Journalism and novel writing, like so many other artforms, evolves into variant styles. Combining noveling and reporting, Truman Capote wrote In Cold Blood, a nonfiction novel about a gruesome murder of the Clutter family in a quiet Kansas town. Novels are fictitious and journalism is factual, so their juxtapositions creates an entirely new type of literature, the nonfiction novel. Capote uses fact reporting and storytelling together in a purposeful work that challenges conventional journalism and traditional non-fiction book writing. The mixture of facts with semi-fictionalized tales, and colorful details both establishes the nonfiction novel and challenges traditional journalism. A tension arises between reporting and storytelling. Even …show more content…
Through myriad sources, Capote gathers his intelligence. He talks to Alvin Dewey, Dick, and Perry. He intertwines what he learns to make it appear as if he is with the townspeople, the murderers, and the Clutters at every moment in the story. The level of detail can be intriguing to the reader. Unfortunately, details are where the book verges away from reporting to storytelling. Capote assumes an intent when he writes, “It was as though by keeping this room impersonal, by not importing her intimate belongings but leaving them mingled with those of her husband, she lessened the offense of not sharing his quarters” (29). Capote may have gained information from Clutter friends, but Ms. Clutter is very reticent. Capote had no way of knowing why Ms. Clutter left things in Mr. Clutter’s room. Nothing else in the story rationalizes why Mr. Clutter would be offended by Ms. Clutter sleeping in a separate room. He is not trying to outright make elements up, but he does want to add specificity to the story. Capotes saying, “It was as though…” gives him room to hypothesize (29). Speculation is not common among factual reporting, but it does give Capote room to make things up and make this piece of reportage more interesting like a novel. It is true that they slept in separate rooms. Stating just that would be reporting. It is unknown why she left some of her belongings in Mr. Clutter’s room. The merger of facts and unknown …show more content…
For example, Capote gathers information from talking to one of the investigators, Harold Nye. He tells Capote about a conversation with Perry’s old landlord. Capote prefaces the conversation Nye had with him by writing, “She pursed her lips, hung a cigarette between them, but her eyes stayed on Nye” (177). This kind of detail is story-like and paints a vivid picture of the landlady, but it seems too far fetched for Capote to know it happened this way. It is unlikely that Nye wrote down in his journal that the landlady stares at him while smoking a cigarette, and even if he did write that down, it probably is not with the same details Capote wrote it with. This precise detail is at the expense of the journalistic integrity of the book; however, the nonfiction novel is all about making it seem like the author is with the characters at all times. The landlady’s details push a simple conversation between her and the detective from typical reporting to an engaging
In Cold Blood Rhetorical Analysis Essay Although Capote conveys the Clutters as a simple mid western family, his primary purpose was to display how pivotal the Clutters were to the flow and function of Holcomb’s community, therefore; Capote asserts that everything in life is a chain reaction, nothing just affects one individual. Though the Clutters are seen to be a typical mid western family, with their traditional values, hard working spirit as well as with their high standards of class and dignity. They are to Holcomb what an engine is for a car. They are essential for the town to run properly. This practically seen through Nancy, arguably the most upstanding of all of the Clutters.
The concept of financial stability is central in Truman Capote non fiction text, In Cold Blood and is the chief motive for the murders of the clutter family. To begin with, Truman Capote empathizes that Mr. Clutter is a hard worker, takes care of his employees, a strict father, and a self-made man (6). By working very hard Mr. Clutter became the second richest person in Holcomb.
Capote further builds on his development of description through allusion. Further examples are “Andrews averaged fifteen to twenty books a week; his taste encompassed both trash and belles-lettres, and he liked poetry, Robert Frost’s particularly, but he also admired Whitman, Emily Dickinson, and the comic poems of Ogden Nash.” and “... had a good record in the Army, good as anybody; they gave me the Bronze Star. But I never got promoted. After four years, and fighting through the whole goddamn Korean war, I ought to at least to have been made corporal.”
While reading the book In Cold Blood, one would think that the book must be fiction, due to how sinfully evil the murders of the Clutter family were. However, the book is nonfiction and that is what makes the murder of the Clutter family committed by Perry Smith and Dick Hickock so inhuman and immoral. Towards the end of the book Dick Hickock’s last words were “I just wants to say no hard feelings. You people are sending me to a better place than this world ever was.” (Capote.339).
In the book, “In Cold Blood,” Truman Capote takes us through the lives of the murderers and the murdered in the 1959 Clutter family homicide, which transpires in the small town of Holcomb, Kansas. The first chapter, “The Last to See Them Alive,” vividly illustrates the daily activities of the Clutter family—Herbert, Bonnie, Nancy, and Kenyon—and the scheming plot of Dick Hickock and Perry Smith up to point where the family is found tied up, and brutally murdered. In doing so, he depicts the picture-perfect town of Holcomb with “blue skies and desert clear air”(3) whose safety is threatened when “four shotgun blasts that, all told, ended six human lives”(5). Through the eyes of a picture perfect family and criminals with social aspirations, Capote describes the American Dream and introduces his audience to the idea that this ideal was no more than an illusion. Herbert Clutter: the character Capote describes as the epitome of the American Dream.
I’m writing a book on the murder of the Clutter family and had been following the tracks of the killers, Perry and Dick, from even before they arrived in that innocent town,” he explained politely and he neared the door. “Oh, and don’t worry. I won’t use your real name. Good life, Mr.Bell.”
Capotes creates sympathy for Detective Dewey by allowing the reader to think about what it would be like to have family member who is extremely involved in work about the
Truman Capote’s novel, In Cold Blood epitomizes the shifting sentiments related to the murder of the Clutter family which range from terror, to sorrow, to pride, and all mixed emotions in between. Yet through Capote’s particular descriptions about each character, the connection between their feelings and their actions become further clarified. In effect, the readers experience feelings of sympathy for the victims, their friends and family, the investigators, and even the brutal murders of the innocent family. In order to craft this association, Capote employs a pathos appeal to amplify the audience’s ability to sympathize with each and every character.
Contrastingly, the opposite opinion is revealed through the character Alvin Dewey in the book. Capote writes about Dewey’s beliefs on the case: “[The Clutter family] had experienced prolonged terror, they had suffered. And Dewey
How crazy would it be to interview criminals who murdered 4 people in cold blood? Well that’s exactly what Truman Capote did in this chilling book. In the novel In Cold Blood, Truman Capote used different rhetorical strategies to create sympathy and influence the idea that there are always two sides to every story. Some of the mainly used rhetorical strategies throughout the novel were imagery, diction, tone, and pathos. Furthermore, Capote also illustrated sympathetical emotion towards both types of characters, the protagonists and antagonists.
Facts and Fiction: A Manipulation of Language in Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood English is a fascinating and riveting language. Subtle nuances and adjustments can easily change the understanding of a literary work—a technique many authors employ in order to evoke a desired response from their readers. This method is used especially in In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, a literary work which details a true event about the murders of four members of the Clutter family in the small community of Holcomb, Kansas, in 1959. Although Capote’s 1966 book was a bestseller nonfiction and had successfully garnered acclaim for its author, there is still a great deal of confusion about the distinction between the factual and fictional aspects in the book.
Capote demonstrates his purpose through the use of extraordinary syntax. During the introduction of the novel, the sentences are lengthy and structurally complex, in the same manner
The non-fiction novel ‘In Cold Blood’ interestingly begins as a fiction novel would-with the author setting up the scene of the gruesome quadruple murder about to take place, unbeknownst to the victims. Capote describes the isolated flatlands of rural Kansas, and introduces the victims and their killers as if they were the main characters of a fictional murder mystery. What immediately struck me is how Capote uses literary techniques like the simultaneous narration of the lives of the killers and victims, and the fragmented retelling of the story not specifically in the order of events, which makes the story read more like a work of fiction than of pure journalism. As one gets engrossed in the book, it gets easier to forget that the story is based on truth and is not just a fictional story born in Capote’s head. Capote also demonstrates his mastery over the ‘thriller and suspense’ genre, detailing the Clutter family’s everyday lives, emotions and experiences but with progressively higher levels of anticipation as the pages go by, employing versions of the omnipresent phrase, ‘and that was their last’ for dramatic effect.
As they were sleeping in different rooms and avoiding each other it would be difficult for them to be intimate. They used to love cooking but now they entered and left their home at different times, having their meals on their own. So that option was out too. I racked my brains. The woman slept with a small light on by the floor of her bed.
All characters are accused and redeemed of guilt but the murderer is still elusive. Much to the shock of the readers of detective fiction of that time, it turns out that the murderer is the Watson figure, and the narrator, the one person on whose first-person account the reader 's’ entire access to all events depends -- Dr. Sheppard. In a novel that reiterates the significance of confession to unearth the truth, Christie throws the veracity of all confessions contained therein in danger by depicting how easily the readers can be taken in by