Title
Canadian history has had a rich tradition of witnessing emigrates arriving to Canada to explore a new way of life and to maintain their cultural identity. Currently the mass emigration of Syrian Muslims continues this legacy that was started in the late 18th century. One of the great mass migrations that Canada witnessed was during the late 18th century, when Catholic Scottish Highlanders emigrated to Prince Edward Island. These Scottish Highlanders left their ancestral highland homes out of desperation, fear of cultural elimination by the English and for new opportunities to maintain their cultural identity. But why did the Scots believe emigrating could solve the elimination of their heritage? Were there any trails, difficulties or
…show more content…
Charles’ army was numbered at 4,000 and the Royal English army, led by Prince William, Duke Cumberland, was estimated at 9,000 men. The highlanders attempted to use the Highland Charge. This tactic was used to imitated and rush the enemy by firing one shot from their muskets and proceed that by a claymore (sword) charged directly into the enemy. In the early stages of the rebellion, this tactic was used to great effect. However Duke Cumberland had studied this tactic and prepared his men for the ensuing charge. Cumberland ordered his men to thrust their bayonets to their left side, into the vulnerable and unprotected side of the Scottish HIghlanders. The Jacobite army, tired and hungry were exhausted from the failed charged and as the casualties amounted, the lines broke and the army began to …show more content…
Poetry from the migration period illustrated the geographical description, story of emigration and cultural transition to maritimes islanders. In the poem, The MacDonald Heritage the tale of the MacDonald Clan was used to describe the political and economical situation in SCotland, the Atlantic passage and PEI. The poem praised the island for it’s ‘beauty without guile’. The poem is unique because it indicates the position the Scots had towards their new home. The peom emcompasses the full transition the Highland Scots had and illustrated their new identity as Scottish islanders, ready to protect their new home;
“In seventy-three the Revolution began and John was called to defend his new land. This led to halifax, far from his home. And ‘twas there Captain John he became...His love for his homeland was demonstrated when, at his call, his clansmen celebrated the Birth of St.Andrew, to all so dear. That in their hearts they would always revere”
In conclusion the emigration of Highland Scots protected their unique culture, traditions and way of life. But in emigrating to Prince Edward Island, the Highland Scots contributed to the establishment of an island culture, identity and regional separation that distinguishes the inhabitants of the island when compared to the other Maritime
After the siege of Charleston, Sir Henry Clinton traveled back to New York leaving Cornwallis in command of the British campaign in North and South Carolina. On the morning of August 16, 1780, General Horatio Gates chose to fight Cornwallis’ force even though just the previous night his men suffered the terribly infectious illness of dysentery. Gates was confident in his American army of around 3,700 soldiers because they outnumbered the British army of around 2,100 troops. The American advantage ended quickly as one thousand American troops were unable to fight due to the illness they suffered the night before.
In the later months of the Revolutionary War, Cornwallis marched the British forces through the backcountry of North Carolina to intercept General Nathaniel Greene and the patriot troops. Soon the Battle of Cowan’s Ford started But General Greene didn’t want a full scale battle so he tricked the british troops with his “fight-and-retreat” tactic. (The fight and retreat tactic is where In the heat and muddle of a battle, the army would pretend to be defeated, exhausted and confused, and would suddenly retreat from the battlefield. This was used partly as a defeat in detail tactic to allow the troops to defeat larger armies by breaking them into smaller groups.)
They also had excellent planning and execution for any British troops that was a prisoner. In 1781 american patriot General Daniel Morgan defeated the british force in the Battle of Cowpens in South Carolina. All of his great victories set the total for winning the american revolutionary war. This part of the war had taken place at Yorktown.
The advantages proved to work, “in little more than an hour betwixt three and four hundred of them were killed, and of the English only two —one of them by our own muskets, as is thought. For the Narragansets beset the fort so close, that not one escaped.” One most famous battles known as the (Battle of Mistick Fort) when John Mason’s and Underhill’s forces, along with the Mohegan and Narragansett tribe marched to mystic, chaos erupted immediately.” One recalled that dead and dying Indians in the fields surrounding Fort Mistic were "so thick in some places that you could hardly pass along." These battles were very bloody due to the number of casualties that occurred during the night of the Mistic massacre, 400 Pequots were killed in less than an hour, which included children and women, some of them were burned due to the allies burning the fort.
Flora Macdonald happily married Allen Macdonald, a distant relative, in 1750, but they would not remain happy for long (Quynn 245). In 1772 Flora wrote to John Mackenzie thanking him for arranging her son’s education and then saying …and repeated friendships shown to me and this family; of which there will soon be no rememberanc in this poor miserable Island, the best of its inhabitance are making ready to follow theire friends to America…and among the rest we are to go, especially as we cannot promise ourselves but poverty and oppression” (Macdonald 1). She then continues to list their misfortunes as well as mention that Allen was ill and incapable of writing this letter. It could not have been easy to leave her homeland, but Flora made
The American troops occupied the right side of the battlefield and the French held the left command by Rochambeau. On September 28, Washington reconnoitered the enemy’s placement on the field and planned his attack. That night Cornwallis’s men deserted their outpost. Cornwallis sent word to Sir Henry Clinton for reinforcements from the British fleets and army. Cornwallis later learned that Clinton’s departure has been delayed, and he would not be receiving the reinforcements he desperately needed.
Throughout the night, outnumbered colonial forces built defensive fortifications in preparation for an imminent attack by the British. Prepared for the worst, Prescott gave his men the famous order: "Don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes. " Historians believe Prescott’s order was given to save ammunition, in an effort to conserve the Americans’ limited supply of ammunition. On June 17, 1775, the British conquered the Americans at the Battle of Bunker Hill in Charlestown.
And at length proceeded on our way to concord which we then learnt was our destination, in order to destroy a magazine of stores there.”. In the Sworn Affidavit by a British Officer named Edward Gould, there was more evidence to support this claim, too. He noted, “...from whence we proceeded to Lexington; on our arrival at that place, we saw a body of provincial troops armed, to the number of about sixty or seventy men; on our approach.”. Both of these selected quotes support the claim. They explain how the British’s departure that day was intended for going to Lexington.
The idea of America’s melting pot opposes Canada’s cultural mosaic. These two metaphors helps in understanding of the differences between Canadian and American societies. They emphasize the different relationships to the various minorities living in the countries. Canada’s identity is different from America’s, because it boasts a cultural mosaic. Canada’s identity has been shaped by our unique history.
In the essay, “Federalism, Nationalism, and Reason”, Pierre Trudeau addresses the history and origins of self-determination and nationalism and its central role in federal statehood, he then discusses the interactions of federalism and nationalism in a Canadian context. Trudeau posits major arguments that will be assessed in this review. First, he postures that that the federal state is driven by self-determination and nationalism, which ultimately makes it unstable due to its foundation in emotionalism rather than reason. Second, Trudeau outlines the historical factors that resulted in the separatist narrative in Quebec and claims that Canadian nationalism cannot combat Quebec’s regional nationalism. Trudeau begins the essay with a historical
General Washington ordered his helper Lafayette to take 8,000 men and block Cornwallis’ way to escape by land. When they set off their way to block Cornwallis’ escape General Washington led 16,000 men. The Patriots and General Washington surrounded Cornwallis’ and his men’s way. The Patriots fought until October 19 1781. Until Cornwallis sent a drummer and a soldier with a white flag where they meant that they surrendered.
By doing this, colonial Canadians assumed that aboriginal cultural and spiritual beliefs were invalid in relation to European beliefs (244). The problem with ridding the First Nations Peoples of their languages, as Williston points out is to “deprive them of the sense of place that has defined them for thousands of years” (245). The private schooling system was an attack on First Nations identities, and their identity is rooted in “a respect for nature and its processes” (245).
Canadian individual identity is questioned often because it is so diverse and means something different to each person in Canada. Although there is not a set identity there are many values and beliefs that are owned by all Canadians. To find out what Canadians identity is, one has to take into account what has affected it. The United States is the biggest influence on Canadian identity. The U.S. culture is very similar to Canadians as we are exposed to it all the time in media sources.
First, Gallagher designs his arguments using a timeline format divided into distinct chronological periods. For example, the book begins with the French arrival from 1604 through 1616 and the establishment of their colonies in Nova Scotia. From there, Faragher goes on to break the years of French habitation into distinct periods up to and including the expulsion of the Acadians and the scattering of the survivors across the Americas. In addition to using periods, Faragher weaves a dual narrative methodology into each separate period. For instance, the methodology addresses the narrative from both a French and a British point of view.
The narrator of the story is a twelve-year-old boy whose candid view of the events allows the reader to appreciate the struggle to maintain an individual identity in the face of a globalized world. When he tells the reason of his and his mother’s adventure to Mel, the manager of the duty free shop, he simply says “I told him we had nowhere to go, that neither the Americans nor the Canadians would let us in” (King 140). Describing such a complex problem in this simple way, he lets the reader appreciate the absurdity of the situation provoked by border regulations. His ingenuity when responding to