August 6th and 9th, 1945 were the dates that marked on Japanese’s hearts, and Americans as well.Those were the dates that Japan had an obliteration with in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Japanese soldiers and innocent people of different races were killed grossing over 121,000 deaths.Some people would say it was an excellent idea and some people would it was THE worst idea.There was a discussion, a debate rather on whether or not to resort the use of the atomic bombs.As for me, dribbling the atomic bombs was at least an unjustified decision. Robert Oppenheimer, a scientist, once said “Nobody knows what it’s like unless you’ve experienced it.” For scientists like Oppenheimer and some individuals, opposed to President Harry Truman’s …show more content…
Certain amount of people accused The American government of racism on the grounds that such a device, would never have been used against white civilians.I believed that at that time, Americans could have suffered the responsibility of opening the door to an era of devastation on an unimaginable scale. The atomic bombings in Japan was indeed dreadful for Japanese people. It gave United States the opportunity to bring with it the obligation of restraint and if they were to violate that obligation, Americans’ moral position would be weakened in the eyes of the world and in their own eyes, nevertheless, the decision to drop the atomic bombs was still made. Being a Scientist like Oppenheimer, it made it easier for them to accept change and accept radical change because of their experiences in the pursuit of science. Ordinary people like me, could, not at any time accept the fact that such action was made to a very large group of human beings like me. Robert Oppenheimer “ It would be more difficult for Americans to live up to our responsibility of bringing the unloosened forces of destruction under controlled.” Where is America
Highly, debatable topic President Truman’s decision on dropping atomic bomb on Japan during World war II. Many questions arise when this topic is raised like the world was introduced to the nuclear bombs, it was racist to drop bombs in japan, was Truman’s main target Asian or was it for the political reestablishment between Soviet Union, as German was America’s first attack why he did not drop atom bomb on them and so on. As it has already become more than seventy years it is still amongst the debated ones. It was best decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan by President Truman considering different factors like ending the war as soon as possible, responding to the pearl harbor, to impress the Soviet, lack of having incentives not to use bomb and justify the cost of Manhattan project.
Although it was inhumane and horrific, we were justified in dropping the atomic bombs because American soldiers were being tortured, American bodies were disrespected after death, and the bombs ended the war preventing more American casualties. The first reason that America was justified in dropping the atomic bombs is that American soldiers that were captured in Japan were being tortured. When Japanese soldiers captured American soldiers, they needed some way of trying to get them to give up valuable information because the U.S soldiers wouldn’t just tell them for no reason. So they began torturing them in hopes they’d crack. Document 2 showed the numerous
Miscamble closely follows the steps taken in the Roosevelt administration towards a bomb to help the reader better understand the situation that President Truman inherited. Also, Miscamble emphasizes the roles that other key politicians like Henry Stimson and James Byrnes, played in the dropping of the atomic bombs and their aftermath. Byrnes, who Miscamble is seemingly enamored of, is of special importance to Miscamble’s argument as it was his decision to drop the bomb on a civilian population without prior warning. (NEED CITE PG 43) Of course, this element of the event is the matter of much debate.
Women and children were killed, and entire cities were erased from existence. This clear lack of respect and ethical reasoning highlights that there were more negatives than benefits of the bombs. Document 8 says, “The record of General Macarthur’s operations from 1 March 1944 through 1 May 1945 shows 13,742 US killed compared to 310,165 Japanese killed.” These numbers support the fact that the number of Japanese casualties far exceeded that of America. The decision to drop the atomic bomb added to this total, and made the comparison between American and Japanese deaths even more striking.
After the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Japanese finally surrendered to the allied powers. After the war, the decision of dropping the new destructive weapon was called into question. Many argued that it was unnecessary, and didn’t need to be used, or could have been used differently. Many scientists who worked on the development of the bomb at the Manhattan project claimed that they regretted their work, and even hated that it was used. Many politicians claimed that it was unethical, unproportionate, and unnecessary as the Japanese were about to surrender, and many others claim that the plan to invade would have been a better path to take.
1.0 Introduction World War Two was a long and arduous war which saw the deaths of over fifty-four million people. It was between the Allied and Axis powers but as is often the case in wars, it took its toll on civilians. The American and Japanese were continuing their war well after the war in Europe ceased, and as a result they were running low on supplies and losing troops on both sides. This brought upon a weapon of mass destruction that was used by Harry Truman (the President of the United States at the time), to bring a swift end to the war against Japan. However this decision still has the public divided and debating over the ever timely question; was President Truman justified in his decision to drop the bomb?
Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.
One of the most controversial events from World War II (WWII) was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. On August 6, 1945, America dropped the world’s first atomic bomb, code name “Little Boy, over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The explosion resulted in over 90,000 deaths. August 9th, 1945, a second bomb was dropped, code name “Fat Man”, on Nagasaki, instantly killing an estimated 70,000 people. On August 15, Japan surrendered unconditionally.
Imagine that there is a decision to be made to launch the atomic bomb or not. The bomb was launched but was it justified? Years ago during WWll, a scientist Albert Einstein sent a letter to the president. It said that Germany was creating a bomb that would cause major destruction and the United States had to make one as well. Scientists started making the bomb and it became the Project Manhattan.
In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.
Was America Justified in dropping the atom bomb on Hiroshima in August 1945? On August 6th, 1945 at 8:16 AM, a great yet horrific event in history occurred. This event is known as the dropping of the atom bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan, the event that would begin and end the pain and suffering of millions. The atom bomb was dropped by an American B-29 Superfortress bomber named Enola Gay and
The Bombing of Hiroshima The bombing of Hiroshima was the right thing to do due to the military lives that were going to be lost if the bomb did not get dropped, America also wanted to impress Russia or intimidate them by dropping it and the president saw this opportunity to make japan surrender as well. This all supports the main point on why it was the right thing to do but many to all Japanese say otherwise Lots of soldiers lost their lives because of the conflict with japan, in document B, it states,”123,000 Japanese and Americans killed each other”. Paul Fussell, a WWII soldier also stated, ”war is immoral, war is cruel”. This is speaking for all the soldiers in the war or most of them, this also means that he doesn’t like war and it would
Afterwards, the United States declared war on Japan, and joined allies against the axis powers. The United States’ use of the atomic bombs is justified because it saved American lives; Japan was given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S. The atomic bombs on Japan saved many American lives. Document 15 reads: The entire population of Japan is
President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.
Thesis statement: Though many speculate that the act of dropping the atomic bomb on Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) while not doing so on Europe (Germany and Italy) was racially motivated, racism played little to no role in these bombings. The United States of America and her allies were willing to end World War II at any cost, had the atomic bombs been available they would have been deployed in Europe. In the 1940’s there is no doubt that the United States of America was engulfed by mass anti-Japanese hysteria which inevitably bled over into America’s foreign policy. During this period Japanese people living in both Japan and the United States of America were seen as less that human.