Arguments For Napoleon's Trial

809 Words4 Pages

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury,throughout this trial you will see substantial evidence that the defendant,Napoleon,has violated the laws of this court. He has murdered multiple people ,inflicted severe mental and physical suffering upon others and deprived people of their fundamental rights.The prosecution expects a verdict of guilty and a lengthy prison sentence on this monstrous dictator.

My opponent may say that the defendant is innocent saying he may have not killed anyone with his own hands however article 7(1)(a) states kill is interchangeable with the term “cause of death” which in this case the defendant is guilty of,having to be the one to give out orders and make plans such as the case being with the deceased Boxer. After sending …show more content…

He also declares that any animal that feeds the hens will be killed. After five days, during which nine hens starve to death, the hens give in. He caused the death of at least nine hens, all because of his selfish greed for money.But he didn’t stop there.Napoleon had specifically planned to murder by killing several other animals, for what you may ask? Well the defendant claimed they were so called “traitors”,which in his book means they don’t follow his each and every command.His dogs which he had taken from their mother and raised them to be his own personal killing machines, attacked Boxer and four pigs that had questioned Napoleon. The pigs are bloodied, but luckily Boxer had repealed the attack at the time.After seeing how strong Boxer was Napoleon stopped the attack then commands the pigs to ‘confess”. They confess,and the dogs kill them as traitors to Animal Farm. A series of other animals also confess: all are killed. He brainwashed people who had done nothing wrong to confess to a crime that they did …show more content…

Another reason why the defendant is guilty of crimes against humanity is that he not only is he guilty of crime against humanity 7(1)(a) murder, but he also broken article 7(1)(f) - crime against humanity of torture.The elements of this crime states the convicted inflicted severe physical or mental suffering upon one or more persons- which the defendant showed in “Animal Farm”. Napoleon would work the animals day and night,with little to no food for them to have a healthy body to do the work,instead taking what little food for himself and the pigs who would do no physical work on the farm,not to mention the false promises of a “better farm” and that when they reach a certain age they would have no more work and can freely retire. However in reality he took all their hard work to profit so that he can benefit himself,by drinking and lounging around while the rest of the animals served as his slave ingraining in their brain that “Napoleon is always

Open Document