The debate over whether or not student-athletes should receive money has been a hot topic recently. College athletes should benefit monetarily for their efforts because of the serious risks involved, the time the athletes put into it, and if the college is making money off these students they should financially benefit from it. Playing college sports is a dream for some kids, but many do not fully comprehend the issues involved in college sports. There is real danger involved with playing any sport, players can get seriously injured. The physical risks involved in sports are extensive. Many athletes have career-ending injuries during college. If that were to happen all their hard work would be for nothing, they would have made no monetary profit from years of training. Some are put into wheel cars for life, or have permanent brain damage. Not only physical issues, but mental issues are result from college sports. Some former athletes have long-term issues like depression, or frustration. One concussion can have big effects on a person. Many athletes acquire multiple concussion during their careers, and that can result in a lifetime of emotional and physical problems. The risks posed in college sports are nothing to take lightly. …show more content…
Some Division 1 athletes put over 40 hours of work into their sports per week. That is more than an average American full time worker. College is already a huge time commitment with classes, but athletes have to go to practice daily. Athletes could not possibly have enough time for it all, receiving a good education takes time and effort. One person only has so much time, so that starts the debate of if athletes are getting a quality education. The main reason for college is the education, but being an athlete, you could not make education a
The debate of whether not college athletes should be paid has been going on for a couple decades now. With college institutions gaining revenue from football bowl games and March Madness in basketball, Dr. Dennis Johnson thinks that “There now is a clamoring for compensating both football and basketball players beyond that of an athletic scholarship” (2012). On the other hand, Dr. John Acquaviva is satisfied with the current college system in which colleges provide athletic scholarships which reward a free college education in return for representing the university’s athletic program (2012). Dr. Johnson then follows up Dr. Aquaviva’s claim with his five selling points for the paying of college athletes and Dr. Aquaviva provides five points
Hala Warda Kristin McGregor English 90R 22 October 2015 Summary and Response#3: “College Athletes Should Be Paid” Ann Kaufmann’s article “College Athletes Should Be Paid” explains that because college football and men’s basketball programs are so profitable, the athletes who play them should be paid. One reason they should be paid is because they spend more time practicing than they study. For example, “college football and basketball players often spend upwards of 50 hours a week during the season at their sport” (452). Another reason is NCAA doesn’t allow players to accept any gifts money from anyone. For instance, the article states that “not surprising, college players are sometimes tempted to take money under the table” (452).
On the other side of the spectrum, some college athletes hold the position that NCAA athletes deserve to be compensated for their respective revenue-generating sports. Kain Colter of the Northwestern football team reflected this view. “between 50-60 hours a week are devoted to football-related activities...there's no way around the fact that football is a ‘job’...we're brought to the university to play
If college athletes were being paid more athletes would remain in school, instead of dropping out for hopes of making it to the professionals (Griffin 17). If the athletes were being paid they’d stay in school and have a “better” look at life. It is not an irrational statement to claim that Division One Athletes should get paid due to time and revenue put into the un iversities. Adolf Hitler once said “Give me an athlete and I’ll give you an army”, this is indeed evident that college athletes should not get paid to play.
Division one College athletes should be paid at least minimum wage, while playing their sport and attending school. Pursuing this further, most division one athletes have been working at their craft since about grade school or even before. While putting in countless hours to perfect their craft they also have to attend school. If you add up the time spent on practice, training and games, it’s estimated that college athletes often "work" the equivalent of full-time hours for the universities they play for. There are over a million other athletes all with the same goal
The film “Schooled” makes many arguments to support the claim that the NCAA is taking advantage of college athletes. One way the NCAA has the ability to control these athletes is by giving these student athletes the title of amateurs. This title of amateur says that the athletes will be playing for the love of the game and not for money. This also means that the athletes will be offered something priceless in exchange for their playing abilities, which is a free education. During this time as an athlete these students are not able to persue any other kind of income since all of their time is taken up by participating in their sport and followed by school.
The time for homework of an athlete is very little time. For example, I am a cross country runner here at College of The Desert, I am up by 5:00 in the morning to leave for practice, I end practice around 7:30, or 8 depending on the workout, I then need to get home and get ready for my next class, and after that my next class, I end up getting home around 9:30pm, and get started on homework, which could take up to a couple of hours, and I go to bed around 2am, and then get some sleep for the next practice, it may not be everyday but it does take a tole on an athlete's body. College football players should be paid for the risks that they put their bodies in, when they are in the game or on the practice field. The college football player, has pads and a helmet, but can be hurt internally. For example, I was in pop warner football when I was younger, and it was the last game of the year before my team
As you continue that sport you are less active participant in your school classes and extracurricular activities so as you continue you will stop showing up then eventually will just fail the class. So what I am saying is that college athletes need to be forced to go to class and get that college degree before they make it pro. I feel like colleges should make the student be forced to set a class schedule and degree before they ever make it to the sports world. Know you can say well college does that but they say they do it
At an NCAA convention in January, a panel of 15 student-athletes and 65 schools in football-driven leagues passed a resolution adding stipends to athlete scholarships to cover all other expenses a full scholarship doesn’t cover (Sherman). Many disagree with this, while others believe we are taking a step in the right direction. The debate on paying college athletes has been ongoing since the early 1900’s (“Point/Counterpoint”). There are many people who say we shouldn’t give student-athletes extra money because a free ride to college is more than enough payment. They say that the universities offer more than an educations: concerts, lecture series by prominent people, on-stage productions, movies, intramural sports, and fitness facilities
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
These students lead to believe that they will be compensated for their abilities with a quality education that will be paid for with scholarship funds. Instead they often find that they participate in a minimal academic program to allow for excessive hours of practice and travel for sports participation. While scholarships may cover the majority of the scholastic financial burden they do not account for the cost of living for an unemployed student athlete. The National Collegiate Athletic Association profits millions of dollars off the skills of it’s players and until recently was not required to share any of this monetary gain with these students. Careful consideration should be given to rulings prohibiting student athletes from receiving financial reimbursement for collegiate play.
Student athletes are constantly in three worlds, between sports, academics, and if they can handle a job than that to. Of course, there is not a real precedent to begin paying a student the same salary as Kobe Bryant; but making sure that they can eat properly should not be an issue for organizations with such huge amounts of revenue. Whether it is to acknowledge their significant contribution to the college or just to ensure that these students leave their college career with something other than a diploma and a “college football injury,” student athletes should be compensated. After all, Americans don’t spend $11 billion a year to watch men in suits make
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.
Colleges are scouting or looking at kids from the age of ten years old. For March Madness (college basketball tournament) a student athlete would miss up to six days of class that they would have to make up later on, due to traveling and having to be with the team. Football player dedicate 43.3 hours of their own life to college sports. Whether it’s going to the weight room, film sessions, or just putting some type of work for the team. It is also more common for athletes who play football or basketball to go pro than in any other college sport.
College athletes already get their education free why should they get paid for playing a sport they love playing. What do you think, should college athletes get paid for playing the sport there in? Well I don’t think so and in this paper I will tell you and give you reasons why they shouldn’t be paid. College athletes are already getting a free education they shouldn’t be allowed to be paid. My topic is why college athletes shouldn’t get paid.