In this essay, the movie The Birds by Alfred Hitchcock and short story called “The Birds” by Daphne du Maurier will be compared using their similarities and differences. In the story, a man and his family were being tortured by big flocks with a variety of different birds. The birds come and go quite frequently attacking children and adults. The birds are annoyingly throwing themselves against window and houses. Throughout the story however, the people discover that it may be a form of suicide for the birds. Although du Maurier’s story and Hitchcock’s film portray the same major conflict and theme. The other story elements are very different.
In this paragraph, two comparisons between the story and movie will be made. The first similarity between the two is the fact that the birds are out to attack the humans. In both the movie and the story, birds are always going after the people, swooping down at their heads putting deep cuts into them. The second similarity is is that there is no
…show more content…
The first, obvious, difference between them, is that most of the movie took place in a town or city, not a country or farm like in the story. I definitely liked the story version with the farm much better than the city setting. I felt like it was cleaner and easier to understand whereas the movie’s town setting made it a bit more hectac. Although the city gave the plot more action, I thought, the farm made it more spooky and creepy, which I preferred. The last difference is the fact that the main character in the the movie was a female, when the main character in the story is a male. I strongly feel that the romance between two people in the movie was unnecessary compared to the short story where the family that most of the story is about, is involved much more in the birds, rather than a relationship some couple is trying to maintain or create. In this case, the story was better than the
Hatchet does a better job explaining because it is in order and the movie is not in order. For example, in the movie Brian finds the cave in the middle of the movie and in the book he finds the cave in the beginning of the book. Also, what I liked about the book is it makes sense. In Hatchet it has less special effects and in the movie it has a lot of special effects. In the movie it has a lot of violent parts in it but in the book it only has like one violent effect.
I believe that the movie “A Cry In The Wild” does a better job of telling the story. I believe this because the movie is different. The movie is funnier and Brain does crazy things. Like eating worms and stuff. In the book Brain doesn’t eat worms.
Alfred Hitchcock was a friend of Daphne du Maurier’s father, Sir Gerald du Maurier. The fact that Hitchcock knew father Sir Gerald much better than his daughter Daphne is striking because Hitchcock adapted three of Daphne du Maurier’s works for the screen. Of the 50-odd feature films Hitchcock made, most of which are adaptations of novels, short stories or plays, there is no other writer which Hitchcock adapts more than once, and yet there are three du Maurier adaptations (Sinyard). Hitchcock’s film The Birds is based on the short story with the same name by Daphne du Maurier; there are many striking similarities between the two works yet the meaning behind Hitchcock’s film and du Maurier’s short story could not be more different.
Fear is the enemy of love and fear comes with feeling alone, worthless, and empty inside. Nat, the main character, showed no signs of fear instead he loves his children so much to the point where he would risk his life for them without a doubt. In “The Birds”, Daphne du Maurier uses point of view to show the importance of putting others before ourselves.
In the short story “The Landlady,” by Roald Dahl and the short film, “Tales of the Unexpected” series, Billy Weaver goes to Bath, England where he meets an old landlady. Screenwriters change an author's work because they want to expand their ideas from a book into a movie. In both the story and short film there are many similarities to be found. For example, the story and short film the characters motives are the same.
The first difference that I have immediately noticed is that the story starts out in the middle at Frank’s funeral, but the movie starts out in a field. Another difference in the movie is the absence of Frank's sister, Cathleen and older brother, Steve who we read about in the story. " Next day Steve drove with his wife back to Baltimore where he managed the branch office of a bank, and Cathleen, the middle child, drove with her husband back to Syracuse." (p. 80) Moreover, in both versions the characters have different jobs, for example Matt owns a store in the story.
Gloria Bird VS Sherman Alexie Gloria Bird’s Turtle Lake and Sherman Alexie’s The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven” are two stories written by Native American authors. When reading these two stories, one would not make any type of connection between them. Both are unique in their own way, but if he or she looks a little closer the similarities and differences become clear. To begin, both of the stories are distinct in their own way.
The birds portray the possibility of escape from Portland, which is referred to as a cage by Alex (A cage for birds), “We are in a cage: a bordered cage” (228). Through this foreshadowing is also seen, as both Alex and Lena plan to escape into the Wilds like the birds. In addition, Alex also says to Lena, “The first time I saw you […] I hadn’t been to watch the birds at the border in years. But that’s what you reminded me of […] you were so fast […] Just a flash and then you were gone. Exactly like a bird” (230).
The peacocks become a central point of the narrator’s life. The narrator describes the appearance and attitude of these grand birds in great
Fawzi AlRagheb Professor Xiamara Hohman English 200 April 4th 2016 Smoke Signals vs This is what it means to say Phoenix Arizona Comparison Sherman Alexie, the author of the story “This is what it means to say Phoenix Arizona” and screenplay writer of the movie “Smoke Signals”. The movie was based on the short story and had many adaptive similarities from it but there were also major differences too. The differences were made not to affect the main storyline of Thomas and Victor’s journey but only to make it more pleasant to watch as a motion picture.
Daphne du Maurier’s short story “The Birds” is a piece of fiction that displays many literary elements. This story displays suspense, foreshadowing, and imagery. By using these literary elements du Maurier creates an intense story that leaves the readers wondering what happens next and wanting more. First, foreshadowing is used to reference events that will happen further into the story.
The conflict in both the story and the film is a bird apocalypse-thing
The scene begins to unfolds in their minds. Mr. Wright yanking open the cage door, taking out the bird, and breaking its fragile neck was enough to make Mrs. Wright lash out, and in a heat of passion, kill her husband. As the trifles collect, the women worry that the men will see their findings, and have what they need to prove Mrs. Wright guilty. Though the men believe her to be the murderer, the women are trying their best to hide the evidence that will prove it.
The reader quickly learns that Nat is very resourceful as he knows to go get food from the farm while it is daylight and the birds will not attack. Maurier uses characterization to not only describe Nat, but many other characters throughout the story. As you can see, foreshadowing, imagery, and characterization are just a few of the literary elements that give “The Birds” an intense story line. They help to create an exhilarating tale that keeps the reader engaged and wondering what will happen next. Maurier’s use of these components helped to make the short story into a hit American horror film in 1963.
In the poems “Sympathy” by Paul Laurence Dunbar and “Caged Bird” by Maya Angelou, both portray captive birds that sing. However in “Sympathy”, the bird pleads with god for freedom, whereas in “Caged Bird” the captive bird calls for help from a free bird. In “Sympathy” the bird knows what freedom feels like since there was a time where the bird was once free, but now is trapped. In the first stanza the use of imagery revealed how freedom felt before the bird was caged.