Are 65% of humans unethical beings with the capability of killing someone on command? Based on the findings of Stanley Milgram’s obedience test in 1963, this could be true if someone holding authority persists. In Milgram’s test he had people administer shocks to a “learner” under the guise of a memory experiment, slowly raising the intensity of the shock as the learner continued to make mistakes. Only 35% of these subjects disobeyed the scientist and refused to continue administered shocks, why is this? Lauren Slater, the author of Opening Skinner’s Box: Great Psychological Experiments of the Twentieth Century, spoke to a subject who refused to administer a shock, Joshua, as well as, a subject who complied with the scientist’s commands, Jacob. …show more content…
Societal norms tend to govern the way we dress, act, and mingle with others. You may think you have a strong set of morals and you’d never succumb to the ideal of the masses, but no one came into the experiment believing they’d “kill” a man in a memory test. Brad J. Bushman attempted to uncover the mystery of conformity in his work titled, “Perceived Symbols of Authority and their Influence on Conformity.” Bushman conducted an experiment where men with three different perceived statuses, a blue color worker, businessman, and fireman, told a random subject to give them a dime for the parking meter. Bushman concluded that, “…the dress of the perceived authority not only affects the number of Ss who conform, but also the type of conformity, the type of nonconformity, and the …[cannot read text] request and conformity,” (Bushman 3). He found that uniforms display a distinct social status and despite a fireman having no direct relation to a parking meter (like a police man would) many subjects gave him a dime. Though it was suggested that older people would be less likely to conform due to their awareness of social standing, the study found that younger people were more skeptic of the experimenter. If we consider someone as a person of a higher caliber than ourselves, we are putting them on a pedestal of possible false authority. Yet society will tell us if you wear a Rolex watch and are chauffeured in a limo, you hold some sort of power against us. However, if we are aware of this anomaly should we not be able to resist
In chapter 6 I learned more on how social influence impacts our everyday relations. There are three levels of social influence and they are by conformity, compliance and obedience. The first section talks about conformity, and it is the lowest level because we voluntarily adapt our behavior to match others. Now there are two variations or reasons outlined by the book to conform to those around us and they are “normative social influence,” and “informational social influence”. The former is our response to feel a greater sense of belonging in the group while the second deals more with us trying to be right by sometimes going with what others say to be right too.
Homework: Research Design Analysis and Critique Section C. Critique of Research Design (70%) This critique is on “Behavioural study of obedience” article by Stanley Milgram from Yale University. This article is an extract from the journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378. Milgram conducted an experiment in the year 1961 to study the struggle between obedience behaviour and conscience of a person. Based on his study, he wanted to analyse whether obedience to an authority can be destructive in a laboratory experiment.
This Milgram research on respect to authority figures was a series of cultural science experiments conducted by Yale University scientist Stanley Milgram in 1961. They assessed the willingness of survey participants, men from a different variety of jobs with varying degrees of training, to obey the authority figure who taught them to do acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to think that they were helping an unrelated research, in which they had to distribute electrical shocks to the individual. These fake electrical shocks gradually increased to grades that could have been deadly had they been true. McLeod's article about the Milgram experiment exposed the fact that a high percentage of ordinary people will
Imagine a world where there is a group who decides how people are going to look, act around each other, and perceive different issues and controversies. Now imagine that this represents our world. There is no need to imagine because this is how the world is since the beginning of humankind. For hundreds of years, there has been society pressures on many topics and issues. From race to body image, pressures to be “perfect” in the eyes of a powerful social group is present in any period of time in the Anthropocene Era.
Conformity can be as simple as wearing the newest trend, or as complex as a society learning ideas that may affect their individual freedoms. Some people feel safer when they are the same and cannot be bullied or taken advantage of. Other people however, feel they have to go against conformity as it can drag down society, and limit individuality, which is essential for people to prosper and grow. As seen in both works of Twain and Douglass they emphasized the ideas of conformity. It is easy to give into conformity because it is often what is expected by society.
In today’s society the general attitude towards an individual is conform or be an outcast. It is seen in schools where people who do not fit into specific cliques become outcasts, the weird people. It is seen in the work place as well. People have conformed to standards set by society simply because society has said to do so. Society asks people to change themselves to fit in.
People conform with people they are relatable with. In the article “The Wall Street Journal Under the Influence: How the Group Changes What We Think” Dr. Berger says “Your thoughts are not public but your behaviors are.” Rules of a group change how people act, people are more likely to conform with people who have the same interests. This shows that people who conform usually try to stay in the group because they are with people who they like. In the book Among the Hidden by Margaret Peterson Haddix, Barons are rich people who get more privileges than other people.
Conformity n: action in accord with prevailing social standards, attitudes, practice etc. Shirley Jackson’s The Lottery Disillusionment of Ten O’clock by Wallace Steven both tell a story of conformity being amiss. Recruiting in Jackson's The Lottery for me to believe stoning a villager to death is okay because they call it tradition. Steven’s society adapted into having no imagination. I tried to keep this from being a conformist I agree with Steven and Jackson’s point of conformity being wrong.
In 1955, Solomon Ash published an article “Opinions and Social Pressure” to a popular magazine. The article outlines an experiment conduced by Ash about conformity and how humans act when faced with conformity. Using cards with various length of lines, Solomon gathers 123 college students to question the length of each. Within this experiment, many different variables were in play in order to outline how a certain subject would respond. Although Solomon Ash’s experiment and article may have been effective in a time where racism and sexism were evident, it is viewed as non effective today.
During the 1960’s Stanley Milgram conducted a series of experiments to test how a person reacts to authority. He started these tests in response to World War Two and the reports of the German soldiers who claimed they were “just following orders’ when asked about
People are very impressionable and will do whatever they are told if put in the right situation. Meyers also talk about how he worries about himself and his readers. He worries that if put in a similar situation that he would not know what he would do. I find myself in the same predicament. No one can know what they would do, but Milgram’s experiment, makes me lean towards the possibility that I would be more obedient than I would like to
Conformity, while it comes easily to many, is an unavoidable and dangerous factory mold that people unfit for society are crushed into so they can become another misshapen product of
The American Identity. When one thinks about the American Identity, one would automatically assume the virtues life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are what fulfils this definition. The American identity is defined solely on freedom. The freedom to do and say as one pleases.
People don’t want to be the odd one out and they certainly don’t want to be judged for it. This experiment showed how social pressure from a group could get a person to conform. All in all, the results of the elevator experiment show that conformity can be influenced by an individual’s innate desire to be like everyone
Conformity and the ideas that surround it have many benefits for people because it creates company for others. The opposing side may argue that conformity does not create companionship,but they would be very mistaken,conformity brings people together which allows them and the people surrounding to grow relationships with others. All throughout life kids will learn that “Conformity is part of adolescence, and some of it is normal,” said Ms. Sherman, who prefers the term “peer influence” to “peer pressure.” “It’s how teenagers learn the rules of how to communicate and how to develop relationships. ”(Rabin)