Jesus Rangel
Mrs. Urckfitz
English 3B/D
March 5 2018
Should books be banned?
Administrations in the United States the right away from writers and readers to choose and learn by banning books, I believe that books should not be banned because people have the right to educate themselves. I hope to prove that censorship and banning of certain books goes against individual rights.
I believe the banning of books disenfranchises groups by restricting information and their ability to educate themselves these groups include prisoners and students. This disenfranchisement contributes to the cycle present in many prisons where prisoners are not reformed and continue their lives in a cycle of crime and imprisonment. According to a Supreme
…show more content…
This leaves us with the question why are books being banned? According to the ALA, books are banned or challenged to protect others from “difficult ideas and information.” more specifically parents or guardians find these books inappropriate for containing some or all the following, anti-family views, homosexuality, offensive language and sexually explicit scenes or descriptions. What most schools or organizations that ban these boks fail to see or understand the book as a whole. With these banning's schools take away the right of students to further their own education as well as the right to see the world from different perspectives. Schools by letting the minority of those who adamantly reject the books win fail at their own goal of providing students a wider understanding of the world. This type of censorship impedes progress Schools are encouraging students to think small and to forget about societies problems and say that there is no such thing as gender and sexual inequality or that ethnic minorities are not being discriminated against. These kinds of truths being swept up and forgotten about by the banning books."Literary Censorship in Schools Impedes Progress." "Schools Once again Face Bind Over Censorship Vs. Book
Schools will at times ban certain books due to age restrictions, or will if it doesn't go with the school's intentions. This happens to popular author Stevin King with many of his books being banned from schools. As Mr.King describes” If you are not careful and diligent about defending the right of your children to read, there won't be much left, especially at the junior-high level where kids begin to develop a lively life of the mind, but books about heroic boys who come off the bench to hit home runs in the bottom of the ninth and shy girls with good personalities who finally get that big prom date with the boy of their dreams. Is this what you want for your kids, keeping in mind that controversy and surprise -- sometimes even shock -- are often the whetstones on which young minds are sharpened?” Because of how schools teach and the compulsory subjects you learn, having the opportunity to learn something on your own without the censorship of the school will help students in the long run.
In a nation where freedom of speech is advertised and protected, is it right or even ethical to banned certain books from schools? To be honest, there are two main things that should be taken accounted in, the audience for the book and the books purpose. It's silly it believe that everything can be solved by censorship, but it's even sillier to not take note of parents concerns when it comes to what their children learn at school. Take the book "Their Eyes Were Watching God" by Zora Neale Hurston, a very controversial book about a black woman and her experience of romance. The book has been banned in schools not only in the United States but also in many places around the world, because of parents claiming that the books contains "sexual
If someone can ban a book because they dislike what the book is saying it would therefore be saying their freedom of speech is valued more than the authors. Banning books also disregards the students' rights because the First Amendment allows them to "read and view what they wish" (First Amendment). Failing to let students read books they want makes it seem like their rights aren't protected. Just because we are young, it doesn't mean we need protection from uncomfortable topics such as violence and racism, both reasons some books are
Book banning has become an ignorant and anti-progressive practice, most frequently seen in schools, often in an attempt to ‘protect’ children from certain ideas or concepts they are likely already familiar with.
Malek Farhan Ms. Yang, Pd 1 English 2 3/19/23 The banning of books in high school is a very controversial topic, with some arguing that it is necessary to protect students from harmful content, while others argue that it mainly depends on the age appropriateness of the students and their level of maturity. While there is no denying the fact age appropriateness should be taken into consideration, banning books can limit the different voices and perspectives available to them, Ultimately limiting their ability to engage with complicated issues and develop critical thinking skills. In fact, Banning books restricts intellectual freedom and critical thinking.
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
In our constitution it states we have freedom of speech and press. Books being banned in today 's society shows how suppressive government 's can be. The first amendment states " Congress shall make no law
Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.
At one point in time, over 7,220 books have been challenged to be banned. Though these books have been removed for the safety of children, not all books should be banned for many reasons. These include the fact that banning books is infringing on the First Amendment, keeping children from understanding the real world, and, even though there are many reasons for book banning, not banning books could help a student’s education and can even work against itself. Banning a book from a school or public library could go against a person’s First Amendment of the freedom of press.
Moreover, it takes away a citizen 's first amendment and the right to free speech. Lastly, the series, Harry Potter has inappropriate topics that led it to being banned like magic, sorcery, and witchcraft. Some books are frequently banned in schools because they contain profanity/slurs, and explicit content; however, some people argue that these precisely same books are worth reading because they teach extremely crucial life lessons, and defends the First Amendment. There are multiple reasons why parents are banning books.
You can choose to read a book or not to read a book. If a book is offensive to you then don't read it. There are simple solutions to this problem rather than banning the books. Most books are banned because a group of people find it offensive, but why ban a book if only a small group of people don't agree with what it says, that doesn't mean that everyone hates the book. Some books that are banned are banned for ridiculous reasons.
Every child deserves a proper education. Banned books are depriving students of a well rounded, culturally aware, literary education because of the culture that is discarded, the history that is being withheld, and the education that young people could get through these banned books. The point of history is to learn from it and learn from others mistakes, but how can we do that if we are not allowed to learn it. As teachers shouldn’t you be teaching us how to make judgment calls like understanding that Mark Twain was a racist, but a man of his time and that doesn’t change him being an amazing writer. We cannot learn things such as that if we cannot even read most of Mark Twain’s books.
[21]” (ProCon.org). Banning books in school can create a problem for the teachers that are trying to assign something to the class. With the new addition to the first amendment schools will have the rights to any books. When books are banned the life lessons in the books are also
Books should not be banned because it deprives mature readers of information they might need to know about. Arizona State University says that we need to
“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.