Civil War: The Boston Massacre
In my opinion I think that both sides were at fault, but ultimately it was the fault of the British soldiers. The Townshend acts was a series of acts passed down by the Parliament of Great Britain. However, the colonist did not agree with the acts because it raised revenues in order to pay for government officials. The colonist began a riot, thus resulting in the importation of British troops within Boston. The Boston Massacre happened on March 5th, 1770. The tension between the British soldiers and the colonist in Boston was on the rise. Altercations between the redcoats, British soldiers, and the colonist happened often as a simple disagreement would result in street fights and riots. With so many British troops deployed in Boston, the competition for limited jobs increased resulting in the frustration of colonist who claimed it was unfair because …show more content…
The colonist was angry and the soldiers panicked as they were surrounded by mobs of angered colonist and the sons of liberty. Looking at the situation on the side of the British soldiers, it was safe to say that they were scared and angry because of the sheer amount of colonist who surrounded them. However, this still does not give them the right to open fire among unarmed civilians without authorization. One could argue that their lives were in danger as they were going to be attacked, but I would argue that there could have been other ways to attempt to fix the situation. On the other hand, looking at the side of the colonist mobbing the soldiers and provoking them by throwing stuff at them was not a wise decision either. Even if they were frustrated with the British soldiers invading their town, there was no reason for them to do what they did which ultimately led to the soldiers opening fire out of
Townshend Act Research Paper
172 Words | 1 PagesOn March 5 1770, a street fight occurred between British soldier and a crowd of colonist, assembler at the custom house in Boston and started insulting the British soldier who was guarding the building; Those colonist where protesting because of the occupation of their city by the British troops sent there in Boston to authorize a taxation measure passed by the British parliament and needed American representation, and also call a Townshend Acts. While colonist was protesting outside the building, the British captain and commanding officer Thomas Preston, requested his soldier to settle their bayonets and join the other guar outside the building. The colonists reacted be tossing snowballs and different items at the British regular, and private
How Did The British Use Self Defense In The Boston Massacre
242 Words | 1 PagesI believe that the British soldiers were using self defense in the Boston Massacre. Through witnesses and evidence, it is proved that the British killing the colonists was an act of defending themselves. In exhibit A, the crime scene showed how the colonists threw snowballs filled with rocks and sharp things at the British. I think that the British were only firing their guns back at the colonists to save themselves from being badly hurt. I believe that the British fired their guns at the colonists back without intentions go kill, but only to protect themselves.
What Are The Primary Reasons For The Battle Of Hoxington And Concord
713 Words | 3 PagesThere are many debates that post to the French and Indian War, the colonist progressed a filling emotion of "division" from the Britain Crown and that is why they were more Pro-America and felt hate for the English. This pure emotion quickened right after fighting broke out; but it t’was not the actual justification the colonists rebelled in the first place. The reason the redcoats lost is due to the fact that King George III and Parliament schemed their way into a military stand-off with the thirteen colonies, when a gov’t based solution would've been less expensive in the long run and much more efficient in keeping the loyalty of some American colonists. Had the British gov’t payed attention to some of its prideful members, who taught the art of respect and bring into agreement our English kin in the thirteen colonies," the war could have been out of the question and avoided. This was not situation that played out to be, however, some British Tories didn’t mind.
Web Project On The Boston Massacre
1083 Words | 5 PagesThis act of violence is believed to have escalated from a dispute and fight over a bill for a wig that a British officer was accused of not paying. But tensions had been on the rise since the British had quartered two regiments in Boston in September 1768. The troops were sent because of issue with customs
Battle Of Bunker Hill Essay
559 Words | 3 PagesWhen the British forces were firmly established on the ground at the base of the hill they began to charge. The British thought they could just march to the colonists and scare them away. As the colonists watched the line of redcoats walk towards them they did not get scared and they did not fire. This was said to be when General Prescott gave the famous order, “ Don’t shoot until you see the whites of their eyes”. As soon as the British were close enough the colonists started firing.
Captain Preston Massacre
721 Words | 3 PagesBREAKING NEWS from the colonies, last night on March 5, 1770 at the Customs House an altercation between the British Troops and the colonists began, causing the deaths of 5 colonists. Yet, the colonists are no angels, what was supposed to be a small demonstration against the British turned deadly. The colonists are said to have provoked officers, by throwing stones, snowballs, and sticks at them. The history of the Boston, Massachusetts colonists and the British Troops is not good all. This is because ever since the British Troops were placed in the colony to enforce the Townshend Acts, the colonists have been on edge, but the peace has been kept until now.
Reasons For The Boston Massacre
232 Words | 1 PagesSomeone in the regiment got panicked and started to fire back at the colonists. John Adams has described that the mob of Boston men were a bunch of angry and insolent men toward the troops.. Furthermore, the colonists was yelling, threatening and throwing everything they could find at the British soldiers
Argumentative Essay: The Revolutionary War
685 Words | 3 PagesThe British fought to defend themselves. They had no intentions of getting back at the colonists for their misdeeds. The colonists should also be held accountable for the first shot, because the British didn 't plan ahead to specifically target the colonists. Though, the Colonists purposely targeted the British. I believe
The Stamp Act And The Boston Massacre
763 Words | 4 PagesOn the night March 5th, 1770, the Boston Massacre occurred. It took place during the enforcement of the unpopular taxation by British troops. One of the main reasons why the British troops were there was for the enforcement of taxation of the colonists, for example, The Stamp Act. These acts required Americans to pay a tax on every piece of printed paper they used. The colonists were furious because they had no say in whether the Stamp Act should pass or not.
Justified Riot Met With Bloodshed: The Boston Massacre
1049 Words | 5 PagesThe soldiers were in the wrong for firing upon citizens and killing a few innocent bystanders, but the citizens were in the wrong for causing a riot and attacking the soldiers with sticks, stones, and snowballs. Eric Hinderaker puts it this way, “the shootings triggered a war of words in which truth was the first casualty” (Smith). The reason the Boston Massacre was labeled a massacre is because the first publications of newspaper labeled the altercation a massacre and blaming the British. Samual Adams and Paul Revere used these publications to put a negative shadow on the Coy 3 British and make it look like the British planned the attack. After the dust settled, they
The Boston Massacre: Self-Defense Or Self Defense?
158 Words | 1 Pageshe infamous street fight that took place in Boston, Massachusetts is referred to as The Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770. The riot started when a few young boys began to throw stones and rocks at British soldiers who were guarding the Customs House. The crowd around the boys started to grow larger and larger, and then people from the crowd begun to join the boys, throwing ice at the soldiers and taunting them. The soldiers then fired, killing five colonists.
The Boston Massacre: The Cause Of The American Revolution
764 Words | 4 PagesIf the following events didn’t take place we wouldn’t have America. In my opinion the Boston Massacre was one of the very main causes to why the Road to Revolution took place. The reason I believe this was an important cause because it was, “ the first episode which resulted in the loss of life.” It is stated that, “Four Bostonians were killed when Redcoats fired into an angry mob.”
Essay On The Boston Massacre
558 Words | 3 PagesThe Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops
The Boston Massacre: The Incident On King Street
735 Words | 3 PagesThe Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.
Essay On Intolerable Acts
672 Words | 3 PagesTensions were high in Boston between the British and the Colonists. Between the Boston Massacre in 1770 and the Boston Tea Party in 1773, Britain was very upset with Boston. King George III, the Lord North- led British government and many of the British citizens were very upset and irritated when they found out that the Boston colonists had made “Tea with salt water”. Once the parliament heard of their escapade, they began thinking of a way to insure that there would be no more uprisings in the Massachusetts colony.
More about Civil War: The Boston Massacre
Townshend Act Research Paper
172 Words | 1 PagesHow Did The British Use Self Defense In The Boston Massacre
242 Words | 1 PagesWhat Are The Primary Reasons For The Battle Of Hoxington And Concord
713 Words | 3 PagesWeb Project On The Boston Massacre
1083 Words | 5 PagesBattle Of Bunker Hill Essay
559 Words | 3 PagesCaptain Preston Massacre
721 Words | 3 PagesReasons For The Boston Massacre
232 Words | 1 PagesArgumentative Essay: The Revolutionary War
685 Words | 3 PagesThe Stamp Act And The Boston Massacre
763 Words | 4 PagesJustified Riot Met With Bloodshed: The Boston Massacre
1049 Words | 5 PagesThe Boston Massacre: Self-Defense Or Self Defense?
158 Words | 1 PagesThe Boston Massacre: The Cause Of The American Revolution
764 Words | 4 PagesEssay On The Boston Massacre
558 Words | 3 PagesThe Boston Massacre: The Incident On King Street
735 Words | 3 PagesEssay On Intolerable Acts
672 Words | 3 Pages