The behavioural approach has one major shortcoming, the two theories represent very different types of leader behaviour, yet both are shown to be effective in management. The most probable reason for this is that other variables, particularly those related to the type of tasks or the characteristics of the work group determine whether certain leadership behaviours will be effective (Reggio,2013). Task orientated leader might be better suited to one situation, whereas a relationship –orientated leader might be better in a different situation. Contingency theories go a step above behavioural theories. It recognizes that there is no one best style of leadership behaviour. Contingency theory is concerned with the ‘fit’ between environmental …show more content…
Fielders’ model states that there is no one best style of leadership. Instead, a leader 's effectiveness is based on the situation. His work suggested that good leadership performance from a task orientated leader occurs in situations giving high and low situational control, whereas relationship-orientated leaders give optimum performance in situations involving moderate control (Hayward, 1996). He believed that the task based leader will focus less on the group than the relationship orientated leader, who will focus more on the group to the expense of the task (Riggio, 2013). To measure the leaders orientation he developed the ‘least preferred co-worker’ (LPC) …show more content…
For the model to apply in the workplace other variables would have to be included (Hayward, 1996). This became apparent when the predictive ability was reviewed, the model showed support in half of the laboratory studies, but rather less in the field studies (Peters, Hartke & Pohlmann, 1985). Another criticism concerns individuals who scored near the middle of the LCP scale. One researcher divided the ratings into high, low, and medium scores and found that the middle LPC-leaders seemed to be effective in a range of situations (Kennedy, 1982). In sum Fiedlers contingency model was on the first detailed theories of leadership. It makes certain predictions about the situations in which certain types of leaders will be effective and has been a straightforward and widely used intervention for improving leader effectiveness (Ayman, Chemers, & Fiedler, 1995)(Riggio,
In groups, the behaviour of highly prototypical members is likely to be attributed to the person’s personality rather than the prototypically of the position occupied (Hogg, 2001). Approving the come up of their new manager requires the team to get to know him. When he finally comes back from travelling and walks into the office, they describe him as being “quiet and conscientious”. Additionally, he never participates in events established after work (golfing, dinner, etc.). Leadership is understood as a process of interpersonal influence towards organizational goals and occurs in mundane work activities (Larsson & Lundholm, 2010).
Different styles of leadership may be more appropriate for certain types of decision-making. 3. Contingency Theory focuses on environment variables and that would determine which style of leadership is suitable for a particular situation. It
The mechanistic structure of the organization in its entirety did not afford Johnson enough autonomy to successfully lead; even though he was the formal leader and staff director, he was still acting under the authority of the welfare director. Fiedler 's Contingency Theory (Fiedler, 1971b, 1978) suggests that leadership effectiveness is a function of the interaction between the leader and the leadership situation. According to this theory, leaders can be characterized on the basis of their scores on the Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) scale, as being either task oriented or person oriented. John Johnson can be labeled as task oriented since he was the one who proposed implementations on making positive changes to enhance the department’s productivity and maintaining the department set goals. Fiedler 's theory also predicts that leaders with a task-oriented leadership style will be more effective in either highly favorable or highly unfavorable leadership situations.
Comparing the theoretical notions of leadership and the observed examples of leadership displayed by Tim Bloomfield, he is an effective leader. His ambition to motivate his workforce is unfortunately hindered by lazy workers, whom would most likely continue to be lazy regardless of leadership. Tim’s ability to communicate is one aspect that makes him a great leader, however, he needs to contactable at all times during business hours. He has put opportunities in place for team building to occur without forcing it upon people and if not for racist members of staff it would be highly effective. Upon analysing the leadership through traits, behaviour and contingency theories the findings above were substantiated.
They refer to Fielder’s contingency theory, path-goal theory, Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership theory, and Vroom and Yetton’s normative decision model. Each theory is distinctive and different from each other. In the case of McDonald’s, it practices each theory to a certain degree. Fieldler’s contingency theory states that in order to maximize work group performance, leaders must be matched to the right leadership situation (Williams, 2007).
Specific mention may be made of three such theories; Fielder’s contingency theory, situational leadership and Path- Goal theory. The Fielder contingency theory suggests that there must be a strong leader- member relationship. A leader
In spite of the fact that’ leadership analysis’ is the art of breaking down a leader into basic psychological components for study and use by academics and practitioners, a sound leadership analyses
Introduction Systems and Contingency theory recognizes that external factors as well as internal factors affect management. The Contingency theory is offered as an alternative to Open Systems theory as the foundation for improved organizational performance, since it can provide more precise conceptual variables. In addition, providing a way of distinguishing between organizations as well as situations faced by organizations (or the same organization over time) is an aspect systems and contingency theory focuses on. Systems theory and contingency theory therefore attempt at providing an understanding of how organizations ought to be structured. The following paper will discuss the systems theory and the contingency theory.
This model states that in this 21st century, it is impossible to rely on one management style to fit all situations (Educational-business-articles.com, 2016). In other words managers and leaders must be flexible, in order to get the best result out of their teams and individuals. In addition, this theory allows management and leadership to be able to identify and accurately diagnose the situation and vary employees’ behavior accordingly to the situation (Yukl and Mahsud, 2010). This will enable management and leadership at CIBCFCIB to select appropriate types of leadership behavior for each type of situation. Moreover, another impact that this theory has on organizational strategy whereby Charismatic leaders at CIBCFCIB can minimize various types of behaviour by increasing competent employees.
This paper will examine the three leadership theories, identify how they apply to my practice, and explore how these theories interact with each other. The Trait Leadership Theory is based on the belief that a person is born with special traits contributing to natural leadership abilities. Studies of famous historical leaders have been used to identify various traits for this theory. Although the list of traits differs from study to study, there are five major traits that are consistent throughout most studies.
Different scholars identified various kinds of leadership styles that affect the job performance, satisfaction and learning and development of subordinates. Warrick, D.D (1981) cited that there are no doubt variables other than a leader’s style that affect employee performance and development but leadership style plays a significant role and not to be underestimated. An awareness of leadership styles and their consequences are very important because it may either facilitate or inhabit skill development. The major theories on leadership are the traits, leadership styles and contingency theories.
According to Bauer and Erdogan (2010), we have Fiedler’s Contingency Theory, Situational Leadership, Path-Goal Theory of Leadership, and Vroom and Yetton’s Normative Decision Model. I will explain three of these theories one-by-one, then discuss their advantages and disadvantages, and then analyze how each fits with my personality traits and leadership method. Fiedler’s Contingency Theory is based upon the LPC scale of a person also known as the Least Preferred Coworker (Bauer & Erdogan, 2010). If you have a high LPC, that means you still think well of even the worst coworker you could imagine. If you have a low LPC, it means that you think that the coworker you would hate would also be a bad person.
If the behavior theory can identify the key determinants of leadership, people can actually train to become a leader. This is the premise of the management development plan. There are many different types of behavioural leadership styles. Each style suggests that the leadership role is based on the leaders’ concern for the people being led and the level of achievement that needs to be
Behavioral leadership theories are explaining distinctive styles that used by effective leaders. Contingency leadership theories are explaining the leadership style that appropriate based on the leader and followers situation. Integrative leadership theories are influencing successfully leaders and followers relationship through combining of the trait, behavioral, and contingency theories The management to the leadership theory paradigm is transform autocratic leadership to new style of leadership. Q3.
According to the book, "individuals who exhibit traits as a leader able to recognize someone who is a leader of leaders does not mean they managed to get each group to achieve its goals. " theories of leadership behaviour suggests that certain people are able to distinguish the behaviour of a leader by himself and not from