The United States President is considered one of the most influential positions in the world. Similarly, to U.S President, governors also play an important role in functioning of the nation. In Texas, the governor not only represents the 2nd largest state in the United States, but as well as the people that reside in Texas and performs a major responsibility as acting as people’s voice in office. The Texas Governor and the U.S president both have important responsibilities to ensure citizens well-being, but in comparison, each one has their limitations and conflicts. In this assignment, views from both sides, the Texas governor and the United States President, will be taken into account and be analyzed for their characteristics. For each one …show more content…
In order to serve as a U.S president, an individual must fall under the following conditions, (1) he or she must be natural born citizen, (2) have thirty-five years or older, and (3) must have lived in the United States for at least fourteen years. On the other hand, Texas Governor’s qualifications are similar, (1) the individual must be at least thirty-five years, (2) be a U.S citizen, and lastly, (3) have lived in Texas five years before his or her election. While both positions constitute a term of four-years, the Texas Governor term length was originally two-years until 1866, when Texas was first being re-introduced into the United …show more content…
Similar to the president, laws and policies have to be approved by the highest appointed official in order to determine its outcome. The Governor, in which carefully decides to either approve or veto such bill in the last step of the approval process. However, the Texas Governor has limitation in policy approval. In Texas political history, the outline of the government was meant to prevent constant changes based on ambiguity, thus much more steps are required to change or add a bill to the pre-existing laws, as compared to the difficulty the President has. Ultimately, many work arounds have been used to add or remove a bill due to needed additions required, for example, in Texas there has been over 673 proposed amendments, with 491 being approved, unlike The United States Constitution, which has only 27 amendments. A major evaluation of the Texas constitution is needed. The current layout of the Texas Constitution requires frequent changes and additions that only slow down the justice system and consequently, effecting the Texas Governor. If the Governor were to change such specifications in the Constitution, reducing the strict preciseness of it, it can expand each clause, increasing productivity in
The United States Constitutions and Texas Constitutions are similar to each other. Both of them run with a bicameral legislature consisting of House of Representatives and a Senate. In both, members should vote for representatives, and legislative branch makes the laws. The both constitution are similar as they provide for a separation of powers, checks and balance, between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government.
Our Constitution is the fundamental structure of how we are governed. In Texas, we have two coinciding constitutions that form our government, the United States Constitution and the Texas Constitution. These two documents are often very similar but can also vary greatly with many provisions. Even though the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, we can make comparisons and spot differences between subjects like length and rigidity of the constitutions, the executive branch division of power, how government officials are appointed, and … The United States Constitution was written to be a basic outline of government with 7 articles and only 7,500 words including the amendments.
The state government under the Constitution of 1869 and the administration of Governor Edmund Davis set the stage for the adoption of the current Texas constitution. Governor during the Texas Reconstruction time period was Edmund Davis who was a Republican. The government power expanded under the Constitution of 1869 when a new constitution had to be written in accordance with the Reconstruction Acts. This led to less independence for local governments and constrained the peoples say in the government. Edmund Davis was the Republican governor of Texas elected in 1869 and held office until 1873.
In the United States, each of the fifty states has its own state constitution, which includes the basic provisions as the United States Constitution; however, state constitution is relatively more detailed than the national constitution. The purpose of this essay is to analyze and compare the similarities and differences of the state constitution of Missouri and the United States Constitution, emphasizing in three branches of government: legislative branches, executive branches, and judicial branches. First of all, both the state constitution of Missouri and the United States Constitution divide government into three branches in accordance with the concept of separation of powers. However, the compositions of the three branches are different
Bush declared his candidacy for the 1994 Texas gubernatorial election, his campaign focused of four things: welfare reform, crime reduction, tort reform, and education improvement. In the course of his campaign against popular Democratic candidate Governor Ann Richards, he promised to sign a bill allowing Texans to have permits allowing for the procession of concealed guns. During his tenure, Bush used a budget surplus to extend government funding to organizations geared towards educating the youth about the dangers of drug and alcohol abuse. Consequentially, Texas ranked near the bottom in environmental evaluations. During his tenure, however, Texas took a step toward becoming the leading prouder of wind powered electricity in the United States.
A governor is the state’s top executive officeholder and serves a four-year term in the state of Texas, but there is no limit on how many terms a governor wants to serve. The duties of the governor vary throughout the legislative, budgetary, appointive, judicial, and military powers. However, the governor is limited in its powers because of the plural executive structure. First and foremost, the governor’s legislative powers consist of calling special sessions, vetoing bills or passing them, and has a line-item veto power over the state budget. According to Gibson et al., “Texas has one of the strongest veto powers of any other governor” (194).
The Texas legislative process is governed by the Texas constitution as well as the House of Representative and the Senate. Its primary function is to enact laws to provide for the health, welfare, education, environment, and economic and general well-being of the citizens of Texas. It also establishes public policy through the passage of bills and resolutions and proposes amendments to the state constitution, which are then submitted to the voters for approval or disapproval. When a bill is proposed, it must go through the legislative process before it becomes a law. The legislative process is very long and has many steps.
Although Texas government is democratic, the rich and educated make most of the decisions according to Texas politics, 6th Edition. Government-refers to the institutions in which decision are being made that resolve conflicts or allocate benefits and privileges. Institution refers to an ongoing organization that performs certain functions for society. Another report by the National Bureau of Census shows that Texas is in the top 10% of citizens below poverty line. With such wealth inequality in Texas, is no wonder minorities tend to be less involved.
and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both represent the principles of representative democratic government, in which power originated from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement, both provide for two branches of legislature with a House of Representatives and a Senate and both request a system of checks and balances and separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. They also both divide government power between upper and lower levels of government. In the U.S. Constitution the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the counties are subordinate to the state government.
Briefly, in the evolution of the Texas political system, Texas’s history has been through many situations that shaped the political structure in Texas to become to what it is today. Many changes were responsible for the impact in the history of Texas such as the Texas revolution, the Alamo war with Mexico, military reconstruction act in 1867, etc. Before the war with Mexico, one of the most important impact in Texas history was the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836. Texas and Mexico have an escalating tension and is responsible for the new change in the Texas state constitution. For the cause of the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836, Texas begins by declaring its independence in 1836, established the Republic of Texas, and decided to adopt the new constitution.
The framers of the Texas Executive established a system that was designed to check the powers of the government. As opposed to the US Constitution that vested the power of the executive in the president of the nation (Berry, 1385), the Texas Constitution sought to ensure that the state did not have the excess powers. As such, they came up with a plural system where a variety of individuals make up the executive branch of the state (Texas State Government at a Glance). While the governor of the state remains as the highest ranking officials in the state, they hold the least of powers in the plural system.
While the president can veto an entire bill the governor only has the power to veto a part of the bill. Another thing is that the governor cannot form cabinet and the president can. Yet governors still play an important role after all the restrictions. “But despite having fewer resources and more limitations, modern governors can be successful in implementing their priorities and policies.” (Texas Politics-
The Constitution of 1876 was toward the end in the development of a new, restructured and revised constitution in Texas, yet it was not the last attempt to revise the natural law of Texas. Pressure begin to build to change and streamline the Texas Constitution in the late 1960s. By 1969, fifty-six obsolete and out dated provisions were revoked, including a whole article. This called for a more fundamental overhaul and restructuring of the Constitution, which led to an extensive and prolonged process of constitutional revision that began in the 1970s. Efforts during this time were imperative for two reasons: it explained a long-standing concern whether the legislature had the constitutional right to convene as a constitutional convention; and secondly, the Texas Constitutional Revision Commission provided a thorough revision of the state constitution that served as the foundation for a new
Texas Constitution V. Maine Constitution What is a constitution? According to Merriam Webster Dictionary a constitution is a document that describes the system of beliefs and laws by which a country, state or organization is governed. In numerous ways, the Texas and Maine constitution are similar documents.
The state-level of government gives the governor adequate power to make legislation their own, which many do not recognize in the typical executive powers as seen in the presidency. During this legislative game, the executive branch wields more power than the legislative branch through his ability to set the agenda, calling special sessions, proposing the budget, and vetoing legislation when it comes to making new legislation. In terms of legislative capabilities, one the most prominent abilities the governor posses is the power to set the agenda. Setting the agenda is the first step in the legislative game; the governor must decide what policies he wants to put into law.