspect to a victim or a suspect/victim to a crime scene due to hairs being transmitted via physical contact. Wayne Williams was able to be found guilty of several murders with these pieces of evidence.
In the lab report three students are tested along with one suspect. Student number two’s DNA matched the suspects DNA. The student’s DNA’s are cut with five different enzymes as well as the suspects DNA. Student two’s DNA matched exactly with the suspects DNA; the other two student’s DNA did not resemble the suspects DNA at all. (Choi, et al, 2008) DNA fingerprinting is used a lot in determining who committed a crime.
When found, her body was unrecognisable according to the Police Officer in charge of the investigation, Inspector Wayne King. Within three days (Thursday 26) of the body being discovered,
“But the evidence will show he directed her off the highway to a dark, secluded where he strangled her with a rope and threw her body off a bridge.” Desloup stated (pg 1). As stated in the case, the murder weapon was a rope, as she died because of strangulation. After the murder,
There was many people question by the police about the death of Amy LaTour. The evidence from Amy’s death seems to be a murder, pointing her maid Celeste. I believe Celeste strangled her with her scarf and she did it out of pure jealousy. First of all, evidence from the picture shows the door cracked open which means that whoever it was, snuck in.
There was multiply evidence that, traced back to O.J. Simpson. His blood was recovered and fingerprints were local on the back fence. Later they found his hair in a knit hat at the crime scene, which the same kind of fiber was found on Goldman’s clothing. Fibers from simpson’s car were also similar to the knit hat. In his vehicle, he had blood from both victims and a pair of bloody socks in his house, along with the right glove that was missing from the crime scene.
Was Anna sending him messages or was he just thinking that she was sending him messages? Why doesn’t she like Mr. Devon, the unnamed boyfriend’s favorite teacher? Why does her father not have eyebrows? The final question everyone wants to know, “Is Anna dead?” These questions still remain unanswered in the story.