Higher education is important to most people, but there are times where it does not take priority. One major issue talked about by Magdalena Kay in “A New Course” is that teachers are teaching to the state test, and not to teach students knowledge. There are two perspectives in this article: one is from Magdalena Kay, an associate professor of English at the University of Victoria, and the other is Christopher Lasch. Christopher Lasch is a historian and a social critic, who does not have an inside sight into the educational system. Lasch is only able to express the perspective of an outsider, unlike Kay who has an insight because she is in the educational system. One key perspective that this article is missing, that would add a lot to the …show more content…
Higher education is available for most, but many questions are raised by todays woels to whether students are receiving a higher education, and if test scores are becoming more important.
From her position as a college professor in the higher education industry, Kay states that lots of students are going to college to get quality education, and are there to learn certain skills for the job they are interested in, and are studying for (39). On the contrary, Lasch believes “that the desire for more relevant courses often down comes down to a desire for ‘intellectual understanding’ courses, so that relevance functions as a smokescreen concealing the reluctance to work hard” (38). One might wonder who is right in this situation; is Lash telling how it is or is Kay? Brooke Berger in “Don’t Teach to The Test” takes the
…show more content…
Per Kay, Lasch does not have a conclusion to this question. On the other hand, Kay does not believe “this is the sort of issue that lends itself to grand conclusions that make us feel good. Rather it demands a reevaluation of our educational visions followed by the implementation of very specific strategies” (43). This quote is very important to consider not just because of the words, but for the fact that it is stating that right now there does not seem to be a final answer or conclusion on this problem. Yes, this might be one of the biggest challenges that today’s society faces, but as Kay states: “if we have the courage to take on this challenge, then why should we teach students to avoid challenges, difficulties, and occasional failures?” (43). Berger gives some insight on what she thinks is the best way to invest in education. She states that she would reduce and adjust how often the standardize tests are and that parents are the ones that need to get involved in their kids’ lives for their children to succeed. Through this information not only students will see the damage that teaching to the test has done, but also the damage to society. The society needs to understand the importance of challenging a student in their education and not letting a student’s simply go through the phase of higher
The milieu of education has a history of creating hurdles. Education, if it were a live being, would be on life support having last rights preformed on it. Its past should have been a track record leading us into the future, not for man. A very brief look at two Essays from 1940 to present will show how the only thing we can count on in getting an education, will be ourselves. The Blair Reader 8th Edition gives us two essay’s that will establish evidence to show mans' in contempt for creating problems for education.
There is no perfect way of testing; however there are ways that limit the mind’s creativity and ability think freely. Even with this being known, public schools around the country are having to utilize standardized testing in order to place a score to their student’s intelligence. By using this system, the students don’t develop the capability to answer the open ended questions offered in society or real-life situations. These programs aren’t preparing them for life, but rather a multiple choice survey. Programs such as the ACT and SAT are extremely impactful on a student’s future; however students aren’t analyzing the text and formulating a response, but rather deciding what bubble they haven’t chosen in a while.
In the article, The World Might be Better Off Without College for Education, written by Bryan Caplan, explains how people do not apply what they learned in college into their actual jobs. He mainly focuses his argument on people who are deciding if they want to go to college or not because he is expressing if going to college is actually worth the money being spent. Through the use of rhetorical strategies like testimony, statistics, exemplification, and authority they help the audience have a clearer understanding of his argument. Throughout the article Caplan uses testimony to prove to high schoolers that a lot of people do not apply what they learn in college to their jobs.
Following his ideas, he lists multiple misperceptions about a liberal arts education. His first misperception is that a “liberal arts degree is a luxury that most families can no longer afford” (657). He points out that because businesses and industries are looking for people with basic skills needed to perform a certain job, shortcuts are created. This shortcut or as he refers to it as a social experiment, will eventually lead to a dead end. This aspect of his article appeals to emotion and the fear most students have that they will end up in a job that is no longer needed.
Analysis Essay Our job as an author first and foremost, is to grab the reader’s attention. One we have gained attention from the reader, it is important to provide a voice that will prove to be unforgettable. Amongst many of the recent articles read by myself, Mark Edmundson’s, “Education’s Hungry Hearts” has proven to be the most affective. This article demonstrates how education is often misunderstood. Edmundson develops his article in a way that establishes credibility, authoritative testimony, and emotional appeal.
This quote gives a great sense of the way most of the American public feel about standardized testing, especially the two groups who are most affected by it, teachers and students. This huge emphasis on standardized testing over the last fifteen odd years, since the introduction of No Child Left Behind in 2002, has entirely altered the way teachers teach and students learn. There is no doubt that there needs to be a system of assessing students at the end of the school year if the United States plans on moving toward a system of national standards, like Common Core. The current system is ineffective and does not actually assess what students have learned, but rather what they have memorized. For example, when millennials are asked what they learned in high school they are more likely to say “the mitochondria is the power house of the cell” or, instead of actually being able to explain what the mitochondria does.
Opting Out of Standardized Tests Isn’t the Answer In the present era, people talk a lot about education structure and its standards in a region and its effects on various classes of people in that region. It is so because education is the primary thing that decides many facets of life and society. With respect to that, the annual standardized tests taken by school students is known for its importance as it is supposed to measure the progress in meeting national academic standards. One of the articles from New-York Times discusses about the issue of students’ aversion towards taking the standardized tests in the state of New-York because of the test pattern difficulties.
Standardized Tests: Right or Wrong? Diane Ravitch, a historian of education, once said that, “sometimes the most brilliant and intelligent students do not shine in standardized tests because they do not have standardized minds.” These tests have been a part of American education since the mid-1800s(Is the Use), but now, many people are starting to realize that standardized tests are not as convenient as they thought they were. In 2002, the No Child Left Behind Act required all schools in the United States to test students in grades two through twelve annually in reading, math, and science(Is the Use). But since then, the U.S. has dropped from 18th in the world in mathematics to 36th, with a similar change in science as well.
Thank you so much for taking your time out of your very busy days to join us. It is always wonderful to share thoughts with people of your expertise, especially on a subject that affects my everyday life. Education is paramount to achieving success, and living in the modern world. In my school we take several standardized tests that are supposed to measure how much knowledge I’ve retained throughout the year. These exams have changed the way that children are taught, and have made public schools int a limited learning environment.
On the highly esteemed network of HBO, comedian, John Oliver took to his Emmy-nominated show, Last Week Tonight; to discuss the controversial topic of standardized testing. Much like other subjects he discusses on shit late-night television show, the well-established comedian uses his skill of humor as an advantage in his ridiculing of standardized testing and America’s education system. He is able to expose the testing industry by adopting a very blunt and humorous tone in order to convey to his audience why theses exam producers need to find solutions to their controversy. His welcoming and enthusiastic approach helps him gain interest and build a relationship with his viewers. John Oliver’s abundant use of satire, visuals, and modern day references not only attribute to his credibility, but also help develop his argument that the United States’ testing statistics are below average, therefore the true test for the nation’s education system is “convincing everyone it works, or accepting it doesn’t work, and fixing it” (17:10-17:21).
The 21st century has seen an overwhelming emphasis on education and knowledge as these are known to be the driving force of economic growth. On an individual level, the ability to land a decent paying job which will be able to secure one’s future is a widely sought after phenomenon by most graduates. This is supported by Burriesci’s observation that “advanced degrees are measured by their ‘return on investment’.” As such, many pursue education as a means to achieve better career prospects.
Testing At It’s Worst Standardized testing in not as amazing as it is proclaimed to be too all the students and schools around the country in today 's society”Standardized testing has swelled and mutated,like a creature in one of those old horror movies. ”(Kohn 1). The amount of testing that is going on in the united states is some of the highest rating in regards to how much they test and to the degree in which they test.
In the recent decade, there has been an increase in the use of standardized testing in America (Nichols, 2007). The purpose of standardized testing is to overtly uncover a student’s covert knowledge in a subject area. Used effectively, standardized testing can properly assess student knowledge (Popham, 2003). Academic scholars Nichols-Barrer, Place, Dillon, and Gill (2016) compared Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) that determined college readiness. Both assessment systems results showed high academic performance as the primary indicator of college.
They now must teach “the test.” These high stakes tests carry a lot of weight for students and teachers as promotion/retention and performance based salaries are often tied to them. Teaching the actual items on a test is counterproductive for the practical reason that it makes valid inferences about student achievement almost impossible (Bonds, 2008). Technology is ever changing. The technological needs, schools are sometimes struggling to keep up.
In this paper an article “pedagogic voice: student voice in teaching and engagement pedagogies” has been critiqued. It has been observed that as of late, all through the world, a neoliberal reframing of instructive arrangements has offered ascend to an expanding concentrate on estimation and correlation based results for schooling. It is contended by Baroutsis et al (2015) that pedagogic and student voices are imperative in teaching, as they have found a higher contribution with students when the idea is utilised. On the other hand, this worldview of schooling has assisted to contract the visualisation and determinations of training, whilst likewise "taming" as well as confining conceivably imaginative pedagogies through responsibility structures.