ipl-logo

Controversies Over The Ratification Of The Constitution

260 Words2 Pages

The controversies over the ratification of the Constitution was taxation, too much power to the President, trading, and the lack of Bill of Rights. There were people who agreed to ratify the Constitution the way it is, which were called federalists. Federalists reasoned that Americans should ratify the Constitution because Americans are allowed to ask for additional amendments after they ratify the Constitution. The ability to be able to request additional amendments after supported the Federalist’s point of view because the Anti-federalists may ask for further amendments after which could happen after they ratify the Constitution. However, people also diverged with ratifying the new Constitution and they are called the Anti-federalists.

Show More
Related

  • Discussion Of General Laws Of Government Convention 1 Of 1787

    860 Words  | 4 Pages

    At this point, those that favored a strong in the middle of government, the federalists, were getting the discussion but the federalists still had to come out on top in the approval of the persons in general. They did this with the Federalist papers. These papers had within able to get other to do Arguments 2, written by Madison, Jay, and Hamilton, on why people should give support to make clear again the Constitution by giving an account of how our government will be balanced under the newly offered government system (medical man 8). The Federalist papers helped those who favored a stronger of the nation government get the most near reaction test of the constitution 3. There were many unhappy people with the constitution 3, as they saw that this newly statement of the nation government could freely rule over the people without a Bill of rights (medical man 2).

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    468 Words  | 2 Pages

    When political leaders met in Philadelphia to figure out how they could strengthen the Articles of Confederation they soon realized that they needed to replace the entire thing with the US Constitution. Those that did not support the constitution were became known as the anti-federalist and those that supported it were known as the Federalists. The federalist wrote the Federalists Papers that were published in newspapers trying to gain support for the constitution. Two states, Massachusetts and South Carolina wrote up a resolution list to ratify the Constitution in order to get them to support it. Both states wanted “all Powers not expressly delegated by the aforesaid Constitution to be reserved to the several States to be by them exercised” (Avalon Project, 1788).

    Read More

  • Representation In Spoke Alexander Hamilton

    1997 Words  | 8 Pages

    Early American history consists of many debates amongst the writers of the American Constitution. Mainly due to the fact that the United States was a new territory and citizens had many fears in mind. The controversy over what exactly would be entitled into the document that would become the rule of the land was not nearly unified however, the men all agreed that the Articles of Confederation needed to be abolished by guidelines of better foundation. “Yet they were ‘neither fit for war nor peace,’” Spoke Alexander Hamilton. It was obvious at its surface that the Articles of Confederation were not going to carry out a strong independent nation for generations and generations to come.

    Read More

  • Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    It took the convincing of the Anti-Federalists to explain how the Constitution gave too much power to the central government and did not state the rights and freedoms of the people, therefore lacking a Bill of Rights. The Federalists agreed to a Bill of Rights, and later the Constitution was ratified with nine out of thirteen votes on June 21 of 1788. Soon after the Constitution was ratified, the separation of powers was understood in the United States government. The separation of powers separated each branch of government.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of B. O. R.

    684 Words  | 3 Pages

    Apparently the Anti-Federalists thought that with the Constitution, they wouldn’t have any individual liberties. Unfortunately the Federalists didn’t see the problem with the Constitution. This is where compromise comes in. After the Federalists and Anti-Federalists discussed their ideas, each side gave up something they wanted in order to get something they did want. Finally after a long, long discussion both sides agreed on the amendments for the Bill of Rights.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And Amending The Constitution

    490 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Anti-Federalists were a political group who did not support the Constitution and a

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Versus The Great Compromise

    520 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Constitution was to be ratified by a special ratifying convention instead of the state legislature. The people fought hard for ratification of the Constitution for a long time. Those who supported the ratification were called Federalists, and those who opposed it were called Anti-Federalists. The Federalists went against the Articles of Confederation, whereas the Anti-Federalists supported a House of Representative which consisted of substantive power. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, whom are all Federalists, wrote The Federalist Papers - a series of essays.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay

    827 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

    Read More

  • Key Conflicts In The Constitutional Convention

    1667 Words  | 7 Pages

    Chapter 1.4 and 2 Study Guide After reading chapter 1.4 and chapter 2, please define the following terms and answer the following questions in your own words. Enlightenment-ideas about nature that led to a movement in which philosophers valued reason and scientific methods Great Awakening- a revival of religious feeling in the American colonies during 1730’s-1750 French and Indian War- a conflict in N orth America, lasting from 1754 to 1763, that was a part of a worldwide struggle between France and the transfer of French Canada to Britain Proclamation of 1763- an order in which Britain prohibited its American colonists from settling west of the Appalachian mountains.

    Read More

  • American Citizens Dbq

    74 Words  | 1 Pages

    Not long after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, the American citizens began to disagree about how the United States should operate. They were conflicted about how much power the federal government should possess, as stated in Chapter 10 of History in the Making, which says that “at heart, Federalists and Republicans disagreed about how much power to vest in the central government or, conversely, about how capable the people were in governing

    Read More

  • The Constitution's Ratification Process

    319 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. The Constitution’s ratification process included arguments for and against ratification by Federalists and Anti-Federalists, respectively. Describe and evaluate the arguments expressed by both of these groups. The arguments the Federalists used in support of the ratification of the Constitution include a decrease in strength and authority of the federal government under the currently designated Articles of Confederation (Bardes, Shelly, Schimdt, 2015, pp.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast A Strong State Government

    697 Words  | 3 Pages

    When the Federalists ratified the constitution, it did not go well with the other side, the Anti- Federalist. The ratification of the Constitution really helped the Federalists cause. This change gave more power and much needed power to the federal government, but the Democratic- Republicans didn’t like that. The Anti- Federalists liked the weaker national government because they couldn't abuse powers and they would need the states. They didn’t want to run into the same issues that they ran away from with Great

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Federalist No. 10

    827 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many individuals were curious in to what was going to be changed because the people wanted changed and not another new document. Which was why the people being a little bit shocked because the government was only revising the Articles of Confederation and got a new document called the Constitution. The Federalist papers proclaimed in the newspapers to explain the new Constitution and why it was established the way it was. Although, the Federalist papers were intentionally used as an explanation of the new document it was also to influence, and to praise ratification. Many individuals wanted to keep the powers locals and disagreed on a central government, they also thought the states should be supreme.

    Read More

  • Controversy: The Constitution Today

    106 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Constitution today is used for numerous things in the US government; it is seen as the foundation of our country as it is an answer sheet for right vs wrong, or more so, guilty or not guilty in court. However, this great document of black and white wasn’t unanimously agreed upon by the great figures of America. In fact, the Constitution was highly controversial at the time; ones who proposed and supported the Constitution called themselves the Federalists as ones who were opposing of it were known as the Anti-Federalists. Just as their names are completely opposite, these groups of men had polar opposite ideas.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

    Read More

More about Controversies Over The Ratification Of The Constitution

Open Document