In the case, Kennedy v. Louisiana, Patrick Kennedy was convicted of aggravated assault. Specifically, the raping of his eight-year-old stepdaughter. The capital punishment for rape of a child under twelve years of age in the state of Louisiana was a death sentence. 1 Evidence:
At 9:18 A.M., on March 2, 1998, Patrick Kennedy had called 911. He reported that his stepdaughter, L.H., had been raped. 1
Police had arrived at Kennedy’s home between 9:20 and 9:30 AM. 1
Kennedy made a few phone calls the morning of the rape. One to his employer, sometime before 6:15 AM (stating that he was unable to work that day). The second phone call was to a colleague, asking how to remove blood stains from a white carpet because his daughter had “just
…show more content…
claiming that Kennedy was not the offender, Kennedy was arrested for the crime of rape. While the state had drawn both Kennedy’s backstory and L.H.’s personal experiences, they had came to the conclusion that Kennedy was the obvious offender. One of the reasons for this is due to the fact that Kennedy had made two phone calls, during the morning of the rape. 1 When L.H. had returned home on June 22, 1998, she told her mother for the first time that Kennedy had raped her. Therefore, confirming the previous suspicions of investigators and making the arrest of Kennedy more reliable. 2 The state charged Kennedy with aggravated rape of a child, under La. Stat. 14:42 (West 1997 & Supp. 1998), and sought the death penalty. Although, life in prison was only granted for the time being. 2 The importance of this case is due to the Supreme Court’s landmark decision that held the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause. This does not permit a state to punish the crime of raping a child with the death penalty if the death of the victim was not intended. This resulted in death penalty only being used for crimes against the state, such as espionage or treason. On Kennedy’s appeal, the Supreme Court of Louisiana affirmed. Additionally, he petitioned for a certiorari. This was granted to him, and eventually the U.S. Supreme Court reversed and remanded.
In “Crime and Punishment: The saga of Richie Parker” published in Sports Illustrated, Gary Smith helps to explain just how many people are affected by a single sexual assault case. He does this in a very unique style by giving 12 sections explaining the incident from different points of view and the effects of a single crime. One person affected was Jill Agostino, the sports copy editor for Newsday. Her unnamed colleague had given her a copy of an article he was writing on Richie Parker and called asking if she liked it. Little did he know, stories like his were keeping her up at night, reminding her of the time she was raped nine years earlier.
On Sunday, March 13, 2013, at approximately 1926 hours, I responded to Conyers Police Department, 1194 Scott Street, for a previous Rape incident. I arrived on scene and met with complainant, Victoria Imafidon. Imafidon advised me she was taken advantage of sexually by her pastor at the New Trinity Assemblies. Imafidon stated his name is Emanuel Ayoola Olufowote or Ayoola Michel Kofi Olufowote. Imafidon stated she was sexually in February by Olufowote.
February 24, 2005 Jessica Lunsford was discovered missing from her home by her family, where she shared with her father and her grandparents. John Couey was accused of entering the Lunsford home through an unlocked door around 3 A.M. Went up to Jessica’s room and woke her up and said “Don’t yell or nothing” and had her follow him out and into his domain. During the deposition and video recording of his confession he stated all the he did to her and where he kept her. John Couey stated in his confession that he kept her in his bed and raped here multiple times.
As with the previous trial, the “intent of purpose” comes into effect here. Each person had a slightly different role in acquiring their case, but it still falls under the same offense. They were both charged with sexual assault of a minor, and received due punishment. In conclusion, my experience of
After the assault, it was said the child, who prior to this was in healthy condition, had a failure to thrive and died several months later. He testified that he didn't know Bishop or who she was, but recognize her face and knew that she was the reason for his
Policy Analysis: Megan’s Law Sexual violence, particularly against children, is a significant issue all around the world. In the early 1990’s in the United States, there were multiple well-publicized cases of sexual violence against children. From kidnappings, to rapes, and everything in between, violence was being committed against children and something needed to be done about it. In 1996, Megan’s Law was passed in response to the sexual assault and death of Megan Kanka, a seven-year-old from New Jersey (Corrigan, 2006).
In 1998, when this mother of reported that his rapist had taken a shower with her son which was 11 at that time. Consequently, the University police had no evidence that a crime were commit at that time, how the campus police did admonish taking shower any other children. Nevertheless, a casework got involved and want to meet with Thomas Harmon the police Chief that close the case. (Crandall, W. Parnell, J. & Spillan, J. (2013. pg.
Mr. James Kimball, at 23 years old, was a school bus driver who pursued a 15 year old student he’d known for two years. Eventually their “flirtatious” relationship escalated to a “single-sexual encounter” on or about October 3, 1991. The relationship was brought to light by the parents of the child henceforth urging Mr. Kimball to plead guilty to one count of statutory rape in 1992, where the judge then imposed a withheld judgment with a three year probation. After that, Mr. Kimball was accordingly put on the Sex Offender Registry. Due to the essence of the given facts and case report, the disparity in time from the crime to the present, and the technicality of the psychosexual evaluator’s report, I would not have aired the story on Mr.James Kimball.
Its astounding to believe that children are capable of killing, but that's just the case. Mary Bell was convicted of manslaughter. Also, Jon Venables and Robert Thompson were convicted for murder too. It was classified as: homicide. Well, what is homicide?
Christopher Simmons was a seventeen year old juvenile from Missouri whom in 1993 along with two of his friends, Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer, planned to rob and murder Shirley Crook in her home (Roper v. Simmons, 2004). On the night the crime was to be committed, Tessmer pulled out of the plan, and Simmons and Benjamin would continue on as planned. The two broke into the Ms. Crook’s home, robbed her, tied her up, covered up her eyes, then drove her to a state park and threw her off a bridge. During the trial, evidence, videotaped reenactment and testimony outlining the premeditated plan, allowed for the jury to easily convict Simmons of the crime. Even though Simmons had no previous criminal record and was a minor at the time the crime was committed,
The reason people wanted the death penalty to be deemed unconstitutional was because the way it was being carried out. Under the eighth amendment, it forbids cruel and unusual punishment. The way the death penalty was acting against the eighth amendment was that the death penalty at the time did not have the guidelines that the death penalty has today. The death penalty was being used in an excessive manner. In the Furman v. Georgia case of 1972, Justices were not happy with the death penalty and wanted it abolished in the United States of America.
This brings me back to prop 66. In California “nearly two thousand murders occur annually and only fifteen death sentences are imposed”(prop 66 official voters guide). When the father of Hester Prynne’s child did not commit a murder or rape which those people who committed murder would be sentenced to death. Although prop 66 will bring justice to those families that have suffered great losses it still has it’s drawbacks, prop 66 is poorly written and might sentence innocent lives.
The lethal injection executions illustrates a constitutional violation of the branch 's overreach as described by the 8th amendment due to its cases bring either successful in the execution or providing sufferable pain to death row inmates. One of the current problems in the Judicial branch is the use of lethal injection towards execution sessions. Lethal injection is an injection that is administered for the purpose of euthanasia and capital punishment. There are two methods of lethal injection today, one using a three drug protocol and the 2nd being the large dose of barbiturate. Lethal injection is used for capital punishment as it follows the 8th amendment we have today.
Does the death penalty violate the 8th Amendment? According to the National Constitution Center, the 8th Amendment states “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (“Amendment VIII”). There is no objective answer to this, because the courts never clearly stated that the death penalty is cruel and unusual. I do not agree with any part of the death penalty simply because I believe it is cruel in the sense that it strips man of his “right to life” as declared in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Ringall was so stressed that he began to vomit and cry hysterically” (Clark Prosecutor). Under the current laws at that time sexual assault was illegal. Even if Gacy was mentally ill as the plaintiff argued, he had broken the