Gun control challengers will argue that the 2nd amendment was not only put in place for self-defense but to guarantee that the nation will not be overrun by any military power. Guns are used for self-defense purposes more than 2 million times a year, that’s 3 to 5 times the estimated number of violent crimes committed with guns. They also believe if the United States military were to be beaten by a foreign power; the only national defense left would be the American people. If the government took the citizens guns away they would not be able to defend America from foreign powers or from any other challenger. The first modern school shooting in the United States was on august 1, 1996 at the University of Austin. Austin police were seriously outgunned but were quickly helped when several students and civilians ran to their own vehicles to bring back their hunting rifles. They stood along with the officers and shot at the intruder and later killed him. Without the help of the students and civilians the police would not have been able to stop the shooter quickly enough and he would have killed more than 12 people. Rampage killers like the one that shot at the University of …show more content…
By average they have 24 percent lower violent crime, 19 percent lower murder rate and 39 percent lower robbery rate than states that don’t allow citizen to carry concealed weapons. (According to Lunger, “Gun-rights supporters have their own vision of the way society should work. In that vision, guns play an important part in bolstering individual freedoms and protecting private citizens from both crime and governmental tyranny. Their position is that guns both save lives and reduce crime.”)(69) If there was a ban on guns, people would go out and commit more crimes than they did before. People would steal guns and ammo just they can have it and for the guns they already illegally
There is no reason to completely take away guns from people, criminals will still find a way.
Should There Be Tighter Gun Restrictions in America ? On the twentieth of December, 2012 twenty-six people were shot dead and only two others injured. The gruesome attack occurred in the morning at sandy hook elementary school in Connecticut the perpetrator Adam Lanzo begin this horrific attack by shooting his mother at 9:30am he then took his mother’s rifle and drove to the nearby elementary school where he then began to open fire on first grade students aged just six to seven and shooting any staff members that got in his way. This resulted in the deaths of twenty children and the deaths of six teachers.
Many people have challenged the Second Amendment against the individual rights of the people of the United States; however, the Supreme Court has upheld the Second Amendment rights of individuals against these challenges. All Americans deserve the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment makes it impossible for the government to seize firearms from U.S.
Gun control laws would actively break the terms of the right to self-defense and it would also deny people a sense of safety. According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), guns are used for self-defense two point five million times a year, the police cannot protect everyone all of the time. Fifty one percent of men and fifty six percent of women surveyed by Pew Research said that stricter gun laws would ‘make it more difficult for people to protect their homes and families’ (ProCon.org 3). When people own guns it gives them a sense of safety because they can protect themselves with said
The 2nd amendment, “the right to bear arms”, has been in the news most recently and many believe that since people are dying of guns that guns kill people and now many people think that the 2nd amendment should be banned. The right to bear arms wasn’t just so people could carry a weapon at any time it was made so people had protection, not only for themselves but for their state ( such as a national guard ). Now people are debating that only that the state militia should have guns, but others say that guns provide protection and defense for
Studies proving that the stricter the gun laws are, the more likely there is to be gun-related murders, proving that we are safer with weapons than without. “John R. Lott, Jr., PhD, author of More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, stated, ‘States with the largest increases in gun ownership also have the largest drops in violent crimes... The effect on 'shall-issue ' [concealed gun] laws on these crimes [where two or more people were killed] has been dramatic. When states passed these laws, the number of multiple-victim shootings declined by 84 percent. Deaths from these shootings plummeted on average by 90 percent and injuries by 82 percent.’”
On September 15, 1789, our Bill of Rights was added to the government of the United States of America. One of those rights was the right to keep and bear arms. “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution.) is our 2nd amendment. Some Americans and political parties believe that the 2nd amendment should be taken away because it endangers the lives of Americans.
Equally relevant to the issue of gun control is the protection of the rights given to us by our founding fathers. The Second Amendment forbids the government from “infringing” upon the citizens right to “keep and bear arms,” which the majority of intensified gun control legislation, at either the state or federal level, threatens to take away. Our Supreme Court has already qualified that the Second Amendment gives citizens, not just a collective right, but an individual right as well. Supreme Court decision on the McDonald vs. Chicago case is one such example. Although the Court acknowledged that "the threat that the new Federal Government would destroy the citizens ' militia by taking away their arms was the reason that [the] right…was codified in a written Constitution.
Gun violence is one of the most controversial issues in the United States. On one hand, there are those who believe that stricter controls on the possession and distribution of firearms will reduce gun violence; on the other hand, others believe that stricter gun laws will do more harm than good. There is data that shows the positive effects of gun control in combating gun violence, as well as data that shows the negative effects of gun control in combating gun violence. There are those who think that amending the Second Amendment to fight gun control is not unconstitutional, and there are those who think that the government should keep the second amendment as it is and not change it because doing so would be unconstitutional. The variety
The constitution was written to secure the rights and protect the people, “We The People,” of the United States as our fore-father, the colonist, have fought and declare their independence from Great Britain on July 4th 1776. Great Britain implemented injustice taxes like the Stamp Act to force the colonist to pay for debts they spent for the French Indian War. The constitution was written as a guide for the government to uphold their oath and to protect the rights of its citizens. However, many American today, 2016, believe that the government are progressively stripping many rights from Americans.
Gun control has been a heated debate for several decades, recently, the discussion surrounding this matter has intensified. The argument seems to be divided into liberal and conservative views, thoughts, and values. A majority of liberals desire stricter gun laws, required mental health check-ups, and longer waiting periods when it comes to purchasing a gun. However, the general census among the Republicans is less governmental interference because they feel that there is already too much governmental control involved. The Republican Party often does not want stricter gun laws because the problem at hand is not the gun itself, but the individual wielding the gun.
Gun Control Gun control has become a polarizing and controversial issue around the globe. There have been many reported issues of mass shootings both in schools and in the public, making it a hot button issue. Proponents argue that, if the government strictly controls the ownership of guns, such tragedies can be prevented. Most Americans have an obsession with guns because the law allows them to do so. Therefore, they are always ready to scoff at anyone trying to control gun ownership.
According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment specifically states that “the right of the people to keep
Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.
Without the the Second Amendment, citizens would be without the basic tools needed to protect themselves, their family, and property. The legal use of firearms is the constant factor that holds violent criminals in check. If law abiding citizens did not have the tools necessary to prevent criminals them from committing terrible acts, criminals would be more open and bold in their actions. Self-defense through the Second Amendment, along with its original intent to defend the populace from a tyrannical government, are an important deterrent against crime and tyranny for every citizen of the United