Before the American Civil War, we struggled with the concept of slavery based on our economic and moral differences. People who lived in the North believed that slavery should be abolished since they did not grow crops that needed an abundance of slaves. Moreover, they thought that slaves should be treated like all human beings based on the constitution. On the other side, Americans who lived in the South thought slavery should not be abolished as their crops demanded twice as much work than the ones in the North; therefore, they needed much more workers working in their field and that’s where slaves came into view. They also thought that Africans were inferior because of their skin color and origin. These different points of view caused America …show more content…
Auctions occurred in the South where slave owners would come and buy a slave for a certain amount of money. This was a huge profit for the slave owners in the South because each slave contributed an enormous amount of with little cost. “… there were sold 429 men, women and children. The total amount of the sale foots up $303,850.”(Document I). According to this data, the cost of each slave would be 708.28 dollars. Slaves weren’t paid to work in the fields, so the only time a white man would have to spend on a slave is in the auctions. Therefore, this was fairly cheap for slaveowners based on the fact that a slave would devote almost their whole life to harvesting their crops. In addition, an increase in the number of slaves caused a raise in the cotton production of the slave owner. Between 1840 and 1850, cotton production increased from 1,348,000 bales to 2,136,000 bales of cotton and slave numbers increased from 2,875,000 to 3,650,000 (Document A). Slave owners depended on slaves for their economic status. For example, the South relied on cotton because it was essential for trading with countries in Europe like Britain. Without slaves, the South could have ever made such a development in their cotton production. As a result, slaves were crucial to the prosperity of the …show more content…
They believed that slaves were better off with slave owners than in Africa. Moreover, many people in the South deemed that the slaves were saved from misery and starvation when they were forced into America. John C. Calhoun, the vice president of America, stated that it was a “positive good” that the Africans were slaves. “... look at the sick, and the old and infirm slave, on one hand, in the midst of his family and friends, under the kind superintending care of his master and mistress, and compare it with the forlorn and wretched condition of the pauper in the poorhouse…”(Document J). Calhoun states that slaves are well taken care of in illness and health, rather than in the North, where no one cares about the poor whites starving in the street with nowhere to go. On the other hand, the North had contrasting viewpoints about the moral aspect of slavery. They believed that people of all color should be treated equally and with the same respect. William Lloyd Garrison, an abolitionist and journalist, wrote an anti-slavery newspaper called The Liberator. He advocated for the emancipation of all slaves, but did not think they could or would want to assimilate into the American society. Garrison’s motive for his newspaper was, “Let Southern oppressors tremble - let their secret abettors tremble - let their Northern apologists tremble - let all the enemies of the persecuted blacks tremble.”(Document G).
They wanted to keep the slaves alive but not waste a lot of money so they would feed them enough to keep them alive and work (“Southern
The civil war redefined what it meant to be an American because the nation was divided. The civil war redefined to be an American because it changed laws and american’s were also divided over slavery. Nobody ever helped Sojourner Truth get into carriages,over mud puddles or even gives her any best place. Frederick Douglass told others that they would be free when you are twenty-one during the civil war, but he said that he is a slave for life. Paul Revere quotes said On a shadowy something far away,where the river widens to meet the bay,a line of black,that bends and floats on the rising tide,like a bridge of boats so it basically has something to do with the civil war or the fact that he feels bad for the people who are slaves and need help.
Mina Farooqi The era following the close of the Civil War saw a shift in government attitudes away from laissez faire; the government no longer practiced non-interference in the direction of economic affairs, rather initiated policies that shaped the economy. The government initiated the building of private companies including railroad networks, while providing essential loans, subsidies and grants of public land, thus transforming US capitalism. The entire industrial US was the product of a massive public-private partnership in which the government played critical roles. Federal power allowed for the launch of the transcontinental rail project and communication lines, which opened up the vast Western frontier for farming, trade, tourism and
“It is good that war is so horrible or, we might grow to like it”-Robert E, Lee. Lee is saying that Texans didn’t want to go to war, but their willing to do it for their state’s rights. Events that lead up to the war was when Abraham Lincoln got elected because he was anti-slavery President, and he wanted to end slavery in the united states. Texans fought in The Civil War, to protect states rights, Texas secession, and slavery.
Southerners worked on their own little farms, but plantation owners used slaves to help grow cash crops. Such as tobacco, rice, sugarcane, and indigo. During the early 1790s the use of slaves had started to reduce, Europeans were unhappy with the high prices of tobacco and rice. Farmers in the South wanted to expand the amount of land and slaves, so they started looking for fresh fertile soil. In 1850 cotton plantations had stretched from the Atlantic coast to Texas.
The American North and South had their different views on slavery; these differences demonstrate the contrast in their social setting and their treatment of slaves. As you have pointed out, the North Americans entrepreneurial business played a drastic part in how they treated slaves. I agree with your statement on how, “with less field work that needed
In 1833, Great Brittan finally took action to abolish its malevolent tradition of African slavery decades before the United States and did not even need to have a war over the matter. This is because unlike the United States mother Country, England did not start out with slavery so convoluted with the country’s way of life. When Civil War commenced, it started out as a fight to keep the nation intact instead of splitting up but shortly over the course of the war the sense shifted towards the concerns of African American slavery throughout the nation. This war served as the beginning of the turning point in the undisputed favoritism towards slavery in the nation. And because this was only the beginning, a majority of Northerners and Southerners
Intro: The United States ingrained slavery as part of its society since the country first started, and has been a recurring controversial issue throughout American history. In the Declaration of Independence, no one addressed the issue of slavery, fearing opposition and disunity from the South. The founding fathers who wrote the Constitution largely avoided the issue of slavery too (exception of 3/5th compromise). Despite the fact that weak political leadership, state v. federal rights, different economic systems, and westward expansion toward the Pacific created tensions within the country, it is the prevalent and underlying issue of slavery that caused the Civil War. The tensions caused by slavery echo across American history and is the major
The enslavement of Africans and African Americans in Early America created a clear divide between the North and South. The North, primarily opponents of slavery, argued that slavery violated the basic principal of American democracy – respect for fundamental human rights. On the contrary, the South had an aristocratic understanding of democracy. Proponents of slavery also believed that the prosperity, technologies, and innovations that emerged from this institution was essential for American capitalism. Both opponents and proponents of slavery exercised principals of capitalism and democracy to justify their stance.
The need for more slaves after the switch from tobacco to cotton perpetuated an economic battle between the North and the South. Even though the Northern states utilized the raw materials from the South, in trying to deny the South slavery, the North could gain an economic advantage over the Southern States. Between 1774 and 1804, the Northern states abolished slavery. However, the “peculiar institution” remained vital in the South. The “peculiar institution” is a euphemism for slavery and its economic ramifications in the South.
The two out four questions that I choose are to 1.) Discuss the causes of the civil war. Cite as many facts as possible to back up your analysis. And answer 2.) If the enduring vision of America is embodied in the Declaration of Independence's statements about equality and universal rights to justice, liberty, and self-fulfillment, how much progress toward those ideals had blacks and women made by 1877?
Which encompassed everything from lumber operations to urban factories. Slaves were such an integral part of the Southern economy that nearly every industry relied on them. As the economy grew, so too did the complexity of the slaves’ tasks. Slaves were soon operating major equipment and were becoming quite skilled. Such as a slave named Tooler, who operated a chafer and refining forges in the Buffalo Forge.
No matter your stance at the time, one thing became clear: socially, politically and economically, slavery was the fabric of American success and gave birth to the Old South as we know it today. At the center of the entire institution of slavery, and central to its defense, was the economic domination it provided a young country in international markets. In the early 19th century, cotton was a popular commodity and overtook sugar as the main crop produced by slave labor. The production of cotton became the nation’s top priority; America supplied ¾ of the cotton supply to the entire world.
On any sizeable sugar plantation expensive goods and equipment were necessary if it was to produce effectively and therefore it was a substantial investment (Doc 6). Peter Macinnis refers to this need for considerable investment as the first curse of sugar; due to the fact that establishing a sugar plantation was an expensive endeavor only families that already had the means were able to do so (Doc 7). Without slaves the sugar industry would have failed, almost every aspect of the process of manufacturing sugar was done by slaves, as the demand rose so did the number of slaves, but there was a high price to pay if one was to acquire the amount of slaves necessary on a large plantation (Doc
Already opposing slavery in the north, Uncle Tom’s Cabin produced many opposition of slavery in the north. In the south, plantation owners supported the institution by explaining that the slave conditions was better off compared to the northern industry workers. Likewise, defending north’s accusation of unfair treatments, Governor George McDuffie of the south described that the industry laborers lived in crowded communities and often cannot feed themselves with the little salary. In conclusion, the south and north based their positions on the slave