Passage two of The Boston Massacre is better than Passage one of The Boston Massacre. Passage two has more details about the Boston Massacre than passage one. The way the soldiers and the young men speak is made to understand that it was in an older time instead of just being told. In passage one nothing was really explained but in passage two it was explained better. Passage two is better than passage one.
Passage two has more details than passage one. In passage two said how the young men were rude and ended up with multiple people throwing ice and snowballs at the soldiers. Passage 2 states “The wrongs and insults, which the people had been suffering for many months, now rekindled them into rage. They threw snow-balls and lumps of ice
…show more content…
In passage one you are told the date instead of showing that it was an older time. Passage one states “Boston in 1770 had no street lamps . Monday, March 5th,was a cold and moonlit night.” But in passage two the way it was shown was through the way they speak. Passage two states “ For Heaven's sake, sir,” exclaimed he , “take heed what you do, or here will be bloodshed.” and that was how passage two made it seem older instead of saying it was older.
In passage one nothing was really explained but in passage two it was explained better. In passage two said how the young men were rude and ended up with multiple people throwing ice and snowballs at the soldiers. Passage two states “The young men, being boston boys, felt as if they had a right to walk their own streets, without being accountable to a british red-coat, even though he challenged them in King George's name. They made some rude answer to the sentinel.” “The wrongs and insults, which the people had been suffering for many months, now rekindled them into rage. They threw snow-balls and lumps of ice at the soldiers.As the tumult grew louder, it reached the ears of Captain Preston, the officer of the day.” “ They marched across the street, forcing their way roughly through the crowd, and pricking the towns-people with their bayonets.” But in passage one it states “After striking one of the young
Then the book joins comparing the two important men, Revere and Gage, because they were enemies. After that the book describes the war that broke out and how important everyone who played a part was. Purpose: The book gave a new perspective on the lives of British soldiers. It stated that the soldiers that
Revere segregates the Bostonians and British soldiers on opposing sides to illustrate the oppressed and the oppressor. Viewers constantly dart their eyes between the British and the Bostonians to analyze their contrasting characteristics. Revere excludes all Bostonians’ violence towards the British soldiers to stir up sympathy towards the Bostonians. Observers can see everything clearly to satisfy Revere’s desire of degrading the British reputation. The sharp buildings depict the exact location where the massacre took place.
This is important because Boston Massacre is a significant event that leads to the American Revolutionary War. It’s considered as a turning point of American’s quest to be independent. It helps galvanize the colonists to
In two famous engravings of the Boston Massacre, Engraving of the Boston Massacre by Paul Revere and The Fruits of Arbitrary Power by Henry Pelham, viewers are given different views of the same event through the use of various artistic techniques. If one looks closer at these two engravings, it becomes apparent that there are differences between how two groups, American Colonists and British Troops, are presented as good, evil, or morally ambiguous. Through the use of various artistic techniques such as color, shading, facial expressions, and text, Revere and Pelham were able to achieve two different expressions and opinions of the same massacre. While Pelham’s engraving appears more neutral in tone, Revere’s engraving includes much more emotional appeal and
Lastly, the author wrote, “They made us walk to this new place we are heading in the middle of winter. I do not like these people.” In all of these lines, the words choice gives readers a sense of confusion, as they make them wonder what is going on, where they are, and why these soldiers are took him and his clan. Michael Rutledge did a great job at using diction to create a tone of confusion for his
So what is so special about Passage 2?Passage 2 gives a more effective, clean reasoning for what they’re trying to talk about. This passage gets so realistic in what's going on and everything! It gives us a longer and a more in depth explanation about the Boston Massacre. This passage provides lots of different parts of the Boston Massacre that the first passage doesn’t.
Before the Boston massacre we had the Townshend Acts in 1768. Lord Townshend was in charge of raising revenue in a way that wouldn 't upset the colonist. Which in their eyes will be a external tax rather than an internal tax such as the stamp act. They are going to charge for imported and manufactured goods from Great Britain. Such as paper, paint, glass and led.
Only some snappy history to set the scene: In 1775, the British armed force was in Boston, and the Revolutionary pioneers, the civilian army, and their weapons were hanging out in the wide open around the city. Paul Revere stayed behind to watch out for the British. Longfellow lies somewhat about the certainties yet gets the fundamental format right. Toward the start of the story, Paul and an amigo are making an arrangement to caution the general population about the British leaving the city to assault the progressives.
Literary Analysis: Paul Revere's Ride In the poem “Paul Revere’s Ride,” written by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, describes the night that Paul Revere ( A silversmith and an American patriot ) rode to every middlesex and farm to warn the American leaders that british soldiers were on their way to arrest them and seize their weapons. The poem then goes on and describes that night, but due to historical research, it is found that this poem is not exactly accurate to the night that this historical event occurred as it is described in the poem and also leaves out some other important events that occurred the same night. The poem was not written just to make him a national hero, but also for other reasons.
Halfway there, they were surrounded by British Officers, but eventually got away. Revere got into Lexington, but lost his horse. He found Hancock and Adams in Mr. Clarks house. The letter give a lot more detail about what happened after the team was surrounded by officers. He explains how he fought of the officers, which is different then the poem.
In Paul Revere’s Ride by Mr. David Hackett Fischer in 1994 discusses one of the very important events of American history that is always stays in the darkness of misunderstandings. In this book Fischer demonstrates not only the famous ride of Paul Revere but also successfully describes the action and the adventure packed night of April 18, 1775. In the midway of the book Fischer reveals how the alarm passed by Revere and the circle was completed back to Boston. This book is adventurous, a competition between two men, Revere and chief commander of the British forces, and General Thomas Gage whose characteristics is well explore and represents him as an historical individual. Fischer explores in this book how this single event is influenced by these two men.
There were many disagreements and because of those, many events were the cause of the American Revolution. These events included bloodshed by others, peoples rights weren’t enforced, individuals didn’t receive freedom, and our country was just not yet whole. Despite of the causes of why the road to Revolution took place there were effects afterwards. When American Revolution was over with the The Declaration of Independence came into place, treaties were signed, and the Bill of Rights. Now these effects/events were amazing, it helped our country tremendously.
The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops
The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.
Homer paints even the snow as being harsh and abrasive, thus making the men he compares the snow to also harsh and abrasive. The army is projected