Did you know that 1.4 trillion gallons were flushed into San Francisco Bay, in 2008 just to save the Delta Smelt? There have been restrictions on water. For this reason, farmers are not getting enough water to use for their crops. In my opinion, the water should be kept for the farmers to use.
My first point is that the Delta Smelt stopped pumping water for farmers to use. For this reason, crops are drying up with no water. Also, less food is being grown such as vegetables and fruits. If less food is being grown that means that food prices in the grocery stores will increase. If we don’t help the farmers get the water they need our whole environment will not be in good conditions.
Also, consider that people in cities and in towns need water
Water is being overly stored for farms, when a extinction on Salmon is at risk. Farmers can make a new system to preserve water for both growing crops to standards they like, but not killing an ecosystem of Salmon at the same time. For example, they can put in better irrigation to water their crops and land so it doesn’t become dead.
Virginia General Assembly in 1988 enacted “The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act (Bay Act)” as a pivotal component of Virginia 's non-point source management program. The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act led to the development of land use regulations which was adopted in 1989 and were amended in 1991, 2001 and in 2012 as part of the Integration Bill The Bay Act program is designed to improve water quality in the Chesapeake Bay and other waters of the State by necessitating the use of operational land management and land use planning. At the core of the Bay Act is the notion that land can be used and industrialized to curtail adverse impacts on water quality. The first sentence of the Bay Act serves as a theme for the whole decree: "Healthy state and local economies and a healthy Chesapeake Bay are integrally related; balanced economic development and water quality protection are not mutually exclusive." Virginia aimed the Bay Act to improve water quality and still allow sensible development to continue.
Water is the most important resource in the world. Without water, we would not be able to thrive. Water is essential for farming, businesses, and the general public. Florida, Georgia, and Alabama have been in a two-decade long argument over water use because it has been negatively impacting states’ communities. In the article, How the Florida-Georgia Water Fight Could Affect Atlanta, Molly Samuel discusses the water sources that are being fought over and the impacts these water sources have on the communities.
Article of the Week Response “The Wrong Way to Think about California Water” is an argumentative piece of writing that was written by Michael Hiltzik in the Los Angeles Times. This article stresses mostly about the mere fact of how people waste water; especially in California. The major drought is causing people to use more water than we actually need to use normally. We don’t need to use as much water as we do
Bill McEwen does not only use ethos and logos to express and reach out to the reader, but he also uses pathos. With pathos, the author can get into the reader’s mind and make them feel a certain way with his use of words. An example of pathos in the article can be easily shown when McEwen says” The reality is, our federal and state government will spend hundreds of millions-if not billions- of dollars in coming years on a program that will yield a salmon exhibit instead of a substantial fishery”(McEwen 9). McEwen’s use of pathos can be clearly identified in this phrase by looking at the way he states what he is saying. Here, McEwen does not use any facts or famous experts, but he does say this in such a way that the gets the reader really thinking
One of my peers read this quote from the article “Landowners own the resource and have the right to pump water from beneath their land, as long as the water is being put to beneficial use,” and was confused at this because he had never heard of landowners being able to pump water on their land and that there was even a law for that. By examining this quote we learned something new instead of just reading it and continuing on. When I was reading this article I found this quote “In a drought, as the rivers run low, less fresh water reaches the ocean, causing an imbalance of salt water to fresh water in coastal estuaries,” and interpreted this fact that when that imbalance occurs it can have some damages to the ecosystem affecting the local vegetation and wildlife. The fisherman and farmers living near the water are also affected by this imbalance causing harm to their crops and animals. The other person I talked to had a personal experience with one of the quotes, “These farmers braved the elements; they were confronted with Mother Nature.”
In the U.S. hydraulic fracking has been a main source of energy during today’s times, it 's cheap effectiveness makes us think this . People should know how hydraulic fracturing is not as clean and amazing as we think it is. Hydraulic fracking cannot be a sustainable option for America. There are too many faults for it to be upheld in the long run and we cannot depend on it as our main resource of energy forever.
California needs to listen to the people in this town and find another way to preserve this water . Our state is putting these people through a horrible time and this town may not even be suitable for living and people who have lived there for almost 50 to 60 years will have to move out of the house they most likely we would want to be deceased in . They are putting little children trough things adults can 't even handle for a day ! Farming will become obsolete and this town will have to receive packages from other cities or towns just for food or vegetables . In conclusion this is horrible and California should not revoke our privileges and preserve their water a totally
Drought Conditions make food to decrease. The price of foodstuff has been increasing. People cannot pay their taxes or debts. They have to sell their land. People 's burden is increasing.
Ciera Walton Coursework Ploude 1 Irrigation In Yuma Intro “Describe in detail how irrigation changed Yuma/Southern Arizona?” Irrigation has been a cause in Yuma/Southern Arizona because of the heat, low flow, and the dry deserts. This made irrigation very difficult in 1900s because without water we wouldn’t be able to grow our crops throughout the years, this limited many areas and lands as well. It also makes it very hard to contain and carry out water all across the country.
I think it's too late and the big companies have won. Despite that, I do think water should not have been commercialized and turned into a product. However, Mahatma Gandhi said it best: "There is enough water for human need, but not human
All of this pollution is making it hard to keep people safe considering the water is unsafe to drink or even swim in. Factories using the water do not know that the water is
“As the population rises, the world 's water usage will rise. Many areas of the world already suffer from a lack of fresh water,” (Population Control 3). If the world runs out of freshwater, humanity will plunge into chaos. Humanity needs water to survive, and that is a fact. Relationships between countries will be broken apart over disputes for water.
2% of earth’s fresh water is frozen in ice caps; and, only 1% of earth’s fresh water is available to consume. 2. Unfortunately for our planet, supplies of water are running dry at an alarming rate. The world’s population continues to soar; but, that rise in numbers has not been matched by an increase in supplies of fresh water. Let’s talk about what is going on around the world; I will mention to you just a few major cities, and show you how they are dealing with water shortage.
And one of the old solutions for this concern is to increase number of cultivation lands and exploit new fish stocks. But the competition for land from other human activities makes this an increasingly unlikely and costly solution .for example food producers are experiencing grater rivalry for land, water energy and the need to curb the many negative effects of food production on the environment becoming increasingly clear (Tilman et al. ,2001;