lets look at each organizations site then The ASPCA is opposed to laws that ban or discriminate against specific dog breeds or breed mixes without regard to the temperament and behavior of individual dogs. [See position statement, Breed-Specific Legislation] http://www.aspca.org/about-us/aspca-policy-and-position-statements/breed-specific-legislation AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ADOPTED BY THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES AUGUST 6-7, 2012 RESOLUTION RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges all state, territorial, and local legislative bodies and governmental agencies to adopt comprehensive breed-neutral dangerous dog/reckless owner laws that ensure due process protections for owners, encourage responsible pet ownership and focus on the behavior of both owner and dog and to repeal any breed specific legislation …show more content…
Thankfully, once research is conducted most community leaders correctly realize that BSL won’t solve the problems they face with dangerous dogs… Read entire text here. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) (click above for direct link to all position statements) Position Statement on Breed-Specific Legislation (excerpt–please visit the link for lengthy background materials, references, sample breed-neutral laws, and discussion) It is, therefore, the ASPCA’s position to oppose any state or local law to regulate or ban dogs based on breed. The ASPCA recognizes that dangerous dogs pose a community problem requiring serious attention. However, in light of the absence of scientific data indicating the efficacy of breed-specific laws, and the unfair and inhumane targeting of responsible pet guardians and their dogs that inevitably results when these laws are enacted, the ASPCA instead favors effective enforcement of a combination of breed-neutral laws that hold reckless dog guardians accountable for their dogs’ aggressive
Breed-Specific Legislation: The True Solution? From movie portrayals to our very own news media, that while people fawn over our furry friends they are still being victims to the fatal act of Breed-Specific Legislation. Breed-Specific Legislation (BSL) is the action in which certain groups and breeds of dogs are being pulled into a river restriction and prohibition, some even leading ultimately to death. Although BSL was introduced as a form of preventing bites and the safety of humans; scientists have proven as a fact that BSL does not at all stop nor decrease injuries and fatalities. This made a rise in attention in the early 1980’s when the number of fatalities and injuries rose from aggression by certain breeds which ultimately became
Originally founded in 1866 by Henry Bergh (ASPCA) this charity has been able to save the precious lives of many animals all because of the generous donations received. There is a wide range of helpful acts this organization covers including rescue missions, providing animals with shelters until finding a loving home, or aiding the production of more animal anti cruelty laws. One quote from a recent rescue mission states “ASPCA responders on ground in Rock Island, Illinois and Davenport, Iowa, assisting authorities with the rescue of 64 dogs after a year long investigation” (ASPCA). This is one rescue of thousands the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals has been active in, and successful. Now when it comes down to making
In the United States twenty-nine states are enforcing breed specific legislation since there is no state level law prohibiting the enforcement of the specific laws. There are four states that prohibit the enforcement of breed specific laws on a state level but some cases have slipped through the cracks of the state law due to being grandfathered in or finding a loophole through home-rule exemption. However, some states have begun enforcing more laws that identify, track, and regulate dangerous dogs not matter what the breed
BSL stands for “Breed-Specific Legislation”, and the only problem with this is that it bases its reasoning off of the looks of the animal. Legislation is beginning to be passed in different parts of the world, that discriminates dogs just because of their looks. There are many different opinions about this and its effectiveness. The main reason that cities and states pass this law is because there are often multiple cases of dog attacks, and BSL is supposed to improve public safety.
I find that this is just not true. Many people do not like dogs and when they admit it, the owners most often attempt to control their pets to avoid further issues. The owners respect the person’s feelings toward their dog, even if they don’t understand it. There is also one fact Farhad overlooked; there is much the same problem with cats. Citizens are
Hounds are made to kill anyone that breaks the law. The government doesn 't care if violence is used, its part of life. “A four inch hollow steel needle plugged down from the proboscis of the Hound to inject massive jolts of morphine and procaine.” (Bradbury 22).
Society as a whole is responsible for the negative ideas and opinions of the breed. The issue with the ban assumptions are made based on the idea of the dogs dangerous instead of facts relating to all
Why I think Iditarod is not animal cruelty. Iditarod dog sled racing is not a form of animal cruelty. Even though people say the dogs are treated horribly they really aren’t . If the dogs are treated badly why in 2014 did the iditarod have 36 vets (For veterinarians, Iditarod is all about the sled dogs).
There is a long list of regulations that need to be meet to obtain a dog such as liability insurance mandatory spay or neuter and muzzled in public. With BSL the government basically controls who can and cannot have a banned
Pet stores often use this licensing to provide a false sense of security to customers, when what it really means is that they do, in fact, get their puppies from puppy mills. “Responsible breeders would never sell to someone they haven't met because they want to screen potential buyers to ensure the puppies are going to good homes.” If you’re looking to buy a purebred dog then I recommend looking in a local shelter first. There are alot of shelter dogs who are purebred. Then, if you don’t find what you’re looking for, do your research and find a trusted breeder that allows you to meet them in person, and the dog.
Many anti-cruelty organizations, such as the ASPCA (American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals), define them as places where profit is given priority over the well being of the dogs. These breeding places are harsh to the dogs and never offer their love to them. Their industries are large and produce millions of dogs every year. They are legal in many states. They are hidden
(AP Regional State Report) Dog fighting is outlawed in all 50 sates, but there are problems preventing it. The ways we could possibly prevent it, get rid of the fighting dog breed, give animal shelters/ breeders ways to look for signs of people that fight dogs and to start making it mandatory for dogs to be chipped. The pit bull is the main dog breed for fighting in the United States.
Dogs are known as being a man’s best friend, but picture this, a dog is currently sitting at the shelter in a cold hard kennel waiting for his/her furrever family to come adopt her. What she doesn’t know is that may never happen, and she will never get to be a man’s best friend because she has overstayed her welcome at the shelter. Those at the shelter now must do something with her so that they can bring another animal in. In many cases these dogs that enter the shelter don’t end up so lucky and being euthanized is the shelters only option. According to Humane for Pets, every year “five in ten dogs are euthanized simply because the shelter has no one to adopt them.”
With the high number of dogs in shelters, citizens should adopt a dog that needs a home rather than purchasing one (BE10). To aid in the number of people going to shelters to adopt, restrictions should be placed on breeders (BE8). For example, there can only be so many breeders in the country who can only breed so many times a year. This will not only lower the issues of overpopulation, health, and unnecessary appearances but will be healthier for the breeding dogs. Plenty of loving dogs that need homes can be found at local shelters, so adopt, don’t
The majority of the population thinks that Animal Cruelty is only as major as physically beating or maiming an animal, but in fact it is much more vast than that. There can be added charges if the abuse is above a certain extent. The charge for animal abuse is a “ Misdemeanor with a fine up to $1000 or imprisonment up to 6 months” and if the abuse goes above a certain extent, then the charge is a “Misdemeanor with a fine up to $1000 or imprisonment up to 6 months, and restitution to the owner of the dog to include replacement, veterinary fees, special supplies and loss of income. There are no exemptions listed”(“AnimalCrueltyLaws” 8). If people were more aware of what exactly Animal Cruelty was then people would think that the punishments for this crime should be more severe.