Annotated Bibliography
Archbald, D. A., Newmann, F. M., 1988, Beyond Standardized Testing: Assessing Authentic Academic Achievement in the Secondary School. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED301587 This book is planned to serve as a calculation of standardized testing and its substitutions at the subordinate institute level (Archbald, Newmann, 1988). Supplementary precisely, an outline for rational analytically and imaginatively concerning testing, an evaluation of the procedures and restrictions of standardized tests of overall accomplishment, and explanations of more than a few ways and means that might make a suggestion more cooperative methods to calculation are delivered. Entirely three precise mechanisms are
…show more content…
(2016). A Review of Standardized Testing in Mathematics, a Case Study Regarding the State of Connecticut. Insights to a Changing World Journal, 1266-283.retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=3&sid=14a4a946-5305-4855-8067-b2abc2351a14%40sessionmgr103&hid=123
This is a case study of standardized testing in which the authors attempt to shed more light on the debate of standardized testing. The normal math totals from above 13 years of the “Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT)” were studied to see if any major alterations were among the three faculties (Map, & Kennedy 2016). They also witnessed the promotion rates within the schools and linked to the development of the CAPT mean mathematics totals in excess of a period of time. A survey was well-arranged for high school instructors specified that the instructors from numerous adjacent and comparable regions do not overpoweringly provision the extensive practice of the standardized tests. They used both the quantitative and qualitative statistics which had contradictory consequences. Mapp and Kennedy address federal government through such laws as the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), the 2002 No Child Left behind (NCLB) Act and the NCLB Act which was proven to involve all states to include their own traditional standards to be established yearly at the prime and lesser level of teaching. These authors discuss why antagonist
…show more content…
He put great emphases on the real-world and the ethical associations of standardized tests and the research of pre-examination of educators as they communicate to the pupil calculation and course enactment. He also put forth an effort to discover resolutions to the difficulties educators and potential educators come across on an educational level with concerns to standardized testing. He offers information concerning teacher preparation programs and the teacher as a leader. He also gives some insight on curriculum, instruction, testing, transnational analysis, assessment, and ethics. Within this work the author explain why it is unethical to associate testing deprived of considering the work of the classroom, scholar education styles, and different procedures of recital. The author gives an understanding as to why these thoughts were vital works of ethical rehearses, and why inappropriate custom of standardized test outcomes would no longer exist, or at least be evaded. He shades some light on the practice of standardized tests as an individual portion of a scholar’s theoretical growth and enactment is challenging at its’ highest and unethical at
Exploratory Paper: Is Standardized Testing Bad? Standardized testing has been around in one form or the other for centuries based on historical data which shows its use way back in imperial China and was used to determine the strengths and talents of individuals so that they could be effectively used in the emperor’s service. In the 19th century Great Britain introduced standardized testing to its’ territories and eventually Europe. The United States introduced standard testing to its citizens in the late 20th century and has rapidly integrated this testing tool into the nation’s public school system.
Even though many students absolutely hate them, state assessments are a big part of the American education system. Everyone has taken a standardized test at some point in their life, and almost everyone has done poorly on one. They are primarily used as a measurement of how well students learn, but are they truly accurate? There are strong arguments on both sides, which has started a heated conflict about the productiveness of these tests. Standardized testing has been around for many years, starting in Imperial China where it was intended to determine a person’s aptitude for a government position (“Do Standardized Tests Show an Accurate View of Students’ Abilities?”).
In identifying why these standardized tests exist, the hope is to generate a metric which will be used to analyze whether the current standardized testing system is sufficient and identify both areas of strength and weakness. The ultimate hope is to answer the question, “What is the purpose of state-mandated standardized tests for public elementary and middle schools, and how well to they fulfill this purpose,” and by doing so, improve standardized
Standardized testing has become a very controversial topic amongst the nation. There are two sides, one that agrees that these tests are doing well for students and school officials, and another that argues that these tests are hurting the students taking them and should be put to a stop. Norman R. Augustine wrote an article for the need of standardized testing, and Jessie B. Ramey States the ways that the tests are impairing the learning capability of the students. Norman uses three arguments that people opposing the standardized test would most often use.
Standardized tests are one of the most popular ways schools attempt to evaluate academic intelligence of students, school districts, and teachers. These tests are used more specifically to evaluate student performance in the education system by testing their abilities in mathematics, english and sciences. By giving every student the same test, they are setting a standard idea for how well every student should score on the test, such as the SAT or the ACT, no matter the school or educational process they are receiving. Allowing every student to take the exact same test, gives the state a way to generalize student’s academic intelligence without having to do much work to make the testing one hundred percent fair. Standardized testing in schools should no longer be required because it discriminates against the less wealthy families, does not effectively measure achievement and becomes a distraction to the student’s learning environment.
In fact, the increasing use of standardized testing will do more damage than good, because of its failure to capture the entirety of a student’s body of work. Furthermore, the overwhelming stress that the United States government, and school systems have placed on the usage of standardized tests has become detrimental to American education, and is not the most effective way to gauge the intelligence of American students. The American educational system should be fixated on providing each child enough attention and information so they can succeed in that class and in the future. However, the increasing focus on having to pass a standardized test has blinded schools of the real goal, because they are required to get their students to pass the standardized tests.
Today I will talk about how standardized tests should be modified. I will be talking about how standardized tests are taking up too much class time and they need to be shorter. Standardized tests should be shorter they take up too much time and children have no fun at all with just worrying about the test. Standardized tests take all the fun out of a child's day. This essay will persuade the reader the the government needs to modify the test’s because they are taking up too much time, they are sucking the joy out of children because they have to worry about the tests, and that the test just repeats what they already tested on.
The state of Texas has been in a constant struggle within itself over just how to evaluate education, and standardized testing in Texas has been a major influencer in terms of the state’s standards for over thirty years. Though these methods of testing have been utilized for decades, resentment to the tests have been continuously rising among educators, parents, and students, but not everyone agrees. Despite government officials trying to quell these protests with changes to administration, and the way the test itself is formatted and formulated, there seems to have been little to no improvement made and those opposing the tests have started calling for an end to all standardized testing. For one to truly understand this ongoing struggle, one must first look at standardized testing’s beginning, then how government today is trying to fix the broken system, and finally consider the opinions of notable figures in the testing world.
All students dread one thing when it comes to school - testing. Standardized test are the main focus in our school systems instead of actually gaining knowledge at the end of the year. As a mother, Michelle Rhee, understands the lack of attention given on education as a whole instead of just waiting on the scores, but she still agrees on continuing with standardized test. Kristina Rizga opposes the opinion of Michelle Rhee as she does not believe standardized test truly measure the intelligence of a student. Kristina Rizga proves her stand against standardized test by utilizing solid use of argumentation.
Some might argue that while standardized testing has its flaws, it must still be in place because it is good for using a common measure to help see what changes are needed d to help improve the school. For example, in the paper “What is the case for Standardized testing,” author Lauren Crawford evaluates how standardized testing is useful for many schools, and talks about how schools have used standardized testing to help turn things around saying, “ In older grades standardized testing measures where students rate in comparison with their peers and thus how the student and his teachers are doing (Bagin, 1994). While these tests do rate students according to how well they do on these tests, some schools have used these scores to reform their systems and, in turn, drastically improve their methods (Wolf et al., 2000). Schools in economically devastated areas like the ones in eastern Kentucky under the strong leadership of their principals and the dedication of
Standardized testing has become one of the most popular types of testing in U.S. public schools to date. Students take numerous standardized tests throughout their childhood schooling. (Studies show that a typical student takes an average of 112 mandated standardized tests between Pre-K and 12th grade.) While standardized testing is one of the main procedures that Universities use to judge incoming students, it is not proven to be the most effective way to convey a student’s actual intelligence level. The U.S. should not focus so heavily on standardized testing because it is not a complete accurate measurement of a student’s intelligence.
Introduction Standardized tests may be used for a wide variety of educational purposes. For example, they may be used to determine a young child’s readiness for kindergarten, identify students who need special-education services or specialized academic support, place students in different academic programs or course levels, or award diplomas and other educational certificates. Thesis Statement Standardized tests should not be eliminated completely, but should rather be evaluated in addition to other factors such as grades, extracurricular activities, and volunteer hours. This would take pressure off of students during standardized tests, allow colleges to see how well-rounded the students are, and give students who are better in other areas
\Cizek, (2022), argues that high stakes testing has led to a "cultural shift in education, from a focus on teaching and learning to a focus on testing and accountability". He suggests that this shift has been detrimental to both teachers and students, as it has reduced the flexibility and creativity of instruction and led to a greater emphasis on rote memorization. Researcher reported that an assessment method that is used to make important decisions about students, teachers, and schools. They indicated that the pressure to perform well on these tests can lead to high levels of stress among teachers, which can in turn affect their job satisfaction and performance (Al-Musawi & Anderson, 2022).
Testing and Standards In Reign of Error, Ravitch argues that standardized test scores in reading and mathematics are higher than ever before. This goes against the claim that test scores are declining evincing our broken educational system. Moreover, in the past forty years, the science and mathematics tests have gotten much more difficult (44). The idea of relying on standardized test scores to student achievement was introduced by Ted Bell in the 1970s (Goldstein, 168). Later on, with No Child Left Behind under the Bush administration and Race to the Top under Obama’s presidency, standardized tests were used for accountability.
One of the significant disadvantages of standardized testing is not enhance study achievement. According to Education Week (2000), it raised several concerns about testing objective they suggest that “The main objective of these tests is to rank, not to rate; to spread out the scores, not to gauge the quality of a given student or school.” The real purpose of testing is not focusing on benefit of the student can obtain from testing. However, they only focus and challenge on the ranking.