Benefits Of The Stanford Prison Experiment
Zimbardo’s “Stanford Prison Experiment” was an experiment that turned into more of a catastrophe for all parties involved. It started out as an experiment to observe whether brutality in prison was due to the guards' predisposition and their “sadistic” personalities or if it was due to the general environment of the prison (Mcleod). Both the guards and the prisoners assumed their roles very quickly and behaved according to their role. It did not take long for the rules of the experiment (no physical abuse) to be broken. It was clear that this power and role of authority went to the guards’ heads and the prisoners adapted to a helpless obedient role.
There were, in fact, some benefits to this experiment. It brought to light the harsh environments in prisons and the brutality and mistreatment that takes place inside of them for people who have no prior knowledge of prisons. It also led into the future implications for a study or experiment such as this one. It caused rules and guidelines to be set in place in order to protect people participating in studies such as this one. The detriments of this experiment were the psychological and physical harm that the prisoners were forced to endure even if it wasn’t long term. They consented to terms of the
…show more content…
While there is some value in the findings of this study, it ultimately was more detrimental than it was beneficial. Some of the value of this study came from what was learned about the ethical guidelines that need to be set in place in experiments and studies. It has also been valuable to learn the necessity of explicit rules in behavior control and the use of punishment over rewards in training agents (Ethics of intervention Stanford prison experiment). While there were things of value learned from this experiment, it would have been better off if this damage could have been avoided altogether and these lessons did not have to be learned the hard
Kyle Patrick Alvarez's 'The Stanford Prison Experiment'
749 Words | 3 PagesIn Kyle Patrick Alvarez’s The Stanford Prison Experiment, 20 college aged boys are selected to play different roles in a simulated prison located within Stanford. This experiment was thought of and carried out by Philip Zimbardo, a professor of psychology. The boys, who were also students at Stanford, were randomly selected to be a guard or a prisoner. The prisoners were taken by real police officers to the Stanford jail. When the experiment started, most of the prisoners thought of the situation as it was intended to be, an experiment.
Randy Gragg
1016 Words | 5 Pagesthem binary through the authority implied by the direct guard inmate relationship. In quiet rage, the purpose of the experiment was to show what an increase in power and status can do to a person. Essentially Zimbardo's power and authority (being the phycologist) led him to overlooking horrible situations and allowing them to take place. In fact, his own experiment even tricked him. Look at all the police brutality and all the violence in the prisons.
Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo
669 Words | 3 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment, carried out by Philip Zimbardo in 1971, revealed the significant influence of social structure on violence and brutality in prisons. This essay will look at how Zimbardo's study revealed a link between the way relationships are structured inside of prisons and the rise of aggressive and abusive conduct. It will also suggest adjustments to the social structure of jails that might lessen violence. It will also include any potential opposition to the reforms and the difficulties in putting them into practice. College students were given roles as guards or convicts at random in Zimbardo's experiment, which involves simulating a prison setting.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment Affects The African American Culture
1613 Words | 7 PagesThey set out to create an experiment where they would become prisoners or prison guards. Zimbardo was interested in investigating further variables which explained human behavior. Researchers wanted to see how participants would survive in the prison environment. In one interview Zimbardo asked the question, if put in a bad place would an individual's goodness triumph? The researchers set up a mock prison where 24 undergraduate students would play the roles of prisoners and prison guards.
Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo
689 Words | 3 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most infamous and controversial psychological experiments to ever take place to this day. In 1971, Phillip Zimbardo created an experiment that tested the changes one endures when they have to adapt in a prison environment and provided an explanation for the dehumanizing effects of the penile system. 24, college-aged, men were chosen to participate in the 2 week long experiment by flipping a coin to decide whether they’re given the role of prisoner or guard. After their roles were determined, they were given uniforms, cells, identification numbers, etc. Little did he know that the results of this experiment would give some of the most ethically challenged results of time.
The Stanford Jail Experiment Summary
989 Words | 4 PagesBefore graduate student, Christina Maslach raised concerns about the environment in the mock prison and the morality of continuing the experiment, Zimbardo, who served as the prison warden, did not take the abusive behavior of the jail guards seriously. In conclusion, in the Stanford prison experiments, a few ethical principles were not adhered to, as prisoners’ human rights were not regarded, putting the participants in possible danger. What should have been different in the Stanford prison experiment?
Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo
876 Words | 4 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted by Phillip Zimbardo at Stanford University in 1971 and was funded by the US Naval Office. The experiment consisted of 24 volunteer college students who were paid $15 a day to serve as guards and prisoners in a simulated prison environment. Prior to the experiment, each volunteer was given a diagnostic interview to eliminate anyone with “psychological problems, medical disabilities, or a history of crime or drug abuse.” The experiment “was intended to measure the effect of role-playing, labeling, and social expectations on behavior over a period of two weeks,” but Zimbardo ended it after six days due to abuse by the guards and the psychological wellbeing of the prisoners. By the second day of the experiment, Zimbardo already noticed behavioral changes in both the guards and prisoners.
The Stanford Prison And The Milgram Experiment
1010 Words | 5 PagesIn the experiment, Zimbardo converted a basement of the Stanford University psychology building into a mock prison and asked 75 applicants to participate. 24 men were chosen to participate and were paid $15 per day. Prisoners were arrested at their own homes, blindfolded, and driven to Stanford University's psychology department, where the deindividuation process began. Within no time the guards and the prisoners began to change. In the video
Summary Of The Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment
1575 Words | 7 PagesThe Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment is an infamous study that caught the eye of the world and has been taught about in universities and classrooms. This experiment was conducted in 1971, when psychologists Philip Zimbardo and researchers initially set out to form an experiment that observed the impact of becoming a prison guard and prisoner. The researchers wanted to know how the participant would react when placed in a prison simulation. This simulation was conducted in the basement of Stanford University’s psychology building.
Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo
751 Words | 4 PagesIn 1971, Philip Zimbardo set out to conduct an experiment to observe behavior as well as obedience. In Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment, many dispute whether it was obedience or merely conforming to their predesigned social roles of guards and prisoners that transpired throughout the experiment. Initially, the experiment was meant to test the roles people play in prison environment; Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards, disposition, or had more to do with the prison environment. This phenomenon has been arguably known to possibly influencing the catastrophic similarities which occurred at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003.The
Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment
810 Words | 4 PagesThis experiment was conducted in Stanford University by Dr. Zimbardo. During this two week long session, Dr. Zimbardo had several volunteers agree to act as prisoners and as prison guards. The prisoners were told to wait in their houses while the guards were to set up the mock prison, a tactic used by Dr. Zimbardo to make them fit into their roles more. The official police apprehended the students assigned to the role of prisoner from their homes, took mug shots, fingerprinted them, and gave them dirty prison uniforms. The guards were given clean guard uniforms, sunglasses, and billy clubs borrowed from the police.
Essay On Stanford Prison Experiment
599 Words | 3 PagesStanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo questioned, “What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph?” (Zimbardo, 1971) In 1971 a psychologist named Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment on the effects prison has on young males with the help of his colleague Stanley Milgram. They wanted to find out if the reports of brutality from guards was due to the way guards treated prisoners or the prison environment.
How Did Philip Zimbardo Conform
1676 Words | 7 PagesThese series of events seemed to bring out the worst in both prisoners and guards. Prisoners were losing all sense of personal identity after being referred to as numbers and not personal names this made them feel less important and they successfully believed it to be true. After six intense days of Phillip Zimbardo’s conforming to social roles experiment a graduate student who was only there to take notes and interview was so shocked by what she saw she demanded the experiment end straight away as it was degrading to watch and degrading for all who took part as Phillip Zimbardo and his team watched the situation descend into chaos she was only the voice that spoke up about how bad the experiment truly
The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not
746 Words | 3 PagesStanford Experiment: Unethical or Not Stanford Prison Experiment is a popular experiment among social science researchers. In 1973, a psychologist named Dr. Philip Zimbardo wants to find out what are the factors that cause reported brutalities among guards in American prisons. His aim was to know whether those reported brutalities were because of the personalities of the guards or the prison environment. However, during the experiment, things get muddled unexpectedly. The experiment became controversial since it violates some ethical standards while doing the research.
Stanford Prison Experiment Literature Review
1129 Words | 5 PagesUnit 1 Written Assignment Literature Review of article on Standard Prison Experiment Introduction This article concerns the Stanford Prison experiment carried out in 1971 at Stanford University. The experiment commenced on August 14, and was stopped after only six days. It is one of the most noted psychological experiments on authority versus subordinates. The studies which emerged from this have been of interest to those in prison and military fields due to its focus on the psychology associated with authority.
More about Benefits Of The Stanford Prison Experiment
Kyle Patrick Alvarez's 'The Stanford Prison Experiment'
749 Words | 3 PagesRandy Gragg
1016 Words | 5 PagesStanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo
669 Words | 3 PagesThe Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment Affects The African American Culture
1613 Words | 7 PagesEffects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo
689 Words | 3 PagesThe Stanford Jail Experiment Summary
989 Words | 4 PagesEffects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo
876 Words | 4 PagesThe Stanford Prison And The Milgram Experiment
1010 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of The Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment
1575 Words | 7 PagesCompare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo
751 Words | 4 PagesCompare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment
810 Words | 4 PagesEssay On Stanford Prison Experiment
599 Words | 3 PagesHow Did Philip Zimbardo Conform
1676 Words | 7 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not
746 Words | 3 PagesStanford Prison Experiment Literature Review
1129 Words | 5 Pages