Smrithi Dhananjaya
Maddox
USIH
12 April 2018
Sexual harassment is not just a workplace problem; students also face sexual misconduct and unwanted behavior in schools. Laws put in place focus on workplaces rather than classrooms, making it hard for victims to achieve retribution. While sexual harassment impacts both men and women, most of the harassment is appropriately against women. The decision made in Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education forces schools to control sexual harassment in classrooms and is crucial in the fight to increase female opportunity. Administrators do not adequately manage sexual harassment, choosing to ignore the problem instead of controlling it. Moreover, administrators often victim blame, holding the victims
…show more content…
In general, people labeled as victims often feel guilty for being a victim and do not report the offense. In cases of sexual harassment between students, both classmates and administrators often victim blame the female in the situation. Victim blaming claims that women caused the harassment by dressing and acting inappropriately. “[These] judgements create an environment in which it becomes unlikely that the target of harassment will feel justified and supported in claiming her rights” (Chamberlain). However, sexual harassment “is a part of the larger framework of oppression that subordinates females to male in a complex, deeply enculturated patriarchal system of compulsory heterosexuality” (Chamberlain). In a male-dominated society, the oppression against women runs deeps. Women are forced to overcome many adversities in order to continue to progress in society. The decision made in Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education shows that victims should not always be blamed. The perpetrators and the people that allowed the harassment should be punished. The decision helped reinforce the idea of fair judgements being passed without the need to victim blame. The barriers broken down in the fight to end sexual harassment were not possible without the support of a …show more content…
Laws help increase female opportunity by forcing administrators to control sexual harassment in classrooms. The decision made in Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education is crucial in the fight to reduce the disadvantages in education women have to face. While the decision has lessened the prominence of sexual harassment in schools, sexual harassment still occurs inside and outside of the classroom. While the tolerance of unwanted behavior has dropped to a new low, it will take years before sexual harassment is stopped. With the end of sexual harassment, some of the oppression against women can lessen considerably. Only then will women and girls everywhere advance freely in
Before Sandra stepped up, women that presented their case would often be discriminated against, because an all male panel would not be able to understand a woman’s problem. Sandra Day O’Connor stepping up helped women be heard in court because she knew how they felt. Sandra Day O’Connor shined a light on gender discrimination by ruling on discrimination cases and channeling how other people would
As an adult that has went through an educational program every official involved should have known that strip searching an eighth grade girl wasn’t right. I feel that every official involved in the strip search should have been held liable and at least hope that they were terminated by the school district. Implications I feel that this case set certain limitations on strip searches in the school setting. This case set clear guidelines on how an administrator should perform a search and whether or not the areas searched or justifiable for the situation.
Samantha Kubota’s “School Punished Teen Girl for Working Out in Sports Bra in 100-degree Texas Heat, ACLU Say” (2023) tells the story of a young female athlete. A teenage girl who participates in cross country and track at her high school got in trouble for wearing a sports bra during practice in 100-degree heat while her male counterparts were practicing shirtless. Furthermore, since G.H. wore a sports bra, she was denied the award of being the top runner on the girls’ cross-country team; this award would have been crucial for college recruiting and applications. The girl, who identifies by her initials G.H., requested help from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU sent a letter to her high school stating the coaches, District officials, and employees violated the Fourteenth Amendment and Title IX of the Education Amendments by reinforcing a sex-stereotyped dress code and treating the girls’ and boys’ cross-country teams differently.
Jason Dunlap was awarded “employee of the year” four times and has shown remarkable work ethic in his job. His sexual orientation and gender should not and did not impact the work he had accomplished for LaMark Elementary school during his ten years of employment. During this time, the school even recognized him for his outstanding work, regardless of the fact that he is transgender. Undergoing a sex change does not change Jason Dunlap’s work ethic, and therefore is in no way a justification for the intolerance Mr. Dunlap was faced with. This case is about the discriminatory actions of a bigoted school board and faculty.
Book Paper: 37 Words I had the opportunity to read the book “37 Words: Title IX and Fifty Years of Fighting Sex Discrimination,” by Sherry Boschert. In this book, Boschert presents the story of women working in higher education in the 1960s and fighting for gender equity. These women realized that their frustrating experiences at work were not isolated incidents but rather part of a larger system of discrimination against women. Their activism led to the passing of Title IX in 1972, which prohibited discrimination on the basis of gender in all schools receiving federal funding.
After Title IX was passed into law, schools and colleges were required to take action to make sure that they were not engaging in sex discrimination in any area of their operations, including athletics, admissions, and hiring. In cases where people felt they had been discriminated against, the law also established ways for them to make complaints. The passage of Title IX is a significant turning point in the struggle for gender equity in
The US Department of Justice explains that “Title IX protects students from sexual harassment in educational programs or activities operated by recipients of federal funding” (“Title IX”). In order to evaluate the full impact of Title IX on students today, it’s necessary
In effect to conventional educational institutions such as universities, colleges, and secondary and elementary schools, Title IX correspondingly applies to any training program or education operated by a beneficiary of federal financial assistance. Various people have still never heard of Title IX even though it was passed in 1972, and it hold a major effect in our education system. Furthermost of the people who know/heard about Title IX believe that it only applies to sports, but the athletic equality is only 1 of the 10 main areas that is addressed by the law. The areas included are as followed: “Access to Higher Education, Career Education, Education for Pregnant and Parenting Students, Employment, Learning Environment, Math and Science, Sexual Harassment, Standardized Testing and Technology (http://www.titleix.info/).” Though Title IX is a short ruling, the Supreme Court conclusions and direction from the United States Department of Education, have provided a wide space covering sexual violence and sexual harassment.
Based on the numerous examples exhibited each and every day on the field and off the field in America, it is clear Title IX has fallen short of its purpose. The Act states, in part, “No person shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any academic, extracurricular, research, occupational training, or other education program or activity operated by a recipient which receives Federal financial assistance…” (Parameswaran). Therefore, the goals of the bill were to create an atmosphere of equality for men and women.
They tend to seek help in their campus administrators and they do not provide resources, support that will help the victims, instead, they ask blaming questions. The administrator is more interested in what the victim was wearing and how drunk they were. Victim blaming is when a victim of a crime is held responsible or blamed for the harm being committed. These victims are quickly blamed for their offender's actions and live in fear of running into their offender again on campus. Approximately about 88% of women do not report; victim blaming has caused a silent effect in which women are embarrassed by reporting.
Therefore, candidates have to take this issue seriously when campaigning in hoping of winning an election. Despite feminism rightfully on the rise, this event at Columbia University has stemmed a fiery crusade against sexual violence and domestic violence on college campuses around the world, especially in the United
The documentary called The Hunting Grounds, had multiple concepts that relate to sociology. Using a sociological perspective, it was very prevalent to see the ways college campuses use patriarchy and gender stratification to keep women who have been sexually assaulted on campus from disclosing information or even getting help about these issues. Through the discrimination against women at these gender institutions the women formed a Feminist movement to bring awareness and help to the victims on campuses all around the world and to stop the assaults from reoccurring. The Hunting Grounds is a documentary that reveals the untold stories of women on college campuses and how these women have fought to have their voice heard about sexual assault on campuses. Sexual assault and rape on campuses has always been a major problem for colleges all over the world yet very little has been done to protect the students.
Women would usually attribute discrimination to personnel or particular departments but did not view it as an institutional and systemic issue. Rose (2005) states, “ It is important to note that the emergence of political efforts to end sex discrimination emanated not from a large and organized women’s movement but from a small cadre of elites who had firsthand experiences with sex discrimination,” (p. 161). With several testimonies and investigations of sex discrimination in education initiated by this small cadre of elites, political and public awareness of the issue became more prominent. With the passage of Title IX, girls and women were treated not just more equally in higher education, but in other areas as such as athletics, STEM, and pregnancy and
Sexual assault can either be verbal, physical or visual. Joan Van Niekers cited a recent report by the Human Sciences Research Council which revealed that 34% of learners experienced sexual harassment and other 14% were sexually harassed by teachers , therefore this clearly illustrates that sexual assault take place amongst learners in schools is somehow beyond control and happens in many occasions. In this essay, three causes of sexual assault
Sexual harassment and sexual assault are very serious issues happening today in the workplace. Women or men have suffered from unsolicited sexual behaviors that are typically provoked by someone “higher” in position. “Sexual harassment especially has been a fixture in the workplace since women began to work outside their homes” (Fitzgerald, 1993). It is solely the responsibility of the employer to ensure that all employees within are aware and are very cautions of laws, misconduct, and liabilities. Employers must enforce the Policy Prohibiting Discrimination and further extend those laws and guidelines to their employees.