Difference Between Transportation Revolution And Louisiana Purchase

1591 Words7 Pages

In the first half of the 180s, changes occurred in the American government as well as in its economy and society. These includes the creation of the two national parties recognized by the States in present day, the Louisiana Purchase and the Transportation Revolution, etc. This period of time is known as the age of democratic growth throughout the United States of America, which was molded and exemplified by two prominent leaders. These are known as the 3rd and 7th president of the US, Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) and Andrew Jackson (1767-1845). Jefferson is considered one of the most relevant Founding Father, who wrote the Declaration of Independence and proceeded to be (thought by many) an outstanding president. In the other hand, Jackson …show more content…

Jefferson worked effectively with Congress, unlike Jackson who had a turbulence relationship with them. Jefferson restored freedom of the press through expiration of the Alien and Sedition Act and drastically cut the federal government, giving more individual self-government. He reduced the national debt about 25%. He purchased the Louisiana territory from France in 1803, known as the Louisiana Purchase, and doubled the size of the United States. Jackson idealized an economy of the small farmers, and by killing the Second Bank of the United States, a private institution that held Federal funds, he put in power the state and local banks. Jefferson also disliked the National Bank, but he let it pass unlike Jackson. Due to this, he helped cause the Panic of 1836, but he still implemented a self-governing sentiment across the states. With the Specie Circular he passed in 1836, he attempted to halt the paper money that created inflation. He also expanded the use of “spoil system”. The export increased by 75% under his leadership and imports by 250%. Also, his actions toward the Nullification Crisis in the South Carolina, which was threatening the Southerners with military intervention, shaped who he was on the eyes of the American citizens. When it came to foreign affairs, Jefferson passed the Embargo Act, which halted the trading with all countries in …show more content…

As democratic, both believed that individual states should have more control over their own governments than the federal government over all the people. Jefferson and Jackson, although they reached a high level in the government, came from different backgrounds affecting their democratic ideology as they came into power. First of all, Jefferson was born into a wealthy family in Virginia, meanwhile Jackson was born far from the capital, in the Waxhaw’s border region in a common man’s family. Jefferson attended the William and Mary College, meanwhile Jackson went to “Old-school” field. This was the base for their belief of common man: Jefferson engaged with the idea that the common man, the individual farmers and the small agrarians groups were the spine of the economy, contrary to the other political parties’ beliefs. He was named the first representative of the common man. He thought that excluding this people from the society was not the right way and damages the reputation of the country as “equal”. Although he thought that they were important, he acknowledge that these people without education were unfit and incapable of being the leaders of the young-free nation, and that is why during these times, unless they owned land, white men could not vote. Jackson took this belief a more radical way. Being denominated as the second

Open Document