(a) One factor that determined the outcome of the 1896 election was the fact Cleveland industrialist named Marcus Alonzo Hanna was determined to see McKinley, Republican Candidate, elected; “I love McKinley,” He once said. The Republican platform cleverly straddled the money question but leaned toward hard-money policies. He believed that the free coinage of silver would bring financial ruin to America, in which William J. Bryan’s, Democratic Candidate, “Cross of Gold” speech demanded inflation through the unlimited coinage of silver at the ratio of 16 ounces of silver to 1 of gold, through the market ratio was about 32 to 1. Free silver became almost as much a religious as a financial issue. Using his vast wealth and power, Hanna directed
The two major political party candidates from the election of 1988 is George Bush and Michael Dukakis. The political positions that the candidate George Bush held before seeking presidency was being a vice president for President Ronald Reagan and for Dukakis he was a governor for Massachusetts. The more liberal candidate was Dukakis because he was a democrat and the more conservative was Bush because he was a republican. Dukakis was more challenged by people in his own party during the primary election because the democrats thought that their party would need to win it all also they refused renomination. Since the Democrats had lost the 1984 presidential election, the Democrats in 1985 and 1986 were happy to find a new way to win the presidency.
In 1898, three political parties tried to win the election, the Republicans, the Populists, and the Democrats. Many of the Populists were poor black farmers and sided with Republicans. Though they had their electoral successes in 1894 and 1896, they were defeated by the Democrats in 1898. The Democrats won the 1898 election because they believed in anti-negro domination and attacking the Republicans.
In any election, many factors influence the outcome. The Philadelphia Congressional Election of 1794 was between Federalist Thomas Fitzsimmons and Democratic-Republican John Swanwick. The support from different socio-economic groups was split between the candidates, and multiple variables affected the voters’ opinions. The candidates’ backgrounds, views and opinions on different political issues, and the voters themselves all proved important factors in the election.
Voting Crisis 5 ~ Election of 1876 and the Compromise of 1877 During the crisis regarding the Election of 1876 and the consequent Compromise of 1877, we voted in favor of those who wished to move on, and allow the nation to progress. Those who added to the controversy and disputed the results simply hinder the United States for moving forward as a nation. Thus, we voted in favor of those who supported the newly elected President, Rutherford B. Hayes, along with the Compromise that granted him his seat.
American voters became more influential in presidential elections because of the events that took place during the Jacksonian and Progressive Eras. In the Jacksonian Era, some voting restrictions were removed, voting became more private, the public was more informed about politics, and voters were taken into greater consideration by presidential candidates. In the Progressive Era, better living conditions, the fight against corruption, and other political reforms made it easier for the working class to vote for candidates that they favored. These events gave voters a greater influence in politics and made elections more fair. During the Jacksonian Era, states began to give citizens a larger influence over presidential elections.
The presidential election of 1824 was very significant for America and its people; it was the end of th Republican-Federalist time period but it was the introduction of the Democratic-Republican party. There were four canidates running for president; Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, William Crawford, and Henry Clay. Jackson and Adams were fairly close in the lead of the election, Jackson with 99 votes and Adams with 84 votes. William Crawford and Henry Clay weren't really regarded to go on and becoming president considering they both had less than 50 votes; however, they still included them in the race to be fair. Although Jackson was assumed to win, he did not have the Constitutional requirement for victory, which was the majority of the
The elections of 1800 and 2016 show a similarity in the way each party attacked each other. Many people think that the 2016 presidential election was the worst for mudslinging that there has ever been. However, if we look back to the presidential election of 1800 between Jefferson and Burr, we would see very similar picture. In the 1800’s, the candidates and their political parties would use their influence with the media to spread lies and misinformation about the other candidates, just like they did in the 2016 presidential election. It seems the media of today has definitely chosen sides just like they did in the 1800’s.
The turmoil, upheaval, and controversy of the 2016 Trump election is a significant current event of the modern world, but this landslide election is not the first in America’s history to raise such conflicting opinions. The Revolution of 1800 was another shift in political history that impacted not only the candidates, but majority of the public. The defeat of John Adams to Vice President Thomas Jefferson led to the rise of the Democratic-Republican Party rule and the eventual demise of the Federalist Party. Often in politics, opposing views, scandals, and negative publicity plays a role in the election process, due to this, in both the 2016 election and 1800 election negative criticism from both parties was evident. The 1800 and 2016 elections
After the election, the candidate who won was General Ulysses S. Grant. Therefore the republican party won the presidential election. In total, Ulysses S. Grant had gathered 214 electoral votes, where as Horatio Seymour had only a total of 80 electoral votes. At the time the presidential candidate only needed 214 electoral votes to win the presidency because not all of the 50 states were established at the time. In the year 1868 there was only a total of 294 electoral votes.
In the presidential election of the year 2000, George W. Bush only got 49.7% of the popular votes versus Al Gore having procured 48.4% of the popular votes, but Bush still won the election based on the number of electoral college votes (Bush got 271, and Gore got 266). However, there was a debacle over who got Florida's 25 electoral votes, and that led to the court case Bush vs Gore in which Bush was the victor. Bush and Gore, despite opposing each other during the election, can be compared and contrasted in many ways, including their personal lives, their backgrounds, and their politics. Born on July 6, 1946 in New Haven, Connecticut,
The Constitution of 1876 came from the result of the 1869 destruction Constitution. Edmund Davis a former union general, a Republican associated with the drastic faction of the party had governed under this Constitution. This Constitution had a reduced local government control giving the executive centralized power. What was believed to be a corrupt exorbitant administration led by Davis in everything you maintain this power and control of governor. Davis manipulated the Supreme Court to invalidate the new elected governor Richard Coke.
Ruther B. Hayes, the Republican candidate, and Samuel J. Tilden, the Democrat candidate, were both running for president. The 1876 election was the most controversial election America has ever seen. Millions of African-American lives were crushed by the election of 1876. In order to win the election, Ruther Hayes created the Compromise of 1877 and in return, pulled the soldiers out the South who were there for Reconstruction. Reconstruction means to rebuild the South and introduce them back into society.
The election of 1796, John Adams versus Thomas Jefferson. The former won by only 3 single electoral college votes. In a highly competitive, controversial race filled with fake smiles and harsh glares, those votes made all the difference in the world to these two men and their running mates. Because George Washington refused a second term, political parties took root when election time came around. No one knew that this election in the early stages of Americas development would define the future of the United States of America.
In February 1861, a new government was on the horizon in the United States, known as the Confederate States of America. Composed of seven states from the South, this new government looked to separate from a union that they felt was tipping in power towards those who wanted to threaten the rights of the South, especially slavery. Similarly, in early 1775, colonists were preparing for revolution against a power that they felt oppressed their rights and wanted to take away their liberties. However, the Civil War was a not a complete representation of a second American Revolution. The Civil War was more than an unsatisfied party rebelling against a larger power, but a clash between two vastly different ways of life.
