Anthropology Questions:
1. Was this crime indicative of the beliefs, morals, and culture of the two aggressors?
2. Were there any scratch marks found on the victim? Were there any fingernails found at the scene of the crime?
3. Is there a specific indication as to why the crime was committed in such a harsh manner? Why was such excessive force used against an elderly man?
Psychology Questions:
1. Is at least one person involved in the crime able to feel guilty, remorseful, or fearful for their potential future in jail or the well-being of the victim? Will at least one perpetrator be able to successfully justify his actions?
2. Were each of the two men involved in the crime mentally unstable? Could this have been a factor as to why the crime was committed?
3. What was the motive behind the two perpetrators beating the virtually helpless 73-year old man? If they knew he was old and most likely weak, why didn’t they simply steal what they needed to, and evacuate the store? Was it a way of expressing some form of anger towards someone who they knew couldn’t fight back?
…show more content…
This deals with the thoughts, intentions and reactions of criminals. This also includes all that partakes in the criminal behaviour. In comparison to anthropological criminology, psychology deals with everything that makes the criminal “tick”, as opposed to the physical evidence. The questions that I formed can easily be related to the article because they are thought-provoking, and they ask about the actual intentions and thought process related to the crime. All of my questions could explain why certain things happened that was stated in the article, including why cigarettes and money was stolen, why the crime was committed at 4:00 AM, and many more. I determined these questions by thinking about what professional profilers might ask if they were studying this crime as
The film “Murder by Number” also includes medical issues, including brain damage, as contributing to the violence of many serial killers. Some criminologists and psychiatrists believe that serial killers kill because of issues with their families. These issues include failure to properly bond with
Mr. Johnston tried to evade the crime scene and struck the officer during the process. Mr. Johnston was connected to a sting of church burglaries. Mr. Johnston was arrested with possession of drugs and a knife. The court’s purpose of the forensic evaluation is to determine if Mr. Johnston is competent to stand trial; intellectual status, and risk. This evaluation will start with assessing his psychological behavior through a clinical interview and mental status evaluation to shape the diagnostic impression.
Trait Theory: Biological Trait theory categorizes people on the basis of their skin color, ethnicity, gender, and their body built. In this case, Mr Obkuku is a built black male, a mesomorph. Well known stereotype that people with darker skin tend to commit more crimes; especially trafficking narcotics and theft.
The offender decides whether or not the choice will be beneficial. Even though everything cannot be possibly thought out and planned by an offender perfectly but they can rely on the course things taking place at the time of the
Serial homicide is among the less common, but most heinous crimes an individual can commit. The vicious act of murder is unfathomable to most human beings, but research is not lacking in the attempt to provide an explanation. Criminological research is notorious for integrating theoretical perspectives to create an overarching explanation for different crimes. This paper will attempt to provide some insight to the crime of serial homicide. The difference between homicide and murder as outlined in the Criminal Code will be presented.
Normally, the profile provides a list of information intended to help law enforcement agencies in their investigation of a crime. The main focus of the criminal profile is on the social and behavioral characteristics of the killer. Some authorities perceive criminal profiling as a combination of brainstorming, intuition and educated guesses, however, the criminal profiling process is far more complex than that. Accurate profiling requires a careful compilation of theories and premises from psychology, sociology, psychiatry and criminology. Each of these subfields makes a different contribution to the criminal
Perry’s disturbing past urges both the reader and the townspeople to view the culprit’s entire story from a moral standpoint. Thus, this causes them to empathize with him and question whether such a brutal punishment should be inflicted upon a man who may potentially have mental issues. The uncertainty that arises in the minds of the townspeople is portrayed in the prosecutor’s conversation with the newsman after Perry is hanged.
While a few theories are not as regular, others have developed and are utilized as a part of numerous criminal reviews today. Cutting edge criminologists consolidate the most important aspects of sociology, psychology, anthropology, and biological theories to advance their comprehension of criminal behavior. Rational choice theory, psychological, biological, and strain theory are used to analyze the
Criminal Justice Psychologist The psychologist is a vital asset to the criminal justice system. The psychologist can examine victims, police officials and various witnesses thus making them ethically obligated to make the right decisions and evaluations. This essay will discuss the roles of psychologist as they work within the criminal justice system. I will Identify and describe the psychologists’ roles within the criminal justice system as it pertains to the applied scientist, the basic scientist, the policy evaluator, and the advocate.
The film, My Cousin Vinny, is a comedy crime film that was written by Dale Launer. My Cousin Vinny was released to the public for viewing in 1992 on March 13. The film tells the story of two boys, Billy Gambini (Ralph Macchio), and Stan Rothenstein (Mitchel Whitfield) who were on their way to attend college at UCLA. While traveling from New York to California, they made a stop at a store in a small town in Alabama. Minutes after leaving the store they were stopped by police and taken to the station for questionings.
It does not consider other factors such as criminal associations, individual traits, and inner strains, which plays a significant role in determining punishment for the individuals in committing crimes. It is observed that this theory endeavours to know that whether the activities of crime as well as the victim’s choice, criminals commit the activities on start from rational decisions. The theory also determines that criminals consider different elements before committing crime. They engage in the exchange of ideas before reaching on any final decision. These elements consist of consequences of their crimes, which include revealing their families to problems or death, chances of being arrested, and others elements, which comprises of placement of surveillance systems (Walsh & Hemmens, 2010; Lichbach,
Roy Brown was convicted of a crime he didn’t do in New York in 1991(Post-Tribune).Accordingly the he victim Sabina Kulakowski was found naked across the road from her home in the town of Aurelius in the early hour of may 23 1991. Kerlikowski was a 49 and put up struggles with the victim the crime seem to be personal because there was no evidence of rape or burglary. She suffered from many wounds including bite marks. Roy Brown was sentence to a minimum of 15 years in prison for this crime he didn’t commit in May of 1991. Sabrina was killed stabbed and strangled to death and the crime was place on roy brown.
Reinforcing the concept of degradation, he placed in and on the victims sex toys and sexual propaganda 4. His crimes were committed within a small geographic area of which he was familiar. 5. He showed a steadily increasing ability to kill swiftly, without pause. This was indicated by the defense wounds or lack thereof on the
There are many different modes of criminological thinking and two of those are Cultural criminology and administrative criminology. Both of these concepts are vastly different to each other which Mike Presdee delves into in Cultural Criminology: The long and winding road (2004). According to Presdee (2004), administrative criminology “denies and rejects the importance of culture and lived experience in the commission of crime, preferring instead to concentrate on the pseudo-scientific analysis of criminal behaviour” (Presdee, 2004:276). Administrative criminology has been fabricated as overdetermined descriptive criminology which is disconnected from any sort of social or human interaction.
The law gives us two kinds of murder as well—“Intent-to-kill” and “Grievous-bodily-harm”. Two key concepts in the common law and its types of murders—“malice aforethought” and “bodily harm”—will help us define Dudley and Stephens’ case as a murder or killing. Malice aforethought refers to the “premeditation”, or planning one takes to kill another individual; yet, it has the connotation of a general evil and depraved state of mind in which the person is unconcerned for the lives of others. In this case, both Dudley and Stephens survive, making malice aforethought inapplicable to their circumstances. If Dudley or Stephens were to have malice aforethought, it would be more probable that one of the men would have killed the other two and both of the men would have killed Parker shortly after their depletion of food.