ipl-logo

Anti-Trust Claim: Case Study

261 Words2 Pages

Facts: Beacon (B) and Fox (F) ran movie theaters. B objected to F’s practice of exercising rights to be the first to show a movie before anyone else could. B pursued an anti-trust claim. In response, F sought a judicial declaration that F in fact had not run afoul of anti-trust rules, and that B would be enjoined from pursuing B’s claim until the matter in re the declaration could be heard by the court. But B filed an anti-trust counter claim. The court sided with F, taking the position that it could only adjudicate the F claim before it addressed the B claim, assuming the court decided B had a claim. Not wanting to have the matter split, B filed a writ so the court would hear both matters. History: The circuit court of appeal denied but

Show More
Related

  • Case Study: Mcfadden V. Seagoville State Bank

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    Id. at 8. However, the Court held that it was a genuine issue of material fact. Id. Tripling her commute was a question for the jury. Therefore summary judgment for the defendant was denied. Id. at 10.

    Read More

  • Case Study: Nestle V. South Carolina

    239 Words  | 1 Pages

    The court granted Nestles request for transfer of the action to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. Reason : The court pointed out that the plaintiff resides in South Carolina, her daughters injuries occurred there and her medical treatment was there and continues to be there therefore making South Carolina the appropriate place for the litigation to proceed. A court should not be required to expend resources on cases that have little relationship to the district

    Read More

  • Turner V Hershey Chocolate Case Analysis

    955 Words  | 4 Pages

    The appellant essential accommodation claim went to trial but court excluded evidence regarding to disability. The plaintiff’s is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However the issue should have been decided by jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual.

    Read More

  • Ella Mae Else Case Summary

    580 Words  | 3 Pages

    Besides, she did not deny the demand letter or state that $335,000 was not a reasonable value for her case. The court concludes that the demand letter provides more that sufficient evidence of the amount in controversy and the defendant has met its Burden and denied the plaintiff 's Motion to Remand. I do not agree with the court decision to deny the Plaintiff notion the Remand. I believe the Plaintiff should be able to more money in compensatory damages because if she had lost her life, there is no money in the world that would bring her back.

    Read More

  • The Impartiality And Independence Of Judge Jimbo Kern

    1138 Words  | 5 Pages

    Kern has in the ruling of the case. It is known to the court that J. Kern holds a small number of shares of the Fabulous Inn property. This gives him financial disadvantage if he would rule in favor of Bebe as it would disadvantage the Fabulous Inn, where the incident happened. The court has the obligation to be impartial, if there is reasonable ground to doubt a person’s impartiality, the decisional authority cannot participate in the process.

    Read More

  • Essay On Sherman Act

    598 Words  | 3 Pages

    When analyzing a Section 1 Sherman Act violation under the rule of reason, the court will review “whether the restraint imposed is justified by legitimate business purposes and is no more restrictive than necessary.” The defendant will not be guilty of violating anti-trust laws if the defendant can prove that the restraint of trade had a legitimate purpose to further their business by using the least restrictive means to achieve

    Read More

  • Liberty: A Voluntary Argument In Controversy

    79 Words  | 1 Pages

    Moreover, it is not clear to a legal certainty that Liberty could not recover the requisite amount in controversy. In calculating the amount in controversy, both money damages and injunctive relief are considered. Even if Liberty could only recover the $60,456.25 in money damages alleged in its motion for summary judgment, the injunctive relief sought has enough value to enable Liberty to reach the requisite amount in controversy. For these reasons, the judgment of the district court is reversed.

    Read More

  • A Case Summary Of Falstaff Brewing Company

    482 Words  | 2 Pages

      E.   Miller Brewing Company's complaint includes a preliminary injunction that is supported by insufficient, irrelevant evidence that the district court did not postulate. F.   Miller Brewing Company's argument was declined in an action against Falstaff, because the Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit decided adversely that the issue held no validity.   5.      C =

    Read More

  • SUTH DAKOTA V. WAYFAIR, Inc

    1531 Words  | 7 Pages

    Opinion of the Court SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 17-494 – Exam No. XXXXX STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA v.WAYFAIR, INC., ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH DAKOTA JUSTICE MARCUM delivered the opinion of the Court. INTRODUCTION Today, the petitioner asks this Court to review and overturn our stare decisis in a case this Court decided in 1997in Quill Corporation.

    Read More

  • Stringfellow Restaurants Ltd V. Quashie: Case Study

    141 Words  | 1 Pages

    The court of Appeal stated that lapdancers are not employees. According to the case Stringfellow Restaurants Ltd v Quashie, lapdancers are not employees. the facts of the case states that Ms Quashie worked as a lap dancer intermittently over a period of 18 months at two London clubs, Stringfellows and Angels. She was required to work on particular days every fortnight on a rota basis,the rules does nor prevent her from working elsewhere. She was paid and tipped for dances directly by the customers using per-purchased vouchers and she had to pay the clubs for the use of their facilities.

    Read More

  • JMOL Case Study

    655 Words  | 3 Pages

    The trial court denied both motions, and the plaintiff appealed to the state supreme court. That court ruled that the defendant 's evidence had been sufficient to raise a jury question regarding negligence and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs post-trial motions.

    Read More

  • Ethics Case Of Darling V. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital

    503 Words  | 3 Pages

    At the end of this case, the court had this to

    Read More

  • Case Study: Supermax Corporation Berhad

    974 Words  | 4 Pages

    SUPERMAX Corporation Berhad should be aware of their cultural differences in the workplace. Since there have a lot of different race in Malaysia and also most of the workers are from the different background so it can easily cause communication barrier happen between all the workers within the workplace. SUPERMAX should treat this issue seriously and handle it properly in order to avoid misunderstanding and tension between employees. It is vitally significant that there is a good relationship between all the employees and also the superior because it can affect the company’s productivity and efficiency. SUPERMAX should have cultural sensitivity in order to create a harmonious atmosphere in the workplace at the same time it can improve the performance of the company.

    Read More

  • Unethical Business Practices: A Case Study

    2662 Words  | 11 Pages

    1.0 Introduction Business ethics refers to what is right and wrong, good and bad, harmful and beneficial regarding decisions and actions in organizational transactions (Weiss, 2009). So how to identify the unethical business practices? It is very easily. For example, which are company use child labor, produce tainted products, false advertising, infringement, polluted environment and etc.

    Read More

  • Importance Of Stare Decisis In Malaysia

    814 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the said case, the counsel for the appellants tried to argue before the Court of Appeal that the decision in the case Rama Chandran v The Industrial Court of Malaysia & Anor was wrong. Because the court was heard in the Federal Court, the Court of Appeal disagreed. It was also

    Read More

More about Anti-Trust Claim: Case Study

Open Document