Introduction:
This experiment includes the use of a genome editing system in order to make E.coli cells resistant to the antibiotic streptomycin. The system uses a protein called Cas9. Guide RNA is used to guide the Cas9 to the targeted sequence of DNA. The Cas9 finds the match to the gRNA in the cell’s DNA and cuts it out. As the cell tries to repair the DNA, it uses the template DNA that was inserted into the cell, and results in the modified DNA. In the case of this experiment, the goal is to create streptomycin resistant E.coli. Streptomycin works by binding a ribosome to prevent it from making proteins, so the cell cannot replicate. The CRISPR-Cas9 system will work to change a single base from A to C which will code for a protein that prevents the streptomycin from binding to the ribosome. The expectation for the experiment is that the control bacteria will not survive
…show more content…
The p-value from the experiment was 0.0754, which shows that there were other factors affecting the experiment, since a p-value of less than 0.05 is required for an experiment to not be random chance. Also, 3 colonies in the first group, 5 colonies in the second group, and 34 colonies in the third group grew on the LB/Strep plate even though the bacterial cells were not genetically edited. This displays that other factors could have caused the bacteria to grow on the antibiotic infused plates, and that editing the DNA was not the only reason the bacteria grew on the LB/Strep plates. The experiment might not have worked due to possible pipetting error when transferring multiple aspects in the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Also, the antibiotic could have been defective, due to the fact that the unedited bacteria grew on the antibiotic. In addition, there could have been cross-contamination which would cause other bacterial colonies to grow that were resistant to the antibiotic in the first place. For all of the reasons stated, the experiment was
After Terrance visited with his PCP a sample was collected and necessary test were performed to determine what pathogen or bacteria was the cause of Terrance 's infection. In order to have a better understanding of what they are working with and how to
The purpose of this lab report is to employ a myriad of skills, tools and, methods learned throughout this semester to perform the appropriate tests for the identification of the assigned unknown bacteria. Add more background information here!!! The most important tools and techniques used during this identification include aseptic technique, microscopic examination and, the use of selective and differential media. Aseptic technique is an important tool for microbiologists. It is imperative that aseptic technique is maintained throughout the length of any test to avoid any cross-contamination that may lead to inaccurate results.
3. Scientists believed the newly infected individuals produced quality specimen and it was impossible to detect the microbe once the infected individual started to recover. Scientists wanted to compare patients blood antibody test from early in their illness to the end of their illness in which they found that
When antibiotics are used properly they can save thousands of lives, yet
Microbiology has proven that not everyone qualifies to undergo this procedure. Any aesthetic institute clinic takes this process seriously. Microbiology study reveals that some people react negatively to components found in a Botox injection. This happens by checking out a person’s medical report or conducting some tests. People who defy any medical expert’s reports and take the injection are prone to numerous risks.
Cancer, heart disease, blood disorders, nerve disorders, and many more genetic diseases are affecting millions of people around the world. The more society advances, the more degenerate diseases are affecting the citizens. For a number of years researchers have been searching for cures. With new developments in gene editing, treatments for many diseases are just around the corner. Gene editing with new technology, CRISPR, matches with a specific gene and splits the protein.
Firstly, CRISPR has been tested and proven to work on all types of cells, including those of plants, animals and microorganisms. Therefore, it can be used to alter the genes of other organisms as well as ours, giving them characteristics useful for us. For example, cow DNA could be edited for them to produce more milk, increasing the efficiency of the dairy industry. Secondly, CRISPR is much cheaper than alternative forms of genetic engineering. According to Gene Therapy Net, the components to produce and test a CRISPR-Cas9 system can cost as little as thirty dollars.
#1 CRISPR, also known as Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, is a gene editing technology which enables researchers to change the DNA of any organism. It is used by bacteria to protect themselves from infection by viruses ie used in yogurt and cheese to prevent growth of viruses which would infect the yogurt culture. Unlike other gene editing technology, CRISPR not only presents a new way of altering the DNA sequence, but it is also a cheaper alternative and it takes lesser time to achieve similar outcomes. Due to its many functions and it being easier to use, researchers are coming up with ideas of using it to make changes to human genes to eliminate diseases in the genetic system, create plants that are more resistant
Even though there’s been a huge success on research with animals it still is bad to test
This method is used in the engineering of proteins and allows the reproduction of molecules to enhance and create products that are important for human health and medicine (Orencia 2001, Bull and Wichman 2001). Directed evolution mimics the process of natural selection but in the laboratory. It has been specifically useful in predicting antibiotic resistance and in the engineering of antibiotics. For example, a study by Orencia and colleagues (2001), used directed evolution to predict future mutations which lead to increased resistance to antibiotics. Being able to create variants of existing molecules and selecting desired properties allows for the creation and enhancement of products beneficial to human health.
It allows genetic manipulation in a precise manner. “Crispr-Cas9 has already been used to genetically modify (nonviable) human embryos in China, to see if it is possible in principle,” (Ball, P, Online, 2018). It is clear that the devices needed to modify the genome are in existence and
Future developments could include the production of artemisin for malaria, a modified lactobacillus bacteria that attacks HIV, ethanol for fuel, and others (Locke). However, there are several valid objections to the use of genetic engineering in bacteria, as well as other organisms. The ability to manipulate and modify bacteria and other microorganisms also opens the door for misuse of the technology. The creation of Biological weapons such as a more virulent form of anthrax (Willis), or the creation of more potent toxins, as well as the development of antibiotic resistant bacteria for weapons use are very real possibilities.
The emerging field of synthetic biology and genomic editing has sparked a biological revolution. The possible applications of these techniques for the advancement of health, technology, industry, and agriculture seem endless. However, these new advancements have also raised national security concerns. There has been an expressed concern, by the United States government, for the ease of use and accessibility of these technologies and for their use as a biological weapon (Coats, 2017). It is imperative that these concerns over synthetic biology as a bioterrorism tool does not overshadow the benefits of these technologies.
Gene Editing Gene editing is a hot new topic in the world of science and is being recognized by many for its ability to allow scientist to manipulate the genome of any living creature using specialized tools to edit the DNA. Essentially science is unveiling how we could potentially play God in the very near future by editing a person’s genome to remove disease or create designer babies for prospecting parents. These four articles provide a solid overview of gene editing, specifically the tool CRISPR/Cas9 which allows the scientist working with them to manipulate the removal of gene sequences that might otherwise produce an ill effect upon the patient or embryo. All four articles bring to light that CRISPR/Cas9 is a tool that will allow scientist